25-11-2010, 12:17
possibly but not sure as only 1 babe has gone elle, who wasnt on that much on the pad otherwise all babes still there and will need to be when the channels come back tomorrow (hopefully)
(25-11-2010 11:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]stop blaming ofcom. if it was ofcom, it would have been announced in one of their bulletins they were taking the channels away. also they would have taken all the bang channels of the air not just 2.Firstly Ofcom never give out bulletins until quite some time after the event and secondly OFcom do not give out bulletins concerning channels with non Ofcom UK licences , all ofcom can do is refer any complaints to the country that supplied the Licence , in Bangmedia's case Holland , if the country that granted the licence does not see anything wrong with what the channel is showing and Ofcom do think what is being shown is far to explicit then Ofcom can ask Sky/freeview to remove the channel from their EPG or block the broadcast being shown on freeview . The advantage of a over seas licence is the fact that Ofcom cannot give out any fines or state what beaches have been made concerning Ofcom's adult channel code of conduct because channels with say a Dutch licence have to adhere to the code of conduct supplied by the country that granted them the licence and not Ofcom .
bang have consistently said its technical problems and i believe them until otherwise proved. yes bang have been fined by ofcom but no announcements about removing channels stop these conspiracy theories.
also all channels have a spell where they are really hot and pushing the boundaries and then followed by a spell of being quieter and seems bang are in the quieter.
(25-11-2010 12:30 )bigguy01 Wrote: [ -> ]true but how come jet and alex adams are not on any more. plus sammie will be nights soons. fernanda nights for december soon. i wont be surprise if they go web only content with different webstreams for different tastes eg daytime content on webstream, on another sexstation type content.
(25-11-2010 12:30 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ](25-11-2010 11:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]stop blaming ofcom. if it was ofcom, it would have been announced in one of their bulletins they were taking the channels away. also they would have taken all the bang channels of the air not just 2.Firstly Ofcom never give out bulletins until quite some time after the event and secondly OFcom do not give out bulletins concerning channels with non Ofcom UK licences , all ofcom can do is refer any complaints to the country that supplied the Licence , in Bangmedia's case Holland , if the country that granted the licence does not see anything wrong with what the channel is showing and Ofcom do think what is being shown is far to explicit then Ofcom can ask Sky/freeview to remove the channel from their EPG or block the broadcast being shown on freeview . The advantage of a over seas livence is the fact that Ofcom cannot give out any fines or state what beaches have been made concerning Ofcom's adult channel code of conduct because channels with say a Dutch licence have to adhere to the code of conduct supplied by the country that granted them the licence and not Ofcom .
bang have consistently said its technical problems and i believe them until otherwise proved. yes bang have been fined by ofcom but no announcements about removing channels stop these conspiracy theories.
also all channels have a spell where they are really hot and pushing the boundaries and then followed by a spell of being quieter and seems bang are in the quieter.
(25-11-2010 12:53 )bigguy01 Wrote: [ -> ]everybody loves a good comeback. rocky, luke skywalker, liverpool champions league final 2005, man utd (i hate them) against bayern munich at the nou camp, lance armstrong etc.
(25-11-2010 12:43 )Mr Head Wrote: [ -> ]The 2 channels that have been removed from the Sky (912 , 959) have in the last few weeks been "allegedly" granted a Dutch adult licence , the fines Bangmedia were given were when they still had the UK Ofcom licence , plus Sky Ch 902 still has the UK licence so is still subject to Ofcom fines and rulings(25-11-2010 12:30 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ](25-11-2010 11:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]stop blaming ofcom. if it was ofcom, it would have been announced in one of their bulletins they were taking the channels away. also they would have taken all the bang channels of the air not just 2.Firstly Ofcom never give out bulletins until quite some time after the event and secondly OFcom do not give out bulletins concerning channels with non Ofcom UK licences , all ofcom can do is refer any complaints to the country that supplied the Licence , in Bangmedia's case Holland , if the country that granted the licence does not see anything wrong with what the channel is showing and Ofcom do think what is being shown is far to explicit then Ofcom can ask Sky/freeview to remove the channel from their EPG or block the broadcast being shown on freeview . The advantage of a over seas licence is the fact that Ofcom cannot give out any fines or state what beaches have been made concerning Ofcom's adult channel code of conduct because channels with say a Dutch licence have to adhere to the code of conduct supplied by the country that granted them the licence and not Ofcom .
bang have consistently said its technical problems and i believe them until otherwise proved. yes bang have been fined by ofcom but no announcements about removing channels stop these conspiracy theories.
also all channels have a spell where they are really hot and pushing the boundaries and then followed by a spell of being quieter and seems bang are in the quieter.
Am I missing something ? I thought Bangmedia had already been fined..