A recent post I made as fallen foul of the moderators. In it I described one of the models as a fat girl. It wasn't very long before I received the Private Message telling me that my post had been censored, not because it said anything that wasn't true and honest, but because other members had complained about me calling the model fat, and that I was being to "blunt". In her reply,the model In question didn't mind at all. But what I wrote was relevant and It hadn't been said in a nasty way and she must have understood that. But as I said other members had taken umbridge at my remark, hence the word "fat" being removed from the post.
Is it not a case of 'What is the point of these channels' more 'what is the point of this forum' if fellow members become censors and decide what should be included and what should not.
Why do some people think that these girls need protecting from any remark that is likely to be made about them just because they are a favourite model of theirs. This particular model, by her own admission is overweight. And she also gets naked on TV for a living. My point is, some members are not far removed from Ofcoms way of thinking on deciding what we should , and what we should not read.
i think as long as it is not portrayed as an insult directly ,all comments are an opinion which should be accepted,
For me, the key thing which really gets to me, is that the government " Ofcom" are not allowing Adults over the age of 18yrs of age are Demorcratic rights to choose what we want to watch
I feel as though Ofcom are trying to police British Society, i get the feeling they want to protect us, and try to keep us from harm
What they are doing is they are taking away are Democratic rights to choose what we can and cannot watch and this is Totally and Utterly Wrong
Look we don't live in a perfect world, they'll always be homosexuals in this world and they'll always be pornography its that simple
the fact that Ofcom thinks a woman's Vagina and Lesbian 241 action is causing harm and offence is the Biggest Pile of Shit I've heard
These Adult channels are under the SKY EPG, and if some irresponsible parent leaves there children the remote control and go's off, only to walk back in the room and see's them watching Adult content, it's not the channels which are at fault, it's the PARENTS
(16-02-2012 21:32 )continental19 Wrote: [ -> ]they'll always be homosexuals in this world
What does that have to do with anything?
(16-02-2012 21:49 )iloveMegan Wrote: [ -> ] (16-02-2012 21:32 )continental19 Wrote: [ -> ]they'll always be homosexuals in this world
What does that have to do with anything?
The reason i mentioned this is because Ofcom deem any girl on girl contact offensive, i don't personally care if people are gay or not, live and let live i say.
(16-02-2012 17:10 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: [ -> ]A recent post I made as fallen foul of the moderators. In it I described one of the models as a fat girl. It wasn't very long before I received the Private Message telling me that my post had been censored, not because it said anything that wasn't true and honest, but because other members had complained about me calling the model fat, and that I was being to "blunt". In her reply,the model In question didn't mind at all. But what I wrote was relevant and It hadn't been said in a nasty way and she must have understood that. But as I said other members had taken umbridge at my remark, hence the word "fat" being removed from the post.
Is it not a case of 'What is the point of these channels' more 'what is the point of this forum' if fellow members become censors and decide what should be included and what should not.
Why do some people think that these girls need protecting from any remark that is likely to be made about them just because they are a favourite model of theirs. This particular model, by her own admission is overweight. And she also gets naked on TV for a living. My point is, some members are not far removed from Ofcoms way of thinking on deciding what we should , and what we should not read.
I agree, but I will say that usually the mods will tell you before they censor your comments anyway. It's a bit lame of other members to complain to the mods about comments, as they should be complaining to the actual person who posted the comments first, and if that member tells them no, then the complaining member should just deal with it. I've never complained about any of the members here, or about any of their comments, and the only time I've ever asked a member to alter their comments is when they've revealed too much about slips in the Elite thread, because we've seen how other channels can use that against them to make complaints. Those members altered their comments, since they didn't really know about the whole complaints from rival channels. Lately, I couldn't be arsed to ask a member to not reveal too much, seeing how you can't be PMing every single person who reveals something. I don't see much point anymore.
Let me make it clear mrmann the complaint was not directly to admin it was made in following posts but the complaints quoted my original post so they had to be censored also. Then admin decided my post would cause more complaints and censored the so-called offending word. So because of some members complaint and over zealous action by the mods I have been deprived of my fair say on this forum. Just like Ofcom deprive us each and every day.
What's the point of anything,cause we are all going to die one day
(16-02-2012 23:10 )SeanTheDon Wrote: [ -> ]What's the point of anything,cause we are all going to die one day
Fuck me, cheer up mate, that's a bit grim
whilst we live then we can still have hope for our real life and also our beloved babe channels, never give up as tommorow could be a better day and allways be positive and optimistic, one day our day of liberation will come
(16-02-2012 21:52 )continental19 Wrote: [ -> ] (16-02-2012 21:49 )iloveMegan Wrote: [ -> ] (16-02-2012 21:32 )continental19 Wrote: [ -> ]they'll always be homosexuals in this world
What does that have to do with anything?
The reason i mentioned this is because Ofcom deem any girl on girl contact offensive, i don't personally care if people are gay or not, live and let live i say.
An odd thing to say, and an odd reason given for saying it. If you're trying to imply that Ofcom is controlled by homosexuals out to frustrate the likes of you, then ask yourself this: why is there such an overwhelming bias towards heterosexual (or lesbian with an eye on the hetero market) material across the Sky adult channels? What is there available for gay viewers at present? A couple of channels of pre-recorded/encrypted stuff among the forest of straight channels doing live, unencrypted request stuff? Not exactly an even balance, is it? Personally I think the idea that they're censorious celibate puritans holds more water as a hunch!