(24-06-2014 15:44 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]have to say im looking forward to seeing Adriana Chechnik tonight as she is us adult star I haven't heard of. seen the pic of her on the s66 website and she looks a really stunning natural babe
Heads up Rammy, you might want to spell her name correctly when you start the thread later "Adriana
Chechik"
Not looking good so far tonight as image is still woefull,Adriana may be a good performer but as was the case last night we are gonna struggle to see her,let alone call her,sadly all this venture has done is expose the ineptitude of S66 to provide a watchable show and if they cant find a long term solution they might just as well shelve the idea and have a clothed nightshow channel instead,especially with the overstaffed day rosta they currently have.
it's a real pity
Blame the tools, I guess.
(24-06-2014 21:51 )Sm© Wrote: [ -> ] (24-06-2014 15:44 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]have to say im looking forward to seeing Adriana Chechnik tonight as she is us adult star I haven't heard of. seen the pic of her on the s66 website and she looks a really stunning natural babe
Heads up Rammy, you might want to spell her name correctly when you start the thread later "Adriana Chechik"
yep seen that now ive spelt Adriana's surname wrong earlier and will spell it correctly in her thread.
wouldn't say the image/picture quality is woeful tonight, especially when you compare it to the image/pic quality that s66usa had when it first started. yes it is still juddering, but not juddering as bad as before and overall a vast improvement
hasn't affected Adriana so far interms of callers it looks like, seems to have been busy on the phones pretty much since she started and hairbald your right she is a proper down and dirty filthbag. have seen some of here scenes today and in one of them she did double vaginal
and in another she did double anal !!!!!
(24-06-2014 23:09 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]wouldn't say the image/picture quality is woeful tonight, especially when you compare it to the image/pic quality that s66usa had when it first started. yes it is still juddering, but not juddering as bad as before and overall a vast improvement
As you correctly says, the picture's "still juddering" even if not quite as much as before (although it's still a long way from any sort of professionally acceptable standard),
And if you check your calendar you'll see we're nearly halfway through 2014.
Whether you like it or not, that does indeed amount to an absolutely woeful situation when even a channel's most ardent supporter admits that channel's picture is "still juddering" in 2014 given all the readily available and relatively inexpesnive broadcasting and webcam technology.
Tonight, Playboy/RLC are running 4 channels, Babestation 3 channels, the rest of S66 or Golden Girls 3 channels between them, Xpanded 3 channels and Storm 1 channel, making 14 in total.
There's more juddering on S66USA (despite some improvement compared to last week) than on all those other 14 put together.
If that's not a genuinely woeful situation, even if your ridiculously fluffy world, please tell me what is ?
I'm not sticking up for the image quality onS66 because it is dire.
However the webstream quality is similar to BS webstream.
On the Telly though it is way behind.
The regular S66 webstream is good, why can't they get the USA channel up to the same quality. I'm guessing they are working on it. Well at least i'm hoping so!
(25-06-2014 03:43 )Block Wrote: [ -> ]I'm guessing they are working on it. Well at least i'm hoping so!
One would think they'd have these issues worked out before they turned the channel on.
It could all be down just to the location of where the channel is located. If ever you see news reports on TV the picture quality is always less if the reporter is situated anywhere in the USA as opposed to someone who is doing a report from say Westminster in London
These picture quality problems that everyone is complaining about may never go away, and may simply be there for the duration. I personally have no interest in Studio66 USA whatsoever so doesnt bother me
Gorgeous looking girl but I gave up, in this day and age the feed is shocking, very unprofessional, it needs fecking sorting out, how many others that don't visit this forum will be watching for a minute or so and thinking the same. It will certainly have an impact on calls to because the hour I watched she answered the phone 3 times and each call must have lasted 2 minutes tops.
If anyone has premature ejaculation problems then this is the channel to watch, start, stop, start, stop, start, stop, come on Studio 66 you can't put two strokes together watching this
Just out of interest, what was the picture like before the USA broadcasts started? Because I haven't been able to get Sky channel 941 for a long time.