thanks bandwagon, for once I agree with you. why does it matter whether or not a forum member has called the shows or not. everyone as you say is entitled to their opinion and they are all valid regardless of whether or not they have called the shows.
hopefully the pic skipping will stop soon, but it's a lot better than it was when s66usa started
I think i have figured out the reason why the channels picture quality is all pixillated.
It's all part of S66's masterplan. If by any fuckin' remote chance one of the babes does something that offcom don't approve of. Well S66 can reply to them. "Sorry, yeah we realised that that is why we pixillated it out.
(24-06-2014 00:31 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]to you and whangie, I will keep on being how I am on the forum, posting what I want unless the mods say otherwise, not because you two don't like what I say and do
So that's a deafening lack of effort from you to discuss or amend your total hypocrisy of lecturing myself and other forum-members on how they should behave on this forum despite you not being a moderator, yet only being willing to be told by moderators how you should behave on this forum.
I'll willingly agree to disagree with you on all sorts of topics on this forum (not just within this S66USA thread) and, equally willingly, agree with you from time to time as well although it's obvious our tastes don't coincide very often.
But I'll relentlessly attack any of your posts that showcase your disgusting hypocrisy that I've just identified.
How can anyone be ganging up on you ? - it's actually your own deeply hypocritical posts which are inviting such fully justified and widespread criticism ?
The picture is much improved but the hop, skip and a jump is making it hard to watch. Surely someone back at HQ in the UK most be telling them to sort the stream out. If passing custom is thinking that it's unwatchable with the stuttering feed how much trade will be going else where.
And with reply to Rammy, I'll have my hat baked, and no I won't watch Sara Jay in a scene to see if she's a porn star, I'll take your word for it, personally I'd rather watch paint dry, she is not my cup of tea at all. Also, further to Scottishblokes comment regarding your personal circumstance with your outlook on life, there are people in the world with worse backgrounds and worse situations but they don't air them on forums feeling sorry for themselves, it's life get on with it.
(23-06-2014 22:21 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder if the staffing problems are due to the time difference? The shift in LA would be from 1pm to 7pm, or thereabouts. It clashes totally with the working day when they could be earning big bucks doing their actual porn job, rather than talking to a few limeys for peanuts.
The top porn stars in LA would probably be shooting porn 50-60 days a year. They have plenty of time to do other stuff, webcam work, appearing as feature dancers, escorting, or whatever way they want to supplement their income, including working for Studio 66 USA. Look at porn stars who are exclusive to a particular studio - it can take a year or two before they have 50 scenes to their name, so they must have plenty of time available to do other work.
(24-06-2014 01:10 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]why does it matter whether or not a forum member has called the shows or not. everyone as you say is entitled to their opinion and they are all valid regardless of whether or not they have called the shows.
On this specific point I am actually in agreement with you Rammy which is why I created the 'Non callers entitled to criticize' thread in the UK Babe Channels section of this forum
.
Constructive praise and constructive criticism are healthy.
My general view is that overly personal remarks are not healthy and nor is trolling.
As long as everything is kept in perspective its fine
.
And before anyone gets ratty I am not having a pop at any individual forum members.
My point is merely a general one
.
S66 USA has just not worked for me because the picture quality and juddering is poor, the sets are rather uninspiring and if I want to watch porn stars my general preference is to watch them in porn action rather than the watered down stuff on S66 USA.
is it safe to post in this thread again?
Last night Missy seemed like she'd be fun, but unfortunately the broadcast was not smooth, not even close. It's a shame because Missy probably deserved more calls, but I don't see why anyone would risk calling knowing that any second the live images will freeze or cut off completely. I don't know if it got better later on for her, did anyone stick with it?
This is an honest review, and one that probably stings more than saying it was just terrible. I felt sorry for those involved, it can't have been fun just praying for the stream to go smoothly
have to say im looking forward to seeing Adriana Chechnik tonight as she is us adult star I haven't heard of. seen the pic of her on the s66 website and she looks a really stunning natural babe
(24-06-2014 01:10 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]... why does it matter whether or not a forum member has called the shows or not.
It doesn't, Rammy, but those who do call the shows seem to think you're not entitled to an opinion unless you do.
These shitehawks (and I refer to all the channels here) will never get a penny off me, but I will continue to criticise them as much as I like.
If people want to throw their money at these con merchants, that's their look-out, but I'll never listen to anyone who tells me I'm not entitled to an opinion because I prefer to keep my money in the bank.
(24-06-2014 15:44 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]have to say im looking forward to seeing Adriana Chechnik tonight as she is us adult star I haven't heard of. seen the pic of her on the s66 website and she looks a really stunning natural babe
Adriana is a proper down and dirty filth bag; cute looking and a natural body. In an upcoming move Gangbang Me she does triple anal!!! Triple anal - how is that even possible??? Have to say she is the first girl I've been tempted to call on Studio66.
If the feed is good, this may be a good show