(23-08-2009 19:26 )SxciiSooky Wrote: [ -> ] (23-08-2009 19:13 )bytor Wrote: [ -> ].........
This is not a rant from me protecting Paige-Everyone is entitled to their own viewpoint but it does reinforce my view that some people hold a grudge against Paige for some strange reason. Lets have some consistency please
To be fair, part of the problem is with the way that certain members were over the top in their protection of Paige - that annoyed people, and in turn led people to be turned against Paige through association with their actions. She also hasn't helped matters herself with one or two of her posts on here having a pop at people
If she doesn't want to go topless, then fine - can't force her to. But both her and some of her fans* have to deal with the opposite viewpoint and learn to ignore it - and also learn that having an opposing viewpoint does not automatically mean they are attacking her or have anything against her. But she could also do without implying that she will at some point......
But perhaps it is time for this 'debate' to be laid to rest by both sides
*btw I am not saying you are part of this group, bytor - not for me to make judgements 
agree sooks it is time to put boobgate to bed now. its dragged on for far too long
(23-08-2009 20:30 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ] (23-08-2009 19:26 )SxciiSooky Wrote: [ -> ] (23-08-2009 19:13 )bytor Wrote: [ -> ].........
This is not a rant from me protecting Paige-Everyone is entitled to their own viewpoint but it does reinforce my view that some people hold a grudge against Paige for some strange reason. Lets have some consistency please
To be fair, part of the problem is with the way that certain members were over the top in their protection of Paige - that annoyed people, and in turn led people to be turned against Paige through association with their actions. She also hasn't helped matters herself with one or two of her posts on here having a pop at people
If she doesn't want to go topless, then fine - can't force her to. But both her and some of her fans* have to deal with the opposite viewpoint and learn to ignore it - and also learn that having an opposing viewpoint does not automatically mean they are attacking her or have anything against her. But she could also do without implying that she will at some point......
But perhaps it is time for this 'debate' to be laid to rest by both sides
*btw I am not saying you are part of this group, bytor - not for me to make judgements
agree sooks it is time to put boobgate to bed now. its dragged on for far too long
What they both said. This debate has more than run its course.
The End zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
And in the meantime the beautiful Paige a big hit on the Day Time Show still occupies a space on the Night Time Show that I'm sure a far more able and willing applicant from the Day Time Show could fill and save all this unpleasantness. Gillyboy2.
. The End.
Am thinking about buying her this
![[Image: the-hand-bra-31926-1235072203-21.jpg]](http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x66/PiR8_/the-hand-bra-31926-1235072203-21.jpg)
very good tsu. paige was good last night especially in the blue swimsuit
I personally think she has no nipples.
(26-08-2009 01:20 )Adampsquib Wrote: [ -> ]I personally think she has no nipples.
Hi there. She definitely has some; she did a very good shower scene on Babestation and had a nipple slip. Also there is a vid snatch on here somewhere when she was caught on camera TOPLESS between scenes. Her tits and nipples are lovely! She is very normal!
(24-08-2009 18:57 )MARCCE Wrote: [ -> ] (24-08-2009 11:27 )85stevewest Wrote: [ -> ]i dont really want to get politically involved in this,thought paige looked great again last night.
and sorry if anybodys already made this point cuz i havnt fully read the thread
i was wondering if the reason paige wont flash her tits is maybe it would lesson the sales on her personal photos which i assume are topless.at £3 a photo.{at least that what it use to cost me when i got charlene harts pics}she could lose a lot of sales if she flashed on tv.
Her photos aren't topless either are they?
From reading the other threads on this not even the pictures on her website are fully topless.
Either it's another Lucy Pinder style marketing ploy or Paige has decided to enter the world of glamour modelling whilst never wanting to show them.
(24-08-2009 20:05 )squizzell Wrote: [ -> ]Nail hit well and truly on the head, Marcce. 
Actually, nail well and truly missed by a country mile!
Anyone who's taken the trouble to search this forum will know that Paige has posed totally nude in the past.
Whatever decision Paige and/or Cellcast have decided now is what it is, take it or leave it, but ffs shut up about it. It's been done to death.
