The UK Babe Channels Forum

I'd love to see Diana Doll on the show.

Firstly I'd just like to clarify something here, if Studio66 USA was just simply another channel number acquired on the SKY EPG I pretty much doubt that it would get half the criticism that its been met with.

My main issue with it and always has been is that it's at the detriment of the UK based ones. When RLC had that Rio Channel it effectively had nothing to lose, they kept all of their existing ones, none of the UK based channels were culled and neither were any of the babes.

Studio66 USA has been an entirely different story. Since the start of 2014 Studio66 has gone from 4 channels to 2. They are losing talent and are promoting 0 fresh faces.

Babestation on the other hand couldn't be more contrasting, they have a very successful webshow in the name of Unleashed and are discovering new talent all the time. Studio66 is the exact opposite. Studio66 USA has everything going against it, its been a disaster since night 1 and the politics behind this all hasn't gone unnoticed.

(27-06-2014 11:25 )HannahsPet Wrote: [ -> ]think thats more to do with the sets and the lighting its deffo better than the 3 BS channels and maybe on par with the RLC ones and only slightly worse than 912 and 942

I agree it's better than the BS channels, but to me it doesn't look close to the picture I get on Sky 912.

(27-06-2014 19:06 )TickleTheOrc Wrote: [ -> ]Though I wouldn't have used the term you used of ""silicone barbie dolls from the UK". " as it is pretty derogatory and politically charged words. Hence why I flipped out at you initially after breezing through the thread.

Ah, I see. It was your phrase, "... when you've got a hard on against enhanced girls." that confused me.

I thought you were suggesting I was being hypocritical because I'm aroused by the silicone enhanced girls.

(27-06-2014 22:25 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Studio66 USA has been an entirely different story. Since the start of 2014 Studio66 has gone from 4 channels to 2. They are losing talent and are promoting 0 fresh faces.

Well the girls they've had on S66USA so far are fresh to me.

I don't buy into all this crap about promoting 'our homegrown talent'. More foreign channels and girls (preferably from Europe) is exactly what the babe channels need as far as I'm concerned.

(27-06-2014 23:30 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ]I don't buy into all this crap about promoting 'our homegrown talent'. More foreign channels and girls (preferably from Europe) is exactly what the babe channels need as far as I'm concerned.

Well, I don't mind S66 USA as long as the performances don't put me to sleep. Tonight's performer: Tori Black knows how to use her body. The starting line up for S66 USA was really shakey for the most part.

Though tonight, I'm finding it hard not to call Lucy Summers. Nakie girls that know how to move are hard to resist.

Showmanship and personality that shines through a television screen is what going to bring calls in. Regardless of enhanced boobies or natural boobies.

(27-06-2014 23:36 )TickleTheOrc Wrote: [ -> ]Showmanship and personality that shines through a television screen is what going to bring calls in. Regardless of enhanced boobies or natural boobies.

No doubt. I was merely stating my preference and that I prefer the (mainly) natural girls of S66USA than the enhanced UK ones.

(27-06-2014 23:45 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ]No doubt. I was merely stating my preference and that I prefer the (mainly) natural girls of S66USA than the enhanced UK ones.

Well, your preferences are pretty clear. It was just the initially charged wording that had me seeing red.

"silicone barbie dolls" just has so much negative connotation's with the phrasing. Given that I'd say 75% of the girls are enhanced, that is a lot of the line up that doesn't mesh with you.

enhanced is generally a much more neutral wording and probably more politically correct.

Saying silicone barbie dolls for girls that have had plastic surgery is like calling people of a homosexual orientation HIV fags or rape victims Sluts. You just don't say those things unless you trying to stir up a storm.

Though on a side note, the S66 scheduler usually does take your preference for natural breasts into consideration most of the time. In just about any night show on S66, there is usually one "natural" breasted girl. If that natural girl is one you like, is still up in the air though.

I've just been through all the adult channels on Sky and I couldn't find a single channel which I thought had a better picture than Studio 66 USA. Even with Sky 912 which I've always thought was the best I couldn't honestly say it was better than channel 941.

(27-06-2014 23:30 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ]

(27-06-2014 22:25 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Studio66 USA has been an entirely different story. Since the start of 2014 Studio66 has gone from 4 channels to 2. They are losing talent and are promoting 0 fresh faces.

Well the girls they've had on S66USA so far are fresh to me.

I don't buy into all this crap about promoting 'our homegrown talent'. More foreign channels and girls (preferably from Europe) is exactly what the babe channels need as far as I'm concerned.

I also don't buy this either. yes homegrown talent (uk babes) is important but not at the expense of non homegrown (non uk) babes and for me should be a nice mix of uk (homegrown) and non uk babes (not homegrown) on the babeshows. lots of people out there like foreign babes like the s66 usa adult stars and not the homegrown s66 babes so s66 needs to cater for all tastes