(13-02-2012 11:17 )dibs2k9 Wrote: [ -> ]just looked on rlc schedule and it says jenna is on tomorrow does anyone know if that is jenna hoskins back or not thx
I reckon its supposed to read Jenn, for Jennifer Jade but i could be wrong :-)
(13-02-2012 10:53 )babefinder Wrote: [ -> ] (13-02-2012 10:28 )twistedmango Wrote: [ -> ]Pretty sure that if you had £100k of your own money taken from you in a fine you'd err on the side of caution too.
Er, Lucy Summers was the reason RLC got fined.
As for the far out shots i prefer the wide shots as you can see more, too many close-ups spoil it for me, but as usual no channel can please all the people all the time.
Lucy Summers was not the girl that had the accidental slip while using the hand thong technique when the girl lost her balance and flashed resulting in Ofcom finding Playboy "in breach" for the incident last April , and that's a fact .
(13-02-2012 14:59 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]Lucy Summers was not the girl that had the accidental slip while using the hand thong technique when the girl lost her balance and flashed resulting in Ofcom finding Playboy "in breach" for the incident last April , and that's a fact .
Then i bow down to your superior knowledge of the facts. I was told that it was LS, albeit unsubstantiated, who was the reason RLC got the fine, hand thong or otherwise, clearly i am wrong.
Last night after hearing plenty of praise for RLC's new girl Kandi I thought I would take a look at what all the fuss was about. And yes I agree she is a pretty girl, but the actual performance was neither better or worse than any other girl. In her favour though she was wearing a tiny pair of white panties, not see-through but sheer just the same, allowing the viewer the sight of a very modest camel-toe and no more, but in these puritanical times that is that is very daring. She had been on barely an hour, when suddenly she stopped what she was doing, waved at the camera and left the screen. Which was then taken over by a girl in mock bondage gear, and surrounded by trappings of the same, a cage and leather straps hung on a wall. But after ten minutes Kandi came back. 'But hang on' she was now wearing black panties, nothing like as sexy as the white ones she had on when she left. She had not crossed any of Ofcoms guidelines, but still she had changed, and from that moment any appeal she had just vanished. But by now we should all know why RLC pull these stunts, it is not the first time that I have seen it done.
Millie needs her arse busted,that should put across what i think of millie
always gets naked at some point of her show too,she would look better on handheld cam tho......
Imo mellie is one of the best ladies to watch
(13-02-2012 03:00 )bobjohnson51 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2012 23:09 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]It's an ex-Babestation take over tonight...
Anyone who's just come back off their holidays must wonder whats happened..
What did happen? I was pleasantly surprised to see three of four channels on their "superstream" had BS babes on them. Were they stolen fair and square w/ a bigger paycheck or did they get pissed off and leave BS?
Were not stolen lets just say they were not in BS plans. that said they seem to be enjoying themselves so maybe all of us are winners in this situation mind you sure in the long run The Girls RLC and us viewers will be the winners
(13-02-2012 15:30 )twistedmango Wrote: [ -> ] (13-02-2012 14:59 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]Lucy Summers was not the girl that had the accidental slip while using the hand thong technique when the girl lost her balance and flashed resulting in Ofcom finding Playboy "in breach" for the incident last April , and that's a fact .
Then i bow down to your superior knowledge of the facts. I was told that it was LS, albeit unsubstantiated, who was the reason RLC got the fine, hand thong or otherwise, clearly i am wrong.
Well whoever told you that is wrong , for a start like i have said 1 of the "in breach" rulings against Playboy/RLC that contributed to the large fine was made by another girl that lost her balance while sitting on the back of a lounger style seat using the hand thong technique , she removed her covering hand to save herself falling backward , so ended up revealing all , this incident is on Ofcoms website and is described in detail , the girl responsible for this "in breach" ruling was
not Lucy S , Lucy did say herself on this forum that she had been the target of malicious complaints , so it's possible that she could have been one of the girls that was mentioned in other "in breach" rulings
I don't think it is fair to single a RLC girl as being responsible for the large fine , the fine was for a combination of things , the complaints and "in breach" rulings were made against various girls and on different nights .
Ofcom say themselves that they look at past compliance records of company's found "in breech" when deciding what sort of punishment or fine to dish out , past discretion's contribute to higher fines , Playboy have a bad past compliance record , Bangbabe and Elite TV program's both got found in breach while using Playboys licence thus contributing to Playboy's bad compliance record , Playboy themselves have been found "in breach" many times in the past for wrong doings on their own encrypted channels , all this was taken into account when dishing out the last fine , so it's unfair to say the girls producers etc at RLC are solely responsible for the fine , the overall fine was a combination of many things and not just because of what was shown on the RLC channels .
Thank you to who ever is responsible for friday's night show schedule
