(16-08-2009 14:41 )Freebird Wrote: [ -> ]actually that is a good point rick. if the producers said 'fine, no topless for you' then it's actually them that should answer to us, even more so for allowing lori to do exactly the same thing.
I'd also blame the producers for putting stuff in the text box suggesting that maybe tonight Paige might get them out when they know perfectly well she won't - it's this kind of tactic that's going to get people more annoyed.
If Paige ever does tell them it's going to happen I suspect we'll know as it'll get it's own theme music, a new set and a special premium £3 per minute rate.
(16-08-2009 14:45 )rickhardo Wrote: [ -> ]If Paige ever does tell them it's going to happen I suspect we'll know as it'll get it's own theme music, a new set and a special premium £3 per minute rate.
tut tut how cynical you are
indeed. thing is we almost seem surprised. this is cellcast after all. they promise the world but couldn't deliver a pint of milk.
(16-08-2009 14:45 )rickhardo Wrote: [ -> ]If Paige ever does tell them it's going to happen I suspect we'll know as it'll get it's own theme music, a new set and a special premium £3 per minute rate.
i think you've just given them there next big money making idea mate
(16-08-2009 14:37 )rickhardo Wrote: [ -> ]The argument of her knowing what was expected surely depends on the discussions she had with the producers. If she said she wasn't going to go topless and the bosses were happy with that then it's the producers that all complaints should be aimed at. Sadly, as far as I know, none of us was in that meeting.
Simply in terms of playing devils advocate - this would imply that she was part of the decision making process (
if this is what happened) and so is equally to blame. She only has to say she is not going to do it, end of discussion....it really is that simple, rather than tit for tat bullshit that she herself has also been guilty of in all honesty (not an attack but an observation)*
To imply that it is going to happen at some point means that there are no valid grounds to complain about those wishing for it to happen.
It's a topic that really doesn't merit this much vitriolic crap surrounding it - she's on nights, guys are gonna wanna see her tits (including those defending her, so it is hypocritical to attack those who admit they want to see them) and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that - it is an opinion, nothing more, nothing less. It's not gonna sway her decision at all, or anyones decision - but doesn't mean that they shouldn't be allowed to express it - what harm does it do? who gets hurt, really?
EDIT: Any post that does go too far (such as some of lee est's) then they get dealt with, so really....what is the issue?
*
says a lot about the nature of this 'discussion' when I have to put a disclaimer on points I make in order to not be subjected to the same 'abuse' I was subjected to by people deciding I was attacking her when I had never uttered a negative word against her (where were the shining knights then?)
Couldn't agree more about the amount of vitriol, Sooks. As the song says, "Why can't we be friends?"
Woo hoo! People are finally coming around to my way of thinking. In my opinion Cellcast/Babestation have a LOT to answer for. What pisses me off the most is the ambiguous approach they're taking on the whole subject; cryptic messages put up on the screen graphics, borderline false advertising and a general unwillingness to say anything definitive on the subject. The way they've let Paige take all the responsibility is shocking.
i think it rumble on untill she gets topless or says she not going to it
again its not a attack on pagie
I agree with Sooky, i'm quite new to all this so i'm not gonna trawl through this mammoth thread to read the to's and fro's of this argument, its pretty obvious what the jist is.
I suspect some of the members (i stress the word 'some')of this forum who "defend" Paige, (I add the inverted comma's as you may feel she has nothing to defend), are in some way trying to endear themselves to Paige herself, all the while denying themselves of their true opinions, which must be that you'd like to see her topless, i mean who wouldn't?!, She's a bombshell.
She's on a Televised sex-line that runs throughout the night, given the history of the show we can't be blamed for expecting it, it almost comes with the territory, more so, we are allowed the freedom of speech (even Lee Est, (although I fear having seen some of his posts that he's a law unto himself).*
Paige, please get your boobs out, not because you should, I just really want to see them 3/4 times a week, thanks.
Sooky, are those yours on your avatar, those are lovely!
* [ moderator edit - Former member lee est ]