(24-10-2014 23:47 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]The adverts are a sad development
What's the big deal? It's a 30 second ad.
Babestation have been doing exactly the same thing for years.
(24-10-2014 23:54 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ] (24-10-2014 23:47 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]The adverts are a sad development
What's the big deal? It's a 30 second ad.
Babestation have been doing exactly the same thing for years.
The channels should strive to be better than the opposition in a clean fight and not just a carbon copy
(24-10-2014 23:54 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ]What's the big deal? It's a 30 second ad.
Clearly you've never had to endure one while on a call, especially when you've just asked her to do something for you.
(24-10-2014 23:54 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ]Babestation have been doing exactly the same thing for years.
Ah, well, that makes it ok then
the ads are30 sec at the moment and will be shorter in the next week or so and at present are playing about once every 45 mins
(24-10-2014 23:54 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ] (24-10-2014 23:47 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]The adverts are a sad development
What's the big deal? It's a 30 second ad.
Babestation have been doing exactly the same thing for years.
I'd prefer to see the channels with a few adverts bringing in the money than no channels.
(25-10-2014 10:49 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]I'd prefer to see the channels with a few adverts bringing in the money than no channels.
This is a fair point no one wants the channels to vanish they could be a whole lot better and could have some guts but at least we have something. But they got this far without ads so they are not necessary imo
Times are hard and they have to attract the best quality babes, the ads are a small price to pay at least RLC don't continually plug downloading photos to your mobile, scheduling might be better though like when a call is finished go to the ad the come back on the mike to entice us to call in although it's probably on an auto timer.
(25-10-2014 03:49 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ] (24-10-2014 23:54 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ]Babestation have been doing exactly the same thing for years.
Ah, well, that makes it ok then
That's a misquote.
I didn't say it was OK. I don't see it as OK at all, I'd rather not have ads, but as I said it's not a big deal.
When Babestation ran the Babestation Starlets channel WITHOUT any ad interruptions, the amount of favourable comment that move got here was virtually zero. Nobody seemed to appreciate the improvement. So like I said the issue of ads would appear to be no big deal. When Babestation take the ads off from one of their channels nobody cared.