(28-12-2012 20:53 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote: [ -> ] (28-12-2012 19:10 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought some of last nights show was ok,however Geri did not orgasm it was faked using the buckby method,on top of this Camilla`s attitude towards some of the texters was apalling,she should remember that without these people who have all parted with 6.50 she would not have a job,so they should be treated politely and not told to f*** off just because she does not agree with their opinion.
Has she directly aimed an insult at you or told you to "fuck off"? if you didn't send her any message that would offend her then why worry about it.
How do you even know what kind of txts Camilla was responding to? Why should she treat people politely if they are being rude or disrespectful to her?, Yes she might be a glamour model/pornstar but at the end of the day she is acting and at work, she has feelings the same as you and me.
Yes people have paid money to see the show and it contributes to her wages, but why would she go out of her way and break the rules and do something thats not allowed just to please some jerk texting in with possible mindless requests and put her own job and the channel as a whole at risk?
If people are texting in constantly telling her to squirt, piss, finger her ass, eat pussy ect ect which we all know isn't allowed anyway on BSX, then people start slagging her of with abusive txts because they aren't getting what they want of course she's going to get fed up.
If people are paying for BSX to see this kind of thing they are mistaken and should use some common sense before buying the show.
totally agree with Fernandez Esperenda being polite and civil is a two way thing I cant believe that Camilla was rude with out reason If i went into a shop as a customer and was repeatedly really abusive to the shop keeper i couldnt expect a civil reply ! nothing to do with agreeing with their opinion
Fernandez points are of course right but just don't like when some of these girls just ignore the texts, some texts are not even asking for crazy shit and they still get ignored, also maybe people's fustration is that this is pin protected yet some girls wont even show pussy, no one can justify Maddison for example appearing on there, there is nothing extreme about the show no more, it's just put in place so viewers can see their favourite girl bare all, Most bizaare thing is girls agree to appear on the show but refrain from doing the basic requirement
Concerning the text messages, i sent in a few the night before last that were in no way nasty or bad in anyway, non got read out or put to screen, So when Camilla came on the mic and told the viewers that if she didn't agree with a text she wouldn't read it out so "fuck off" (her words) i thought mine would be shown and read out but they weren't , not sure why, i also sent one in last night as well , i didn't see it read out or put to screen , i actually asked if a bit of POV camera work could be done, i may have missed it if they did read it out as i didn't watch all of the shows in their entirety .
Bsx should just scrap the whole txting thing altogether, it just hinders the show, all the time spent messing about reading endless txt requests, the majority of which wouldnt be allowed, just let girls like camilla do what they do best and put on a decent show, say a text is for arguments sake £1 maybe they should ditch them and charge £6 instead for x do away with osg's and just let the girls put on a decent show without the hassle
^^^ Iv'e always sent in the odd text or two going right back to Party People on freeview, so at first i though it was a good idea when they brought it to BSX , but i tend to agree, it's spoiling the shows at times and hindering girls performances at times, it worked well for a free to air non explicit show like Party People as it didn't really effect the girls performances or hinder them.. The BSX live shows were better imo before the text service started .
Camilla gave two explanations last night as to why she couldn't go further than just showing her pussy. 1 Anything more is illegal 2 They didn't both have the correct medical certificates. OK we don't expect to see full on hardcore porn but penetration was shown on the filler pre recorded clips, particularly of Camilla and Ree Petra if I'm not mistaken, although shown from side on, exactly as the shows used to be. Why can't they do the same thing live? For fucks sake, the 2 4 1 shows on freeview used to be far better than this and Charlie C Tiffany and several others used to do some cracking shows. Charlie has done naked photos and web shows so what's her problem now? As for the medical certificate is Camilla suggesting she can't trust Charlie? For the sort of interaction that they can legally show it shouldn't matter. Not going to catch much from some decent nipple play for example.
Someone at Babestation needs to get a grip and tell these performers that they are being well paid to provide a certain service and if they won't,sorry, fuck them off and get some who will. Either that or scrap the show and stop ripping people off.
obviously it is o.k.to perform open leg,close up pussy nights.camilla,dionne and 3 or 4 others clearly demonstrate this.personally i cannot begin to understand any reason for all girls on an x rated pay channel not to at least conform to this standard.i have decided not to tune in on nights that non x girls are involved.i get just as frustrated if they are paired to a full on x girl and invariably reduce the x level feel of the entire evening.so,no red button for me during the next 3 nights.be grateful for feedback from those that do tune in.it helps.for example i learned that lacey has dropped her nun like attitude and gone back to her former full on self.be tuning in nights she not paired to softcore.many thanks in anticipation to those that bother to post back and provide this useful service.
(29-12-2012 21:58 )deltic Wrote: [ -> ]Camilla gave two explanations last night as to why she couldn't go further than just showing her pussy. 1 Anything more is illegal 2 They didn't both have the correct medical certificates. OK we don't expect to see full on hardcore porn but penetration was shown on the filler pre recorded clips, particularly of Camilla and Ree Petra if I'm not mistaken, although shown from side on, exactly as the shows used to be. Why can't they do the same thing live? For fucks sake, the 2 4 1 shows on freeview used to be far better than this and Charlie C Tiffany and several others used to do some cracking shows. Charlie has done naked photos and web shows so what's her problem now? As for the medical certificate is Camilla suggesting she can't trust Charlie? For the sort of interaction that they can legally show it shouldn't matter. Not going to catch much from some decent nipple play for example.
Someone at Babestation needs to get a grip and tell these performers that they are being well paid to provide a certain service and if they won't,sorry, fuck them off and get some who will. Either that or scrap the show and stop ripping people off.
Like I said before camilla has told people politely the reasons girls cant perform certain things on BSX, if people disagree with this, thats fine, but it's not going to change any laws or rules by ranting angrily about the girls, it's not their decision what the rules are and they will stick by them for the sake of their jobs, we all know girls like Charlie, Tiffany, Madison won't go as far as Camilla, so the people saying they are being ripped off are in my opinion mistaken, you know what to expect from each girl before paying for X the likely hood of Tiff & Charlie ect going as far as Camilla are pretty much zero. Yes these girls might have been more incline to put on more daring risky shows in the past but times have changed, rules are a lot tighter and there are a lot more restrictions in place, Nobody is forcing anybody to pay for X.
I've said it many times before, if people don't enjoy BSX there are plenty of other alternatives that provide harder content.
(28-12-2012 20:40 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think we get a refund, the info they sent use by text was wrong/false but they clearly advertised on TV that Camilla was doing the show and never mentioned Jada .
In this case i don't think BS were deliberately trying to con people into spending a fiver to watch Jada when she wasn't on, someone somewhere just made a honest scheduling fuck up imo .
Jada pulled out quite late, according to what Camilla said. Camilla was expecting to be on Babestation not BabestationX, but was asked to switch at the last minute.
(29-12-2012 23:22 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote: [ -> ] (29-12-2012 21:58 )deltic Wrote: [ -> ]Camilla gave two explanations last night as to why she couldn't go further than just showing her pussy. 1 Anything more is illegal 2 They didn't both have the correct medical certificates. OK we don't expect to see full on hardcore porn but penetration was shown on the filler pre recorded clips, particularly of Camilla and Ree Petra if I'm not mistaken, although shown from side on, exactly as the shows used to be. Why can't they do the same thing live? For fucks sake, the 2 4 1 shows on freeview used to be far better than this and Charlie C Tiffany and several others used to do some cracking shows. Charlie has done naked photos and web shows so what's her problem now? As for the medical certificate is Camilla suggesting she can't trust Charlie? For the sort of interaction that they can legally show it shouldn't matter. Not going to catch much from some decent nipple play for example.
Someone at Babestation needs to get a grip and tell these performers that they are being well paid to provide a certain service and if they won't,sorry, fuck them off and get some who will. Either that or scrap the show and stop ripping people off.
Like I said before camilla has told people politely the reasons girls cant perform certain things on BSX, if people disagree with this, thats fine, but it's not going to change any laws or rules by ranting angrily about the girls, it's not their decision what the rules are and they will stick by them for the sake of their jobs, we all know girls like Charlie, Tiffany, Madison won't go as far as Camilla, so the people saying they are being ripped off are in my opinion mistaken, you know what to expect from each girl before paying for X the likely hood of Tiff & Charlie ect going as far as Camilla are pretty much zero. Yes these girls might have been more incline to put on more daring risky shows in the past but times have changed, rules are a lot tighter and there are a lot more restrictions in place, Nobody is forcing anybody to pay for X.
I've said it many times before, if people don't enjoy BSX there are plenty of other alternatives that provide harder content.
I have said before on this thread the biggest issue i have with this channel is the way is promoted as having no rules and now it turns out it has more rules than if Ofcom was its regulator.In regard of medical certificates surely something could be done to sort this problem,these girls are liable to be asked to engage in some form of contact its an adult channel not a bank.