I have to say on the plus side Camilla was good but Tiffany was
mostly boring,i think Camilla should have apeared with someone more open like PRIYA or Michelle Thorne
(13-10-2012 15:17 )SteveHG Wrote: [ -> ]I haven't been able to see any shows but from what people have kindly described it seems to be going the wrong way already.
I've no problem with having little scenarios and new sets (always good to have variety) and the principle of using BS girls is a good one, BUT...
this shouldn't be an excuse to take the piss!
For £5 you should expect to seem proper nudity and/or some serious interaction between the girls (preferably both). Keeping all your clothes on and just larking about on the set, or remaining motionless in order not to show anything really isn't on.
Obviously we're going to see differences from show to show given the different girls that are on and how far they're prepared to go but we should be able to expect a minimum level of filth for our money. If a girl doesn't do full frontal, fair enough, but then they ought to be prepared to do a hot 2-4-1 or whatever to compensate.
which again is why i think babestation should look into signing some new girls who are willing to show all, that way people cant moan about them not being a babestation girl, as they would be, secondly people that pay for x would be able to see full on nudity ect..
Ok its advertising Lori for tonight, should i take once last chance? Or give my five spot to charity?
(13-10-2012 16:33 )westie2k Wrote: [ -> ]Ok its advertising Lori for tonight, should i take once last chance? Or give my five spot to charity?
Im a fortune teller. Give me your fiver, and i will tell you what you will see tonight!!! hmm...i see bullshit! Lol.
(13-10-2012 13:08 )westie2k Wrote: [ -> ]Yes and still with the same girls, not to the same extremes ironically enough , but its still there.
What are they currently promising then? When I've seen BabesttaionX being promoted it's been in quite vague terms witout any specific promises being made. Have I missed some specific promises being made?
(13-10-2012 15:53 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]I have to say on the plus side Camilla was good but Tiffany was
mostly boring,i think Camilla should have apeared with someone more open like PRIYA or Michelle Thorne
the real reason behind this is because if they had of only advertised camilla,not so many people would have subscribed. Tifanny was the "attraction" that made people think its worth a fiver. boy were they wrong. not to say theres anything wrong with camilla. its just that we have come to expect it from her. therefore less of an attraction to pay a fiver to see camilla naked.....AGAIN!
Was wondering there are three shows each night but how long are they for, an hour?
(13-10-2012 18:02 )welshman25 Wrote: [ -> ]Was wondering there are three shows each night but how long are they for, an hour?
There's 9 shows a night, 20 minutes each.
mean the live shows, usally an hour fom 11:30pm to 00:30
(13-10-2012 16:33 )westie2k Wrote: [ -> ]Ok its advertising Lori for tonight, should i take once last chance? Or give my five spot to charity?
You can throw £5 in the bin to experince the feeling you will have after seeing the show tonight, the best part is that unlike if you pay for the show you will be able to retrieve your money from the bin.
My advice, go to the pub and buy a pint or two.