Didnt catch Evelyn's show but caught her on cams not too long ago and she was unreal. Plenty of chat interaction and up for lots of action. Others on cam - well lets just say they were more interested in trying to get me into dull conversations so that they could just lay there and type!!!! I think to label her the laziest girl is a little extreme as there are others far, far worse.
Actually Shandyhand has a very interesting point which is new - it only happened tonight - and I think it merits discussion, unlike the perpetual moaning about exactly the same nothingness which leads nowhere and just causes argument and bad feelings.
Tonight Evelyn was asked, for substantial tips, to take her skirt off before 10 pm. She reckoned she couldn't do this on TV but when told that Heather had done it previously, she called her manager in and he told her she could not do it. There has been much previous debate about whether Evelyn is prevented from doing things other girls do - we have complained on here about her being taken off screen for apparently little or nothing, and others have said this on the S 66 chat line too.
So, is it correct that Heather took her skirt off on TV before 10 pm? And what do we read into this? Is this more evidence of some sort of discrimination? Or is it a case of management closely watching some girls and not others? I would be interested in your views.
(01-03-2019 00:20 )T Bone Wrote: [ -> ] (01-03-2019 00:08 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]If guys bothered to check what actually happened on her chat instead of just assuming the worst, they would have seen she got distracted by a big discussion about removing her skirt at the end of the show - something that was ultimately vetoed by the studio manager. It took too long and messed up the end of her session.
oh look, the peter hitchens of the forum has arrived.
your post is the ultimate straw clutch. her shows are identical every time. no distraction can change the fact that she is the laziest girl on the channels.
T bone, why did you choose Popeye - wouldn't Bluto be more appropriate?
(01-03-2019 00:37 )nottooold Wrote: [ -> ]T bone, why did you choose Popeye - wouldn't Bluto be more appropriate?
you called me a troll
why did you choose a naked baby?
(01-03-2019 00:32 )Oldmand Wrote: [ -> ]I think to label her the laziest girl is a little extreme as there are others far, far worse.
nope, no others are worse. teejay is her competition for the laziest girl but purely because evelyn has been lazier for longer i think she deserves that title.
(01-03-2019 00:36 )nottooold Wrote: [ -> ]Actually Shandyhand has a very interesting point
no he doesn't, and never has. you are doing the same as him by clutching at straws. you're comparing her to other girls to make her look less bad. typical white knight tactic. don't waste your time. evelyn has been around long enough to know what a good show is, even if she can only do it after 9pm, why not get off her backside and go put some effort in after 9? all i have asked for all this time is set changes and getting up now and then, she isn't disabled.
the only justification is from the channel if they were to say that she brings in enough calls to not have to make any effort, and that's fine. but if that is the case then why not take her off tv and give her a web only stream all day since she has enough callers, that way she could "tease" all day away from tv and hopefully change her set and use her legs like she did back when she was worth bothering with
I have already said set use I agree 100%; she should do more variety. Movement prior to 9pm I have agreed with too. If you weren't so busy labelling and vilifying people you might see there was less need for exaggeration and hyperbole in your arguments.
And as for Heather yes she did it 100%. The skirt was taken off onscreen sometime between 9.30 and 10pm. But the key point with hindsight was that she had probably dressed for it in advance - she had a body suit on at the time. But prior to that in a different show she had returned for her 9pm segment (from a break) just wearing a pair of CK underwear as her bottom half. There was no removal onscreen for that show but she wore underwear only for the hour. Both these shows were a month or two back.
Presumably some prods are more lenient than others; some prods more vigilant than others; some babes manage to take advantage; some can't; and who can and will do so changes over time with circumstances. You know cause this is the real world. But hey its easier just to shout 'lazy' very boorishly when some people are actually trying to get more out of the shows by their actions.
(01-03-2019 01:26 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]But hey its easier just to shout 'lazy' very boorishly when some people are actually trying to get more out of the shows by their actions.
there is only one action right now that can change her 'shows' and that is by boycotting and telling her and/or the channel why. i have said this repeatedly, people can't keep calling her and wanting change, you have to stop funding poor shows for them to change, but what do you care since her shows are...
(28-02-2019 17:33 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]the most sensual visions of clothed eroticism I've seen on the shows in ages
you and the rest are the reason why the channels are crap. keep up the forum point scoring peter. sad
^ Do not change what I wrote please I said 20 mins were the best. That is hardly unconditional white knighting. She should do much more like that. She should find new angles and poses and sets to be like that on. She should be more adventurous and not go with what's easy all the time. But...
There are plenty of better babe targets for you ire and you know it. You are only here because Eve is getting praise and her shows are not to your taste. Plus, you think we are all delusional fanboys, you are the right thinking saviour and you fancy an argument. Talk of boycotts is meaningless because guys want too many different things from the shows. Your ideals and standards are no more worthy than any other groups.
Moan where its properly deserved ffs.
(01-03-2019 02:04 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]You are only here because Eve is getting praise and her shows are not to your taste. Plus, you think we are all delusional fanboys, you are the right thinking saviour and you fancy an argument.
no, i'm here because i'm a potential customer and people are ruining these already bad channels by paying for shite and labelling those that want change as trolls.
(01-03-2019 02:04 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]Moan where its properly deserved ffs.
you're showing cracks pete, the opposite of white knighting isn't moaning.
some of us want better shows and are willing to pay, you just want an online battle of wits. keep defending crap all for some forum status, hope you're happy
I said you were moaning because you are. You were the one that referenced white knighting first. I didn't say they were opposites. Please be coherent.
I am defending what I like because I like it and because its what I pay for and what I want to see more of on the shows. The only other reason is because I fail to see why you should get to chose what I should like in your eyes? Please explain why you should for me I'd like a good laugh.
Whilst i can see both sides to this argument (i have had disagreements on other pages about statuesque performances after all) there are a few things i have noticed these past few weeks which for me means i will continue to give Evelyn the benefit of the doubt.
She is active in taking on board comments and feedback with many people on here providing answers to some questions regarding her performances - why she likes one particular set for example. If you were to raise similar concerns to other girls you would likely get a rude response.
Let's also not forget that whenever Evelyn is on screen this is free to view. She is however one of the few i have seen who actually make an effort to spice up the final hour of her show. As i have stated previously she is also very accomodating and willing to perform backstage.
To repeat what has been said earlier on this thread i have also seen her appear to have conversations with the producer to see just exactly what she may or may not show at certain times. I much prefer this type of attitude to other girls on the channel.
Those that have produced the same tired shows for the past few years irrespective of what channel they were working for (different sets and outfits perhaps yes, but monotonous all the same).
Girls you see lay on their side for an entire shift, you know next time on screen they will either be sat on a chair or laid on their front. There are very few that i have seen that actually stand and move around the set.
There are those who lay motionless, looking severely disinterested, rolling their eyes even whenever they are on calls.
There are girls who only last month would be backstage, with no keyboard to be seen, sound on and interacting. These same girls however now lay motionless backstage keyboard in hand (or personal mobile) and go on cams and bitch about other girls and callers / cammers also. Just last night a girl was camming from home ignoring several people who were asking her to either remove her bra or show her face!! Instead she was moaning to one of her regulars about one of her onlyfans subscribers. This only stopped when she posted to state that she would DM him more details on there to have a laugh about later. This for me is even worse as there were customers paying for this service. Do studio not observe the behaviour of girls whilst on cams???
At least when i go backstage or on cams Evelyn produces exceptional value for money. Other girls reported to be 'big' stars on this channel it can be said are stealing a living!!