(16-08-2009 15:30 )SxciiSooky Wrote: [ -> ] (16-08-2009 15:28 )dannyboy744 Wrote: [ -> ]Sooky, are those yours on your avatar, those are lovely!
OFF TOPIC DISCLAIMER 
But yes, they are mine
Somebody somewhere is very very lucky indeed that you are so definitely blessed.
Speaking for myself I can honestly say that my motivation for defending Paige has never been to endear myself to her. Some of the arguements used to defend her in the past have been very weak indeed. My arguement is simple: there is a much bigger picture that some people are missing. Also i've never been against free speach and I'm actually glad that this is no longer a taboo subject like it was about a month ago. Discussion is healthy and free speach is glorious, and that's why i'll continue to defend Paige.
(16-08-2009 15:49 )dannyboy744 Wrote: [ -> ]Somebody somewhere is very very lucky indeed that you are so definitely blessed.
i am that somebody somewhere and i am indeed
(16-08-2009 15:50 )samcooke Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking for myself I can honestly say that my motivation for defending Paige has never been to endear myself to her. Some of the arguements used to defend her in the past have been very weak indeed. My arguement is simple: there is a much bigger picture that some people are missing. Also i've never been against free speach and I'm actually glad that this is no longer a taboo subject like it was about a month ago. Discussion is healthy and free speach is glorious, and that's why i'll continue to defend Paige.
No arguments with that, well said.
(16-08-2009 15:50 )samcooke Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking for myself I can honestly say that my motivation for defending Paige has never been to endear myself to her. Some of the arguements used to defend her in the past have been very weak indeed. My arguement is simple: there is a much bigger picture that some people are missing. Also i've never been against free speach and I'm actually glad that this is no longer a taboo subject like it was about a month ago. Discussion is healthy and free speach is glorious, and that's why i'll continue to defend Paige.
Couldn't agree more. I actually stopped reading this thread a few weeks back due to the amount of spite on it - it's good to see we are having a "discussion" again rather than an argument.
i recently saw the paige vid the other day wen she had her boobs out during the changeover and it pissed me off a bit cuz i got the impression that its not paige that dont want to get them out and why wouldnt she they are beautiful it felt like it is the greedy fucking bosses that are enjoyin the extra money coming from the ever so heard question WILL SHE WONT SHE. as soon as they thought the cameras werent rollin she got em straight out and she looked like she was lovin it!
yh i think its the bosses enjoy getting the extra cash i think its them telling pagie and lori to keep there bra's on so they can rack in the cash mabye am wrong
(16-08-2009 16:14 )The Pork Sword Wrote: [ -> ]i recently saw the paige vid the other day wen she had her boobs out during the changeover and it pissed me off a bit cuz i got the impression that its not paige that dont want to get them out and why wouldnt she they are beautiful it felt like it is the greedy fucking bosses that are enjoyin the extra money coming from the ever so heard question WILL SHE WONT SHE. as soon as they thought the cameras werent rollin she got em straight out and she looked like she was lovin it!
I tend to agree with what Pork Sword is saying as you will notice the cameras avoiding a direct view when she is topless even when the full-on topless shot is available. So the camera operators have been instructed not to shoot Paige's uncovered boobs. That said, I also think that Paige is playing along with it too. I think the only time this will become an issue is if/when Paige's call rate has dropped. It is then the producers & Paige/Lori will have a decision to make.
So tell me do any of you boo at football when your team does not perform to an acceptable standard give the league they are in?
Would you complain if your favourite supermarket only stocked products that were 5 months out of date?
Would you continue to watch you favourite programs if the actors just sat about doing nothing?
Or maybe you'd be quite happy to sit in the cinema and watch half a movie and then be asked to leave!
There are far too many people wearing rose tinted spectacles,if you are not prepared to do a job properly then don't do the job, daytime performances have no place in night show it undermines the already weakened structure the self acclaimed governing body (you know who I mean) are dictating as to what we can and can't see after the 9pm watershed, as a grown adult I have expectations of what I should be able to see whilst viewing an adult orientated channel, after 9pm is considered to be adult TV time and therefore should have a standard met, to expect to see at least a pair of boobs is not beyond a reasonable expectation and I for one feel very aggrieved if this expectation is not met its defrauding us of our rights to see an adult performer performing and if anyone does not class themselves as an adult performer then don't work between the hours of 9pm - 05:30am!
I have not got my tongue up anyone's arse believing they can do no wrong in the hope they might thank me for a comment of devotion, nor am I slating any individual this is just my opinion!
This thread just like daytime girls doing night shows has been going on too long and maybe an end should be brought to both!