The UK Babe Channels Forum

No offence but,why would anyone pay £20 or whatever it costs a month just to see pictures or videos of a girl with her hands over her boobs?.

(22-07-2009 18:53 )supergibbo Wrote: [ -> ]

(22-07-2009 18:05 )Shandy Wrote: [ -> ]so Gibbo joined and then cancelled after 24 hours after moaning about no new content, then some goes up? Lol. Irony!

hmmm great irony!!!! if u could be bothered to join site you would know that having joined for a month and cancel within 24 hours you still get access to site for the month u paid for,,,,,so i do get to see the new content for the next 4 weeks at least.....so yes i am gutted there is new content already.....NOT!!!!!! lol

you make an assumption there that i haven't joined. you don't know if i have or not. plus having been a member of camilla's & lori's as well, i never knew that. so really joining the site doesn't mean you automatically know that if you cancel within 24 hours you still get it for the next 4 weeks......

(22-07-2009 19:35 )xxxGeordie66xxx Wrote: [ -> ]No offence but,why would anyone pay £20 or whatever it costs a month just to see pictures or videos of a girl with her hands over her boobs?.

because they like the girl and wanna see these pics...........?? guess thats something to do with it........

the pics are great of paige just cuz she not topless doesnt mean the pics are bad

Thanks for the Pics DrGrumpyPants,much appreciated mate.
I would Just like to say the reason for the old pics is that the people making the site have been working on it for at least 8 months and if it took them that long to get this far I am sure they will be adding the new stuff as I type this.
As I recall the designer and webmaster who upload it all work in the U.S. and handle most of the girls sites.
So give them a chance to get things moving and I am sure all that Join will be happy.

(22-07-2009 21:14 )gersfan 321 Wrote: [ -> ]the pics are great of paige just cuz she not topless doesnt mean the pics are bad

nah there not bad but there not realy what you would expect from a babestation girl. yeah a party people girle, they aint explicite enought to warent the 20 quid a month unless your a diehard fan.
personaly i think paige isnt doing her self justice with her prudish attitudes far as getting nekid. yeah shes popular with a few guys here but how popular would she be if she steped up her game to say lynseys level. could you imaging if she steped up to anna's level on elite tv...

how much longer paige/her managment can get away with this kinda thing b4 the majority get bored is up for debate(its already happening judging by some of the replys here). me i sliding towards not much longer.
20 quid is 20 quid and at the end of the day if im gona spend it on 1 of these girls sites i think id expect a little more bang for my buck...

(23-07-2009 12:26 )Hexit Wrote: [ -> ]nah there not bad but there not realy what you would expect from a babestation girl. yeah a party people girle, they aint explicite enought to warent the 20 quid a month unless your a diehard fan.
personaly i think paige isnt doing her self justice with her prudish attitudes far as getting nekid. yeah shes popular with a few guys here but how popular would she be if she steped up her game to say lynseys level. could you imaging if she steped up to anna's level on elite tv...

how much longer paige/her managment can get away with this kinda thing b4 the majority get bored is up for debate(its already happening judging by some of the replys here). me i sliding towards not much longer.
20 quid is 20 quid and at the end of the day if im gona spend it on 1 of these girls sites i think id expect a little more bang for my buck...

Well lori's site has been up since January and is still going so it must be doing well enough, so don't see why it's any different to paige's one and Paige's site appears to have started off with some raunchier pic sets than loris. Or you chosing to ignore lori's site to suit your point?

didnt mention loris site as i havent botherd visiting it. so it wouldnt be prudent to say somthing on which i havent any knowlage....
so its pretty irrelivent. best you type her and the other girls site names in to alexa and see what her stats are for visits and signups they aint that great. but hey im just giving a point of view not so bored that i want to start bitching about it with you wee man... i got better things to do.

(23-07-2009 20:01 )Hexit Wrote: [ -> ]didnt mention loris site as i havent botherd visiting it. so it wouldnt be prudent to say somthing on which i havent any knowlage....
so its pretty irrelivent. best you type her and the other girls site names in to alexa and see what her stats are for visits and signups they aint that great. but hey im just giving a point of view not so bored that i want to start bitching about it with you wee man... i got better things to do.

well i think lori's site is a very relevant and important factor as it came before paige's and set the precedent and is still running 6 months later. what you did was like comparing a ford escort to a formula 1 car. all i wanted to point out was that it was a flawed point of view. sayng its not gonna last long is a bit uninformed, since its obviously gonna have at least 6 months if lori's site is anything to go by. thats all.

i think paige is mega hot but seriously, what has she got on. Its about as sexy as kerry katona- kev's hope she whips it off soon.