The UK Babe Channels Forum

(23-11-2010 21:19 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]I still think the removal of the channels is Ofcom related , it can't be a fibre-connection fault because the channels never stopped transmitting and are still transmitting , they just got removed from the Sky EPG , and you can manually tune them in , i don't think it has any thing to do with non payment of fines like some people have suggested because Tease Me Tv is still transmitting it's services on 3 day time channels 902 , 911 , 915 and 2 night time shows 902 , 911 , so Bangmedia would also have been prevented from earning money and transmitting on these channels . So why did Ch 902 not also get removed ? i have just checked and the licence holder/parent company of 902 is NOT Playboy , the company that holds the licence for Sky Ch 902 is BANGMEDIA . The only difference i can see is that 912 and 959 got re-branded from the usual Tease Me TV name to TMTN1 and TMTN2 and now have allegedly a Dutch licence whereas 902 still has the UK licence , i still think it's this loophole that they have supposedly got on 912 and probably 959 that has been the problem , i think the Dutch licence allows them to go further than the UK licence , Ofcom probably don't agree with a more explicit shows so they have instructed Sky to remove the Sky EPGs for the Dutch licenced channels . the proof will be if or when the channels come back , will they be as explicit as they were before they got removed and will they still be TMTN1 and TMTN2 or will they come back as Tease Me Tv , if they come back tame and if they come back as Tease Me Tv , then you can bet your bottom Dollar that it is Ofcom that has been the cause of the channels getting removed and may well have instructed Bangmedia to apply for a Uk licence in order to transmit their shows on Sky's EPG . I think this could also be the problem with the freeview show if it also has the dutch licence , Ofcom may well have instructed the freeview tech guy's to block the signal and it may not be the fact that the freeview show time shares with Sky owned FV 20 .

Makes sense to me.

(23-11-2010 21:53 )teewee Wrote: [ -> ]

(23-11-2010 21:19 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]I still think the removal of the channels is Ofcom related , it can't be a fibre-connection fault because the channels never stopped transmitting and are still transmitting , they just got removed from the Sky EPG , and you can manually tune them in , i don't think it has any thing to do with non payment of fines like some people have suggested because Tease Me Tv is still transmitting it's services on 3 day time channels 902 , 911 , 915 and 2 night time shows 902 , 911 , so Bangmedia would also have been prevented from earning money and transmitting on these channels . So why did Ch 902 not also get removed ? i have just checked and the licence holder/parent company of 902 is NOT Playboy , the company that holds the licence for Sky Ch 902 is BANGMEDIA . The only difference i can see is that 912 and 959 got re-branded from the usual Tease Me TV name to TMTN1 and TMTN2 and now have allegedly a Dutch licence whereas 902 still has the UK licence , i still think it's this loophole that they have supposedly got on 912 and probably 959 that has been the problem , i think the Dutch licence allows them to go further than the UK licence , Ofcom probably don't agree with a more explicit shows so they have instructed Sky to remove the Sky EPGs for the Dutch licenced channels . the proof will be if or when the channels come back , will they be as explicit as they were before they got removed and will they still be TMTN1 and TMTN2 or will they come back as Tease Me Tv , if they come back tame and if they come back as Tease Me Tv , then you can bet your bottom Dollar that it is Ofcom that has been the cause of the channels getting removed and may well have instructed Bangmedia to apply for a Uk licence in order to transmit their shows on Sky's EPG . I think this could also be the problem with the freeview show if it also has the dutch licence , Ofcom may well have instructed the freeview tech guy's to block the signal and it may not be the fact that the freeview show time shares with Sky owned FV 20 .

Makes sense to me.

Me too

Opening up tonight with Donna and Lilly

If SKY pulled the plug at the behest of OFCOM wouldn't it be a good idea for someone to get that confirmed? Nature may abore a vacuum but the internet loves one.

Best possible outcome, the channels come back this friday and they pick up again for where they left off and everybody's happy again I mean after all its getting close to Christmas now the season of good will to all. If's it ofcom or SKY stop acting the c**t or you will be getting a visit from the 3 ghosts this Christmas.

Just a thought, if they were put off the EPGs for good (whats the freeview story?) could they behave more badly?

This has been posted in the "Open letter" thread within the past half-hour

FURTHER STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF BANG MEDIA

Dear mr williams

This is a direct response to the concern you have expressed on the current issues with Sky channels 912 and 959 and Freeview channel 98.

At this time we would like to thank you and all the forum members and fans for their interest, concern and comments made in this distinguished forum.

We are unfortunately still trying to resolve said technical problem but we may have made some headway with the situation and hope to be back on air as soon as possible. At the current time I am unable to provide you with a concrete timescale as to when this will happen.

I understand that there are plenty of conspiracy theories being thrown around but let me assure you that unlike JFK, Elvis, Area 51 and other controversies this is simply a technical problem. All our team are currently working as hard as possible trying to resolve this issue.

Any other causes are simply fictitious, so as far as we are concerned please consider all other theories quashed. Having said this we can all appreciate your frustration and we are fully aware that until a full resolution occurs they will always rumble on. Let me reassure you though that everything that can be done is being done.

I direct you to our first statement to this forum when we said that there may be no quick fix as much as we would like there to be.

We understand that you are all itching to see our beautiful girls back on your screens on these channels ASAP as are we. Please bear with us for the time being and we will update you once we know more on the situation.

Our sincere apologies to any of you who feel aggrieved by these circumstances but know that it will be something very much to look forward to WHEN they are back and running at full steam again.

We would also like it noted that we value our customers and your continued support and appreciation of all our channels is very much appreciated by the company and the girls alike.

Many thanks and we hope to have some good news for everyone as soon as possible.


So there we have it!

This was a major concern of mine with the one BangBabe channel being available and not enough time for the majority of girls to perform, we have lilly & Donna Duke on when there are beta performers like Tommie Jo, Adele Lucy summers for example who will perfrom beta strip right down to there knickers even go naked and they are not on :-( a totally turn off

(24-11-2010 00:02 )mrichie10 Wrote: [ -> ]This was a major concern of mine with the one BangBabe channel being available and not enough time for the majority of girls to perform, we have lilly & Donna Duke on when there are beta performers like Tommie Jo, Adele Lucy summers for example who will perfrom beta strip right down to there knickers even go naked and they are not on :-( a totally turn off

I agree. Breasts are great, but I need fully nude women to really grab my attention.

From this response, our favorite shows will not be tamed. I am however skeptical.