14-10-2013, 17:51
^
RLC, it's not a random drop in picture quality, picture quality in general isn't as good as it used to be not long ago, the same drop in picture quality seems to have affected 3 out of the 4 STD 66 channels as well, there's been some discussion in their section about this, the picture quality seems to have deteriorated on you're channels around the time 3 out of the 4 STD 66 channels moved onto the same frequency as you're's . see posts below
Iv'e quoted the posts made in the STD 66 section were you're channels also get a mention here because if some forum members see you in the STD 66 section speculation will be rife as what you're up to lol .
Anyway i wonder if the picture quality seeming getting worse is because more channels have recently been put on the same Satellite frequency's as you're's like i suggested in my above post made today in the STD 66 section ?, and this is having a adverse effect on all channels not just you're's broadcasting on that frequency ? .
PS, There's been a few other posts made somewhere on the forum (i can't remember were they are) that mentions the not so good picture quality of the RLC channels these days .
RLC, it's not a random drop in picture quality, picture quality in general isn't as good as it used to be not long ago, the same drop in picture quality seems to have affected 3 out of the 4 STD 66 channels as well, there's been some discussion in their section about this, the picture quality seems to have deteriorated on you're channels around the time 3 out of the 4 STD 66 channels moved onto the same frequency as you're's . see posts below
(14-10-2013 09:14 )bunnybc Wrote: [ -> ]Picture quality monitor - last night 912 was better, 927, 938 and 941 still terrible. I'm presuming that those, like me, who are noticing the difference have large, modern TVs where as those that can't see a change have not? I find it strange that RLC has also dropped in quality, is this a technical issue across the '900s' or is it a cost saving exercise that S66 and RLC have taken advantage of?
(14-10-2013 09:57 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ](14-10-2013 09:14 )bunnybc Wrote: [ -> ]Picture quality monitor - last night 912 was better, 927, 938 and 941 still terrible. I'm presuming that those, like me, who are noticing the difference have large, modern TVs where as those that can't see a change have not? I find it strange that RLC has also dropped in quality, is this a technical issue across the '900s' or is it a cost saving exercise that S66 and RLC have taken advantage of?
I can see the difference and I'm using an old CRT widescreen. The drop in resolution could be a cost-saving exercise or it might be related to the recent changes brought about by a new satellite coming on stream and the old one being pensioned off. Perhaps not everything is back to normal yet.
(14-10-2013 11:20 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]The drop in picture quality definitely coincided with channels 927, 938 and 941 moving to different frequency's, 912 is on a completely different frequency and doesn't seem to have been affected, channels 927,938 and 941 have been put onto the same frequency's as the Playboy encrypted channels and the RLC/Playboy TV Chat channels, Chat Girl and Asian connections also use this frequency as does Storm . It's a bad frequency and always has been, Bang Babes used to broadcast one channel before they got their licence revoked from the playboy frequency and that channel was always a worse picture quality than the other 2 that were their own and broadcast on a different frequency (912, 959) .
This frequency seems to be week in strength, whenever the whether is really bad all channels using the same frequency's as Playboy are always the first to be affected with picture break up .
At one time not long ago only the Playboy licensed group of channels used to broadcast on this frequency, but recently other channels have been moved to this frequency including some non adult channels, someone once posted on here that the more channels broadcasting on the same frequency the worse the picture can become, i don't know how true that is, but when channels 931,938 and 941 moved on to the Playboy frequency's the RLC channels became worse as did the STD 66 channels, i can't see how this can just be a coincidence .
Iv'e quoted the posts made in the STD 66 section were you're channels also get a mention here because if some forum members see you in the STD 66 section speculation will be rife as what you're up to lol .
Anyway i wonder if the picture quality seeming getting worse is because more channels have recently been put on the same Satellite frequency's as you're's like i suggested in my above post made today in the STD 66 section ?, and this is having a adverse effect on all channels not just you're's broadcasting on that frequency ? .
PS, There's been a few other posts made somewhere on the forum (i can't remember were they are) that mentions the not so good picture quality of the RLC channels these days .