The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602
I agree with the above; such is the varied nature of the babe channels that there is plenty of choice across the board to cater for most tastes. I have varied tastes in women - Rover is totally correct in saying this has nothing to do with age, size, particular looks etc - and if Foxy does do the night shows (and there are far, far more here on this thread who would like you to do them) then she'll soon find that the only ones who either phone her or make comments on this thread are those with positive things to say about her.

There are plenty of other channels that cater for the tastes of the negative contributors here for them to scour and find who/what they want.

Everyones' entitled to their own view, but coming onto an appreciation thread for a channel and making negative comments doesn't really help anyone, does it? Isn't it far better to go to the thread of a channel/babe you DO like and then make a positive comment about said topic?

I just don't understand this pigeon-holing of all the girls on Red Light Central under some sort of unattractive label; for me it's simple - a woman, regardless of age, body-shape or whatever, either DOES it for me in that indefinable way, or she DOESN'T. And there are plenty of girls who are undeniably pretty but who, for some reason, just do not DO it for me, whilst other, far less obviously attractive women DO do it for me, and vice versa. It all boils down to simply personal taste.
(15-01-2011 17:43 )lindor Wrote: [ -> ]Everyones' entitled to their own view, but coming onto an appreciation thread for a channel and making negative comments doesn't really help anyone, does it? Isn't it far better to go to the thread of a channel/babe you DO like and then make a positive comment about said topic?

Just to clarify a point; this is a discussion thread - members are welcome to appreciate or criticise (within the boundaries set by forum rules).

That said, smelltheroses' post had little to do with this channel itself and more to do with his assessment of its viewers' preferences, including a dated, regurgitated generalisation that people who phone the channels should instead go out and find a real person - as if the two are somehow mutually exclusive. However, with that in mind, I fail to see how his post was criticising the girls or the channel - and therefore what bearing it has on Foxy doing a night show or that it suggests she might be 'slated' if she were to.
Well put Skateguy, Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and has the right to voice that opinion, as long as it's done in a non abusive or insulting way.

If all negative comments or criticism were removed, then this would no longer be a forum, in the true sense of the word.

And on a lighter note, if all negative posts were removed, there would be certain members who would have no posts left. laugh
very true. if i'm not a fan of one of the girls or whatever i jut don't watch them and don't post on them simple. i love all kinds of women but their personality is most important. physical attributes are a welcome bonus but not a neccesity. but like it's been said everyone has and is entitled to an opinion. whether they should share it is a different matter. i could go on but you don't want me rattling on all night.

oh and foxy i would love for you to do a night show you are great personality wise you are a laugh on this forum. lets see how dirty you can be now!!!!
there have been occasions when one performer does it for me one night and then does not do it for me on another night.

if they are all the same then is forum, channels and life would be boring. there are some beautiful women who are a bitch and the unattractive ones are delight to with and visa versa.

it comes down to how the person comes across.
Thanks to all you guys for your wonderful comments and amazing support.

Love
Foxy xxxx




(15-01-2011 10:20 )bigguy01 Wrote: [ -> ]
(15-01-2011 03:03 )Foxy 911 Wrote: [ -> ]Well, well, I hope the girls aren't reading these comments!!!

It doesn't do anyone any good reading negative stuff like this!!!! And it's un-necessary!

Looks like I'll be re-thinking my decision to go ahead with a night show if I'm likely to be slated for doing it!!!!

All that said, you're entitled to your opinion.

Foxy

foxy do not let one person ruin your plans for a night show, those that like you will love it if you did a night show.
(15-01-2011 19:45 )skateguy Wrote: [ -> ]
(15-01-2011 17:43 )lindor Wrote: [ -> ]Everyones' entitled to their own view, but coming onto an appreciation thread for a channel and making negative comments doesn't really help anyone, does it? Isn't it far better to go to the thread of a channel/babe you DO like and then make a positive comment about said topic?

Just to clarify a point; this is a discussion thread - members are welcome to appreciate or criticise (within the boundaries set by forum rules).

That said, smelltheroses' post had little to do with this channel itself and more to do with his assessment of its viewers' preferences, including a dated, regurgitated generalisation that people who phone the channels should instead go out and find a real person - as if the two are somehow mutually exclusive. However, with that in mind, I fail to see how his post was criticising the girls or the channel - and therefore what bearing it has on Foxy doing a night show or that it suggests she might be 'slated' if she were to.

In his earlier post Smell The Roses did say that Red Light Central was a collection of women who no right minded person would wish to view/phone etc; this could be construed as an insult to the ladies of said channel.

However, Skateguy is right in saying that as this is a discussion thread, rather than an appreciation thread, then ofcourse his views are as relevant as anyone else's.
Don't you find it weird clicking on the RLC section and seeing threads for Tori, Dannii, Dionne....
I was just thinking now that Red Light uses 2 night night time live show feeds 911 and 902 (948 being the same has 902 ) they really need a minimum of 3 girls on the night shows to ensure the girls don't have to do such long shifts and ensure each channels always has a different girl on to the other channel , some of the more energetic girls must be knackered at the end of the long night shifts , also they could do the occasional 2-4-1 when the girls change over . It must be a bit of a culture shock for some of the girls that have moved from other channels were they did shorter sections and had more breaks , it makes sense to keep the girls happy and energised and fresh throughout the long night time hours by giving them plenty of well earned breaks , after all most of their rival channels that have more than 1 channel give their girls more breaks and use more girls . Anyone else think the same or is it just me that thinks this ? .
(16-01-2011 20:37 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]I was just thinking now that Red Light uses 2 night night time live show feeds 911 and 902 (948 being the same has 902 ) they really need a minimum of 3 girls on the night shows to ensure the girls don't have to do such long shifts and ensure each channels always has a different girl on to the other channel , some of the more energetic girls must be knackered at the end of the long night shifts , also they could do the occasional 2-4-1 when the girls change over . It must be a bit of a culture shock for some of the girls that have moved from other channels were they did shorter sections and had more breaks , it makes sense to keep the girls happy and energised and fresh throughout the long night time hours by giving them plenty of well earned breaks , after all most of their rival channels that have more than 1 channel give their girls more breaks and use more girls . Anyone else think the same or is it just me that thinks this ? .

Totally agree with you there. It's frustrating to sometimes see the same girl on two - or even three - stations at the same time. If the stations occupy so much television space then it's only fair that they should employ more girls as this would help both the girls, who'd benefit from a well-earned break, and the viewer, who'd have more of a choice.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602
Reference URL's