The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602
I think Redlight are well aware of good constructive criticism, but its always good to give credit where credit is due, and for me redlight/playboy have really been improving there quality of there showsSmile
I would like to know with regard to Ofcom, what plans if any do RLC have in place to tackle the current censorship problem. As far as the models go, yes Redlight have a terrific roster but as good as Lucy Summers was the other night it was anything but a classic compared to what we were getting from her this time last year so that's the reason I'd like RLC to confirm whether or not they have any plans in place for future improvements such as the Ofcom question, it's all very well RLC saying how grateful they are to recieve praise, I think we all on this forum would also like the ultimate question answered Cool
Very true mate, you have posed the ultimate question to them, lets hope we get a definitive answerImportant
(22-02-2012 23:40 )continental19 Wrote: [ -> ]
(22-02-2012 23:35 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: [ -> ]I would suggest that 90% of posts praise RLC.It would be wrong to ignore contructive criticism,which you can use to improve your product.Would you prefer us to pretend that you get everything right ?

I think Redlight are well aware of good constructive criticism

I don't think that using Bounce is being well aware of constructive criticism... It's more like sticking up a finger at the post..

I think that we need a fingers in the ears smiley for their rep.
[Image: 2011-04-29_095644_smiley_fingers_in_ears.gif]
(22-02-2012 23:21 )redlight central Wrote: [ -> ]some posters are never happy and always critical but still use this forum bladewave

Because that's what a forum is for, sharing your views on a product or topic; good and bad.
i agee but there is a difference between constuctive and distructive
most posters are balenced , but some are always negative
(22-02-2012 23:35 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: [ -> ]
(22-02-2012 23:21 )redlight central Wrote: [ -> ]Thank you ,some posters are never happy and always critical but still use this forum bladewave ,it very refreshing to have people like yourself that apriciate the work we have done and enjoy the shows we salute you ,
(22-02-2012 20:56 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ]
(22-02-2012 13:26 )continental19 Wrote: [ -> ]
I would suggest that 90% of posts praise RLC.It would be wrong to ignore contructive criticism,which you can use to improve your product.Would you prefer us to pretend that you get everything right ?
(23-02-2012 09:28 )redlight central Wrote: [ -> ]i agee but there is a difference between constuctive and distructive
most posters are balenced , but some are always negative

Let's be honest and admit that this is a fair comment. Most posters who criticise are constructive in their criticism, but some are always negative in whatever they post (and this doesn't just apply to redlight by the way, elsewhere in the forum you can see the same thing, where posters aren't trying to be constructive at all but are just negative in everything they post).
Red have brought in more new girls and used more sets then the other channels. We all have our opinions on who is the best girls to watch in a way we are all right Smile
(23-02-2012 09:28 )redlight central Wrote: [ -> ]i agee but there is a difference between constuctive and distructive
most posters are balenced , but some are always negative

Bounce
Look, if we see what Redlight/Playboy has achieved in just over a year,with more channels, more sexy babes, different sets, etc, to me it's confirmation that they are here to stay for the long haul. Now we all no the situation with Ofcom, which put a spanner in the works, but i feel redlight are doing the best they can under the circumstances .
Scottishbloke raised a very valid point about the situation concerning ofcom whether or not we get an answer back form redlight concerning this matter i guess we'll just have to watch this spaceImportant
One matter which does concern me, is the issue concerning Lucy summers? in my opinion she is the sexiest Babe on TV, yet it seems for whatever reason Lucy has been given less and less night shifts and I don't no why?? For me Lucy should be on a minimum of at least 3 night shows a week if not more. Yet it seems for whatever reason that Redlight seem to be reluctant to give her more shows?
Sorry to use the footballing terms here, but it's like Barcelona going a goal down, and then the coach decides to bring on his star striker Lionel Messi, and everybody are scratching there heads thinking why didn't he bring him on from the start?
Well thats how i feel concerning Lucy, a Babe of this Magnitude can't afford to be doing the odd day show here and there, Lucy will always be a night time babe and thats where she belongs. So i hope Redlight take my points as constructive criticism, and i hope they sort this matter out soon

Thankyou.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602
Reference URL's