(06-07-2014 17:53 )Craig_123 Wrote: [ -> ]If anything it should have been web only that way it wouldn't take time off the UK girls...
(07-07-2014 15:31 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ]What do you mean by this?
didn't you agree with him like 20 mins ago?
(07-07-2014 15:06 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ] (06-07-2014 17:53 )Craig_123 Wrote: [ -> ]If anything it should have been web only that way it wouldn't take time off the UK girls...
I agree. I feel the same about Asian Connections. It's not right, is it?
(06-07-2014 17:53 )Craig_123 Wrote: [ -> ]If anything it should have been web only that way it wouldn't take time off the UK girls and could be unrestricted?, interesting idea for many just not being run correctly.
(07-07-2014 15:31 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ] (06-07-2014 17:53 )Craig_123 Wrote: [ -> ]If anything it should have been web only that way it wouldn't take time off the UK girls...
What do you mean by this?
You have not quoted what Craig_123 said in full, you have missed off the bit where he said it could be unrestricted on the web .
A explanation of what he means has been given here
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1494381
Starting to wonder if JuanKerr is some sort of forum troll...
It could be possible that he's trying to understand our posts via a online translator, which is doing a piss poor job of making what we are posting to a sentence that makes sense.
Seems to ask for clarification on posts a lot.
Then when someone explains what the post, he replies and tries to bring some asian forum discussion to the S66 USA thread.
I'm confused as to why he keeps bringing that thing up here as it is completely irrelevant.
I would explain, but my posts, including those quoted by terence, keep getting deleted.
Very clever of terence - a moderator, I see - to quote my deleted posts in at attempt to make me look contradictory.
What he and the other mods have seemingly failed to realise, though, is that by quoting my posts they are allowed to remain, which defeats the whole process of deleting them in the first place. Genius!
Can I ask that you do your job properly in future, then, and notify me of the move? I'm not a mind-reader.
(07-07-2014 17:47 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ]Can I ask that you do your job properly in future, then, and notify me of the move? I'm not a mind-reader.
.... They are doing their job's properly. The non-S66 USA discussion that you brought up got moved to a more related section of the forum.
It even got quoted and linked by Mr Mystery just a couple of posts above.
(07-07-2014 15:54 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]You have not quoted what Craig_123 said in full, you have missed off the bit where he said it could be unrestricted on the web .
A explanation of what he means has been given here http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1494381
Insulting the mods and not bothering to read previous posts is not helping your cause.
I saw this channel for the first time last night and liked the girl I saw a lot, Rachelle. I gather it was her first appearance, in which case I hope she did well enough to be booked some more.
(07-07-2014 15:54 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]You have not quoted what Craig_123 said in full, you have missed off the bit where he said it could be unrestricted on the web .
No, you're right, I didn't quote the full post. I quoted the only part that was relevant. What does the fact that it could be unrestricted on the web have to do with the point I was making?
(07-07-2014 20:52 )southlondonphil Wrote: [ -> ]I saw this channel for the first time last night and liked the girl I saw a lot, Rachelle.
Only one L in Rachele! I can imagine that this channel could create interest in these girls' porn work, as those seeing girls like Rachele for the first time, knowing she's a porn star, may well be prompted to seek out what porn work she's done. Is this part of the thinking behind the channel, bearing in mind it's apparently a partnership between Studio 66 and a US porn studio?