(04-10-2021 16:16 )docutech Wrote: [ -> ]Chloe has been eating a buffet on TV for the past hour....what is this actually achieving for the channel ?...to think I used to enjoy coming home early or booked a half day from the office to spend good money speaking to a fav girl on the channel in the afternoons ......
WELCOME TO S66 CHAT,one if not only the most soft idea ever,but still it goes on.Marvellous.
I was beginning to think we had lost Gemma Jane (second only to Ana Harris) from S66. Good that she is back, but damn bad if that is only to be snared in the web of backstage off cam crap!! Evski Rhiannon (and the very few others that appear) need help on S66 chat (nothing can save it now perhaps). Gemma is perfect for it. She was mesmerizing on her( only I think) appearance.
TV only is where she has a home!! (pleading emoji!!! lol)
(04-10-2021 17:39 )Freeloaderthatsme Wrote: [ -> ]WELCOME TO S66 CHAT,one if not only the most soft idea ever,but still it goes on.Marvellous.
66chat was a solid idea for a new promo tool. A new tool designed for a new era of the shows where callers like docutech are still essential but less central and lined up to accomodate Ofcom's most recent puritanical cleansing of the 900's (like what goes out there is of any real consequence to anyone except us lot and the regulator).
Central to it was the scope for babes (particular the newer ones) to regain a fuller connection and steady engagement with the shows' increasingly fractured audience - fractured in terms of the multipicitious desires punters hold for their interactions. (When you increase the number of paid options guys can use to interact, you increase the range and style of show guys want and expect to see. You also increase the possibilities for disappointment and dissatisfaction as one type of punter can be squeezed out by another or a service compromised by a distracted babe. Presumably 66chat was supposed to hold guys and encourage them when the proper output wasn't entirely to their taste.) The main problem that's emerged from these good intentions: Chat's implementation has been unambitious at almost every turn; its level of engagement has ranged from infantile to the woefully mundane. It's turned into an inane waste of so much time for those on both sides the screen; an embarrassment to the channel and its babes.
It amazes me how little they've encouraged anything beyond an utterly vacuous back and forth on there. (Was there even a moment's discussion of the recent OF debacle for instance?) Having zero self analysis of the shows or space given for proper feedback on them is a particular disappointment. This is an industry that doesn't really want to know what its customers think of it anymore it seems (most connections have long since stopped corresponding in any meaningful way here). Anything but sycophancy from the fans is condemned, deflected, or blocked. 66chat is no exception. But when insiders maintain a stance that their audience is made up of mostly weak minded individuals ripe only for manipulation there can be little grounds for true dialogue on approach and formats perhaps.
Of course, so many limits are placed on 66chat's content and interactions that it renders the chance of effective output remote at best. (Not all these limits come from the regulator.) Either that or too many of the insiders involved don't understand/have lost sight of what was there to be had with it. All told, at this point it does indeed look well and truly kiboshed.
Noticed that they added st66 TV on the guide
^ Yes this has happened a couple of times over the last few days. Bit inconsistent atm but needed I think - if they can put the relevant babes name alongside it even better. Long overdue.
(04-10-2021 16:16 )docutech Wrote: [ -> ]Chloe has been eating a buffet on TV for the past hour....
She didn't just eat that buffet though. She prepared it first. It reminded me of eUrotic TV.
^Just what we need on TV. ANOTHER cooking show.
Maybe they could give it a name...
Can't Wank Won't Wank.
The Great British Wank Off.
MasterBates (Presented by Gregg Wallace for additional Wankerism)
etc.
(06-10-2021 14:24 )BarrieBF Wrote: [ -> ] (04-10-2021 16:16 )docutech Wrote: [ -> ]Chloe has been eating a buffet on TV for the past hour....
She didn't just eat that buffet though. She prepared it first. It reminded me of eUrotic TV.
How do they make money out of this ? or is just raising awareness that the girls are there or can be found on cam etc.
I would understand if there was three channels as previous or are they just not bothered and are just using the time up.
If any girl I have remotely spoken to in the past is on there I will call her and ask about it, as I just don't get it lol ...
(07-10-2021 20:35 )docutech Wrote: [ -> ]How do they make money out of this ? ...
Beats me. She was actually making healthy smoothies at one point. Wtf?
The whole thing feels like one of those cliched 1980s sports movies where the owner of the franchise secretly wants the team to lose for some nefarious reason.
(07-10-2021 21:01 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: [ -> ] (07-10-2021 20:35 )docutech Wrote: [ -> ]How do they make money out of this ? ...
Beats me. She was actually making healthy smoothies at one point. Wtf?
The whole thing feels like one of those cliched 1980s sports movies where the owner of the franchise secretly wants the team to lose for some nefarious reason.
It breaks even,as a previous poster said the six sados on the chat talking bollocks and playing games will fund it.Take them out of the equation and it fails.