(03-04-2020 14:29 )nottooold Wrote: [ -> ]Others will recall Evelyn's very popular first night of home camming when she gave a lengthy main cam show, and they thought that this might be the beginning of something special and rewarding for the future. Sadly, the reason for the totally committed main cam show was that the pervcam wasn't working properly, so she chose to make the best of a bad job!
Just to be clear (even if you weren't implying otherwise) the part of the show you refer to was definitely not put on for free: I spent over £600 that day, most of it during the last hour or two, and others were obviously tipping too.
Many more
will have watched without spending a penny though (and considering the spectacle you can hardly blame them for not looking away) and if that's the problem...
How about putting the kind of show we're talking about behind a paywall too?
*sound of pitchforks being sharpened*
Gulp.
Evelyn obviously doesn't mind doing solo porn these days, so long as her face (or her eyes at least) are kept out of it. As good as that is though, there may be some of us that are more keen to put our money towards seeing her face on screen as well as her body
without the kind of explicit display that ought to remain exclusive to the more 'anonymous' perv stream. So instead, a show where nudity is possible, but seeing the naughtiest bits is not.
Pleasingly teasing.
Of course if Evelyn has decided that
any level of nudity with her face on-screen is just not for her anymore, then that's that. A straightforward statement of such would be welcome, in fact.
If a paywalled head-to-toe Evelyn show
isn't out of the question though, some things to consider:
Speaking for myself, I can't really argue against it being priced the same as perv considering I wouldn't regard it as inferior; just different and more to my taste. If I was more interested in perv then the £600+ I spent could have gone towards watching 3+ hours of that instead. (I'm not suggesting that much time should be set aside for what I'm proposing though). A lower rate might be more sensible of course, to attract any kind of viewership comparable to perv. Ultimately, segments like these might not make as much money on their own as perv, but if it's a way to get people spending who wouldn't otherwise then it could still be a worthwhile tool in the arsenal.
If it's technically possible to have the main feed be paywalled, then when practical the perv-cam may as well be left running anyway. There were a few times last year where spectacular shows were put on for both cameras simultaneously, with tips (and a massive number of buzzes when they became a thing) flying in while the stream of perv-credits kept flowing. Hopefully no need to interrupt or step on the perv-cam audience's toes then, and anybody who has a setup (and the funds) to allow watching both streams at the same time should have a lot of fun indeed.
If however, this kind of show is deemed worth a try
but the perv stream is the only one that can be paywalled, then (because recorders and uploaders are unfortunately a fact of life) that stream should be stopped and restarted to at least keep the tamer footage separate from the explicit.
When to do it? I suppose it could be done in an hour or so leading up to switching to an exclusively perv-based show where she can really go full-frontal and wild.
So then, who wants to be the one that puts the noose around my neck?
Oh, and before you kick the stool from beneath my feet, a disclaimer: none of this is meant to be taken as telling anybody how to spend their money or how to do their jobs. It's just a (long-winded) suggestion. Thinking out loud. An idea posted on a forum where such things are shared. But please do pick it apart and point out the flaws in the logic so we can nip this disaster-waiting-to-happen in the bud!
fingers crossed she in a good mood