Now why on earth would I want to trawl through the forum to search for pictures of a girl I'm not really bothered about?
As I said I've just gone from the recent stuff on here.
I do find the whole will she/won't she, should she/shouldn't she stuff quite amusing though. And anybody who thinks people aren't going to keep talking about just about the only girl now on the nightshows who doesn't go fully topless are sort of missing the point I reckon.
As long as the current lack of nipples continues, Paige will continue to be near enough the biggest talking point across any of the channels by virtue of her exclusivity.
(26-08-2009 19:05 )MARCCE Wrote: [ -> ]As long as the current lack of nipples continues, Paige will continue to be near enough the biggest talking point across any of the channels by virtue of her exclusivity.
If only she wouldn't keep drawing attention to them by covering them up
Actually I couldn't care whether she shows them or not but the whole handbra thing just looks daft. It's like she's hanging onto them for fear they'll explode!
(26-08-2009 19:05 )MARCCE Wrote: [ -> ]Now why on earth would I want to trawl through the forum to search for pictures of a girl I'm not really bothered about?
I would have thought that any rational person would search the forum before posting on ANY subject, if only to avoid appearing foolish or ignorant.
If you're 'not bothered' about her, it seems odd that you bother to post about her.
(27-08-2009 06:18 )vila Wrote: [ -> ]I would have thought that any rational person would search the forum before posting on ANY subject, if only to avoid appearing foolish or ignorant.
If you're 'not bothered' about her, it seems odd that you bother to post about her.
I'm "bothered" by the polarised reactions that Paige gets from devotees and non devotees alike. That's what I find so interesting about it all. Plus of course the fact that she's on nightshows without going topless which is the biggest talking point people have about her to be fair.
And it's hardly "foolish" or "ignorant" as you put it. Some people seem to want to know every single detail about the girls they like right down to what they had for breakfast whilst others like myself just take a passing interest. I don't pretend to know about Paige's whole career, I don't particularly want to know about her whole career. I base my comments on what I've seen and that is just on Babestation.
Now given that the furthest I've seen Paige go on that channel is her holding her boobs in her hands, I'm hardly likely to trawl through the forum in eager search of pictures that going by that, are going to be exactly the same am I?
The fact that she has apparently done fully nude in the past just makes her non-topless stance even more strange I'd say.
Quote:The fact that she has apparently done fully nude in the past just makes her non-topless stance even more strange I'd say.
I'd say it clarifies the situation. It can mean only one thing - it's all just a marketing ploy.
yeh think that wraps this thread up its to get more cash
she is on party girls now and I dont care if she gets nips out or not she is hot sex
that is the best I have seen her in a long while.
I would rip those nipple covers off of her in my wildest fantasy.
(26-08-2009 01:16 )chumperchops Wrote: [ -> ]
Didn't realise she was south african till tonight.Do you think we will need a test to determine if she is a female????
The mother of Caster Semenya, the new 800m women's world champion, has expressed her disgust that her daughter has had to undergo a gender test.
She said in a statement, "For my lovely daughter, these allegations have been a real kick in the bollocks."
a good night from paige last night and like the outfit. probaly as far as shell go in terms of getting her boobs fully out