The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602
how here are some puppies i would like to see on a night show Candy & TeeJay

[Image: rlc_439.jpg]
Too right winsaw Wink.
(19-10-2013 05:43 )eyres42 Wrote: [ -> ]They should rename the channel Red Hot Dinosaurs given the average age of the 'babes' these days.

I think you'll find that many of the more 'experienced' babes give a high level of satisfaction to the callers.
(21-10-2013 22:39 )elgar1uk Wrote: [ -> ]
(19-10-2013 05:43 )eyres42 Wrote: [ -> ]They should rename the channel Red Hot Dinosaurs given the average age of the 'babes' these days.

What is the average age of the babes then?

52?
(21-10-2013 21:25 )dogman Wrote: [ -> ]
(20-10-2013 19:14 )Voiceofreason Wrote: [ -> ]
(19-10-2013 05:43 )eyres42 Wrote: [ -> ]They should rename the channel Red Hot Dinosaurs given the average age of the 'babes' these days.

I praise RLC for its diversity they offer something for everyone, it's brave, it's forward thinking & it's clever.
Calling mature performers dinosaurs is insulting quite frankly, open your mind & realise their is more than just you in the universe, then engage brain before typing!!
That may be so,but being a DINOSAURS my self,I only have interest in Beautiful non OAP,SO LACKING HERE.ON NIGHTS.

A thing to consider is these days quite a few night-time Playboy/RLC girls don't really fit the criteria of girls associated with the Playboy image, winsaw mentioned a while ago that the main Playboy company only wanted girls that have looks associated with Playboy to appear on Ch 902, so with RLC now seemingly starting to employ more girls not really associated with the glamorous Playboy look they could struggle some nights to find girls that fit the criteria set by Playboy of girls allowed to be broadcast along side the Playboy banner, it could be a brave thing to do to employ so many mature and non Playboy types, but in doing so it restricts the amount of girls they have available for them to use on Sky 902, unless of cause Playboy have relaxed the rules for girls they now allow on 902 ? they may not be to keen of the look of some of some of the girls RLC may have to use on Ch 902 .
Kiesha Kane for example is down on the Playboy TV Chat website schedule to be on 902 Sunday and Monday night, no disrespect meant to Kiesha but she's not what i associate with the Playboy image, some may not agree .

For a company allowed to broadcast a show using the Playboy name they probably employ the least amount of girls associated with the Playboy image these days of all the channels imo, although they do have a few.
Obviously they have RLC channels that don't broadcast with the Playboy banner for the mature and girls generally associated with the Playboy image to appear on, but they still need a good supply of young nubile gorgeous Playboy types imo that people associate with the Playboy brand for their 902 channel, which they don't seem to have a lot of .
does playboy tv have any intention of broadcasting on freeview? the coming soon logo seems to have been up for ages. I would also have thought that there was a golden opportunity for them to launch a pay for view encrypted channel featuring,as mr mystery put it,playboy types.there seems to be a really good business opportunity.since the demise of a neighbouring channel of this nature.theres nothing that features good looking girls on encrypted tv live shows.id tune in most nights to something like this.is it to do with dutch licenses and stuff? im not really up on this sort of thing.seems barmy that flicking through tv channels the other night I came across a programme about porn on I think was channel 4 and was surprised to see images more explicit than the stuff that was being shown on any of the so called adult channels.makes me wonder if we are heading for 2014 or 1914.
(23-10-2013 16:12 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]For a company allowed to broadcast a show using the Playboy name they probably employ the least amount of girls associated with the Playboy image these days of all the channels imo, although they do have a few.
Obviously they have RLC channels that don't broadcast with the Playboy banner for the mature and girls generally associated with the Playboy image to appear on, but they still need a good supply of young nubile gorgeous Playboy types imo that people associate with the Playboy brand for their 902 channel, which they don't seem to have a lot of .
It's a good point, I only take the PB association to suggest #902 is like the main stage, with the other 3 channels being of decreasing importance; so you get 'star' acts on 902 (Dannii H, Lucy Z, etc) which made last night with Cherri Hart prioritised over Lu-Z and Ava so interesting.

Or I could be wrong Blush
(23-10-2013 21:56 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]I only take the PB association to suggest #902 is like the main stage, with the other 3 channels being of decreasing importance

I think channel 902 is Playboy's own channel, whereas the other 3 channels although owned by Playboy are rented out to Red Light
This is what winsaw told me and vila when people were asking why only a few certain girls were ever allowed on the old Freeview Playboy TV Chat channel, the freeview channel used to be the same feed as Sky 902 .

(25-06-2012 23:25 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]
(20-06-2012 11:19 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]{edit} While Jemma Jey was still working for RLC/Playboy she didn't appear on freeview either , she is also a busty blond .

your are missing the point mate, its not just if the girl is a busty blond, she needs to have the glamour associated with the playboy look .

(25-06-2012 22:49 )vila Wrote: [ -> ]Even if that is the image they want for the PB channel, it's surely a nonsense for RLC to restrict themselves to just that one stereotype for their Freeview channel, given that they only have one and would benefit from having more options.

its not RLC that restricts themselves, playboy have said what sort of girls they want associated with their name so you are just never going to see some girls on freeview

Phil Barry is the managing director of the Playboy TV Chat channel and the RLC channels i believe, but according to winsaw in his post iv'e quoted Playboy have said what sort of girls they want associated with their name on the PB Chat channel.
(23-10-2013 22:37 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ]I think channel 902 is Playboy's own channel, whereas the other 3 channels although owned by Playboy are rented out to Red Light

playboy don't own the channel RLC do, playboy own the sky channel and rent it to RLC in the same way most of the babe channels broadcast on a channel they don't own,

as for who can and can't go on 902, a good way to think of it is like a franchise, you own it you manage it day to day but their are somethings you have to do eg if you go into a kfc the staff have a kfc uniform on even though that's not who pays them, same here RLC don't have to send a pic off to playboy every time they want to put a new girl on 902 for a yes or no, they just need the girl to meet certain criteria,
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602
Reference URL's