The UK Babe Channels Forum

even if she did get her tits out she doesnt do it 4 me

(30-08-2009 22:48 )larrydavid Wrote: [ -> ]I can lip read and that's all I need.

A bit of nipple makes no odds. You can take the plastic 'babes' if that's what milks your cow.

Now the problem is - that's just the sort of comment about the other babes that if it was said about Paige in this thread would not be tolerated by her fans (not that exact quote but a similar type of post)

A bit of consistency and tolerance all round wouldn't go amiss

Seems all a big fuss over nothing.

(30-08-2009 15:56 )bytor Wrote: [ -> ]so you don't like Paige-why bother to write about her then-just find a girl you like and be happy. I don't like the Ferrari GP racing team but I don't waste my time trying to write on their forum so I can express my dislike.

Since you have brought up a Formula 1 analogy then I would ask you this:

If Ferrari were exempt from new rules governing tyres, aerodynamics and Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems and other teams were not exempt, would you then comment?

That is the situation with Paige, she is the exception to the rule with the night-shows. Unique rules apply to her and only her. Therefore it becomes topic of "debate" or it becomes a topic that people feel the need to comment on.

Quote:Also if you do not phone in the night shows how can you seriously complain about a girls performance when you cannot obviously hear her. These shows are there for people to ring and interact with pretty girls-not for people to simply watch-that is just a bonus for people.

Not according to Cellcast. Although all commercial television is funded by revenue that comes from advertising, or in the Babe Shows case PRS, The Participation Television Broadcasters Association are saying that the shows should not be classified purely as advertising for premium rate services as they do not exist only for this reason. They claim that the shows provide entertainment for over 250,000 viewers per night on Sky Digital and that only around 5% of those viewers phone or text the shows. (details here): http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/...tv_ass.pdf

Another analogy, like your F1/Ferrari one: Coronation Street only exists because of the promotional advertising that they have with Harveys the furniture store. Should fans of that show only be allowed to comment if they have a Harveys sofa?
"24" in the US only exists because of a promotional deal with Ford. Should fans of that show only be allowed to comment if they drive a Taurus?

If the viewers of Babestation wish to comment, then they should be allowed to until they feel the need to shut up.

(30-08-2009 22:48 )larrydavid Wrote: [ -> ]I can lip read and that's all I need.

A bit of nipple makes no odds. You can take the plastic 'babes' if that's what milks your cow.

Nipples are made from plastic? I think you need a lesson on female anatomy, or perhaps take a break from watching Paige.

Well I think Paige has many people wrapped around her little finger. How many ring her just to see if they can get a peek? It's an amazing strategy for bringing in the bucks - while it lasts.

Anyone here heard of Kari Sweets? "The 'nets sexiest non-nude model" (or some such twaddle) She's a real PT and no doubt Paige's role model.

Paige is lovely, she's a dead ringer for one of my exes but, she drives me nuts with all the teasing and covering up. I suppose that's part of her appeal but also the greatest turn-off (for me at least). I'm a patient bloke usually but when that turns to frustration its not pleasant at all, just annoying.

Bottom line is I can't watch her and I won't call her - seeing her once was quite enough for me (and the same goes for Ms Sweets too).

(31-08-2009 15:32 )IanG Wrote: [ -> ]Well I think Paige has many people wrapped around her little finger. How many ring her just to see if they can get a peek? It's an amazing strategy for bringing in the bucks - while it lasts.

Anyone here heard of Kari Sweets? "The 'nets sexiest non-nude model" (or some such twaddle) She's a real PT and no doubt Paige's role model.

Paige is lovely, she's a dead ringer for one of my exes but, she drives me nuts with all the teasing and covering up. I suppose that's part of her appeal but also the greatest turn-off (for me at least). I'm a patient bloke usually but when that turns to frustration its not pleasant at all, just annoying.

Bottom line is I can't watch her and I won't call her - seeing her once was quite enough for me (and the same goes for Ms Sweets too).

You can't watch her, you won't call her & seeing her once was enough for you then why are you in her thread ? Surely it must be painful for you to even be in her thread.
What is it with the paige haters? She is one girl on screen for 30 minutes at a time-loads of other channels to choose from with loads of topless girls on as much as you can wish for. I can think of several of the girls who I am not keen on but I do not feel the need to continuously write cruel and nasty comments on their threads.
Paige's job like any of the girls is to take calls and be part of a fantasy for the length of a call-she does that exceedingly well.

(31-08-2009 18:44 )bytor Wrote: [ -> ]You can't watch her, you won't call her & seeing her once was enough for you then why are you in her thread ? Surely it must be painful for you to even be in her thread.

Psssst.. it's not her thread.

It's a thread about her and her performances, for forum members to discuss her and her performances. See the distinction? It's an important one.

(31-08-2009 18:44 )bytor Wrote: [ -> ]What is it with the paige haters? She is one girl on screen for 30 minutes at a time-loads of other channels to choose from with loads of topless girls on as much as you can wish for. I can think of several of the girls who I am not keen on but I do not feel the need to continuously write cruel and nasty comments on their threads.
Paige's job like any of the girls is to take calls and be part of a fantasy for the length of a call-she does that exceedingly well.

Hate is a strong word. Nobody hates her, some are just irritated because she won't show her tits. And I don't think anybody's posted cruel remarks about her.

I'm not fussed if she ever shows her tits, I still think she looks great and does a fine job, but people are entitled to their opinion even if I think it's a massive overreaction.

Thing is its obv only she who doesnt want us to see her tits. The fact is, she doesnt understand it makes more of a diference that she doesnt show them ,making her look a fool. We dont really care, as ,just how special can they be? Are they diferent colours? Its a nonsence, and even if she is a great performer,or good on the phones, i am DONE with the split-morality of girls on these shows!!