The UK Babe Channels Forum

^^ Pretty much confirms what I was told

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1643824

There's no Sky listing for channel 913 on the 31st March

(24-03-2015 19:53 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]^
Yes Delia has a few nice things to say about Phil Barry and Playboy TV chat https://twitter.com/deliarosee1/status/5...7799746562

Kind of miss his 'professionalism' to us on this thread. Maybe that's why he's doing it to the babes

used to be a top channel

(18-03-2015 18:02 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Once they reintroduce the oil shows, the hot 2 for 1's aswell as the water based sets then I might have something more positive to say on this once great channel. Sorry to piss on the parade here folks but a reality check is needed I suspect.

That's hardly likely to happen is it, especially when they've got OFCOM constantly watching them.

Both RLC & ST66 would be better if they weren't restricted, but unfortunately they are which means they are stuck. Just a pity they couldn't both apply for a foreign license, like BS & SinTV have got.

As for having less channels, what a good idea... NOT!!! Less channels means less TV space, and that in turn would mean less babes on TV. That is unless someone intends to nick the conveyor belt from the "Generation Game" of course

And as someone has predicted that PlayboyTV/RLC will not be here is 12 months, I will quite happily predict the opposite, until proven otherwise.

If you don't like a channel then the simple answer is don't watch it. After all there are people who do like watching RLC, and even when Charlie Green is on

(24-03-2015 14:23 )Lotuseater Wrote: [ -> ]The ads obviously bring in direct revenue

I really wouldn't mind ads if they kept the channels going, but the ads haven't stopped Red Light from losing a channel.

rlc own schedule is blank from tomorrow (26th) for 913 except for 1 casting girl for a few hours on Friday.

(25-03-2015 23:10 )FanofCamilla Wrote: [ -> ]rlc own schedule is blank from tomorrow (26th) for 913 except for 1 casting girl for a few hours on Friday.

I will post up the correct schedule later for the rest of week and next week

(25-03-2015 22:04 )Roger Patterson Wrote: [ -> ]

(24-03-2015 14:23 )Lotuseater Wrote: [ -> ]The ads obviously bring in direct revenue

I really wouldn't mind ads if they kept the channels going, but the ads haven't stopped Red Light from losing a channel.

You would mind if you were on the phone to one of the babes when the annoying adverts kept interrupting your fun. Hence the loss of caller revenue where the channels make their money

(26-03-2015 00:15 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote: [ -> ]You would mind if you were on the phone to one of the babes when the annoying adverts kept interrupting your fun.

No, as I said, if it was the difference between the channel surviving and it non surviving, I would be prepared to tolerate the ads.