(15-06-2014 02:39 )anchorman Wrote: [ -> ]Is there a time difference?
Have i been watching a dayshow? 
It's woeful, isn't it?
I must confess I was rather excited by the prospect of this show, as I was basing it on the performances of the American porn guests S66 have had on in the past. Why were the producers so relaxed when they had them over here in the UK studios, only to then put out tame (even by today's standards) shows like this when they've been given their own channel?
(15-06-2014 02:39 )anchorman Wrote: [ -> ]Is there a time difference?
Have i been watching a dayshow?
well it is still daytime on the west coast of america i suppose
(14-06-2014 23:11 )J T Wrote: [ -> ]I haven't even bothered to look in tonight. What does that tell you?
I ddin're even bother was watching England instead. By the way JT why isn't Fern on your list of Day time babes?
Well, I liked her better back in the day TBH. Whenever I try to watch her I turn against it, I don't know why. I guess she's sort of lost appeal for me.
(15-06-2014 02:51 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Rammy I do hope you rung Maddy up and gave her your heartfelt assurances 
I'm still waiting for you to publish those vital call statistics 
and im still waiting for you to be positive about s66 which wont be till hell freezes over or I win the lottery either of which isn't going to happen
can't see how last night was a dayshow given maddy went fully topless and you cant go topless on a dayshow!!!!!!!!
after 2 nights think s66usa is doing well and will only get better in time
(15-06-2014 11:24 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]can't see how last night was a dayshow given maddy went fully topless and you cant go topless on a dayshow!!!!!!!!
It's what's known as 'sarcasm', Rammy.
Sarcasm
ˈsɑːkaz(ə)m/
noun
the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
Studio 66 USA can only get worse over time. Last night she went topless. Tonight, she might just wear a bra all night! They might aswell stick to days as they're acting as if it is. Why should Scottishbloke have to positive about Studio 66? People are entitled to their own opinions so why, Rammy, does that give you the right to criticise him?
I'm sure that some effort was put into making sure that the opening week's schedule was made up of girls that most people would have heard of, to make it seem impressive. Sara Jay seems quite a coup for example.
I wonder though, after a few weeks, will they need to bring in "promising up and coming new starlet" so-and-so in order to fill in the gaps when the big names have more important engagements to attend.
There is a chance these stars do not truly think they've made it until they hit the big time of UK babe channels. But there is also a chance that they just happened to find one free night in their diary to have a go at something different.
(15-06-2014 12:49 )J T Wrote: [ -> ]Studio 66 USA can only get worse over time. Last night she went topless. Tonight, she might just wear a bra all night! They might aswell stick to days as they're acting as if it is. Why should Scottishbloke have to positive about Studio 66? People are entitled to their own opinions so why, Rammy, does that give you the right to criticise him?
I never said Scottishbloke has to be positive about s66, just would be nice for him to say something positive rather than what he pretty much always does in the s66 section which is to constantly attack it and any forum member who says anything positive about s66. I have the right to criticise him because we are on a forum where forum members post comments to which other people post either agreeing or disagreeing. so therefore scottishbloke is entitled to his own opinion but people are also entitled on the forum to criticise what he is saying.
I think s66 will get better over time after the good start it has had so far