(22-08-2014 23:13 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ] (22-08-2014 23:07 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]not at all...
I wish I had your optimism. How long has it been now since we had a USA show? Over a week?
When you consider the list of girls they have to call on, that seems a long time to go without a show.
I think the reason for it is that with the exception of Tori Black, most of these US girls are simply not prepared to pander to our ridiculous censorship laws... and good on them.
actually it is less than a week juankerr. the last s66usa show was Lexi Belle on the 18th august so 4 nights ago. as for why there hasn't been a show since then who knows other than last night when lexi belle had to cancel because she wasn't well with apparent food poisoning. don't think it is anything to do with the Ofcom rules though as youre saying though
whangie knew you'd come in here and have a pop at studio 66 and me
in addition to your constant pop at me in your signature which is completely out of order. the forum is about debate and expressing opinions and not about attacking other forum members
(22-08-2014 23:13 )whangie Wrote: [ -> ]Judging by the sparse posts on this thread
You may have used the word sparse without understanding it's meaning.
Let's make a comparison to illustrate the point.
ChatGirl TVX - hardcore webshow recently closed
Main discussion thread started 10 months ago
179 posts
35,000 views
Studio 66 USA - Ofcom regulated TV broadcast
Main discussion thread started 2 and a half months ago
671 posts
103,000 views
(23-08-2014 00:16 )Count Spankula Wrote: [ -> ]You may have used the word sparse without understanding it's meaning.
Let's make a comparison to illustrate the point.
ChatGirl TVX - hardcore webshow recently closed
Main discussion thread started 10 months ago
179 posts
35,000 views
Studio 66 USA - Ofcom regulated TV broadcast
Main discussion thread started 2 and a half months ago
671 posts
103,000 views
Your point is
(apart from failing dismally to make as patronising a post as possible)
I'll stick to reckoning posts are "sparse" on this thread, especially in the past month.
Then it makes sense to point out they were "very sparse" on the other thread you've quoted.
Judging by the recent collapse of ChatGirl TVX, the calls to that webshow were "terminally sparse".
Is that enough for my GCSE in the meaning and use of the word "sparse" ?
Given current education standards, I've probably covered half its A-Level syllabus as well.
(23-08-2014 00:16 )Count Spankula Wrote: [ -> ]Studio 66 USA - Ofcom regulated TV broadcast
Main discussion thread started 2 and a half months ago
671 posts
103,000 views
Another comparison you could make is with the main Studio 66 discussion thread. Admittedly that has been going for over 5 years, making it difficult to make a fair comparison because of such different timescales, but just for a bit of fun anyway the Studio66 USA discussion thread gets about 50% more posts and about 50% more views than the main Studio 66 discussion thread.
It's been mildly amusing seeing how this argument about sparsity has added another page to the thread.
(23-08-2014 01:18 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ] It's been mildly amusing seeing how this argument about sparsity has added another page to the thread.
I believe it's an excellent example of irony.
the only girl that has put on a show worth watching (in my opinion) is tory lane. but because she pushed the boundaries, elite 66 decided not to have her back.
But lots of girls have only been on once or twice, not just Tory Lane. There are loads who haven't been back.
so are we swaying, that all of a sudden St66USA is in crisis?
