The UK Babe Channels Forum

(29-11-2015 21:24 )Krill Liberator Wrote: [ -> ]Okay, this has probably been asked many, many times previously, but I'm going to ask anyway because I frankly can't be arsed to go all the way back through pages and pages of this thread.
What, exactly, is it with this whole mis-spelling of names phenomenon? We presently have the beautiful 'Looiser Fox' on screen.
Really?
Is this a joke? But no, is it a joke? Do S66 encourage 'cute' pranking by the staff responsible for inputting names on the OSG, or do they actually hire illiterates? It might be a joke (like that whole on-screen 'nickname' thing the other week with Teejay 'Dog' Walker - really her nickname? Dog? hmmmmm) or it's just that the staff are a bunch of childish jokers incapable of professionalism, I really am at a loss.
Please, someone tell me what the hell; I'm not a grammar n@zi by a long chalk (anyone reading any of my posts would know that straight off) but this is ridiculous.

Just 'banter'. Plus a slight incentive to get people to call in "hey, you see what they're calling you? how you feel about that?"

(29-11-2015 18:53 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]The daytime shows are better imo because the daytime babes are more effective at doing their job and not necessarily just because they are hotter. I do agree the daytime babes are hotter but for me this is not the be all and end all.
The quality of outfits is better for a start imo.
Also there seems to be more personality and vibrancy amongst the daytime babes. The temptation to call is therefore greater as a result. If it is about generating my call then the daytime babes win. The daytime stuff is meant to be flirty, vicacious and fun with a hint of dare. Although S66 do not always succeed they unquestionably succeed more than on the nightshows imo.
The daytime babes on laptops are most likely responding to texts and tweets in order to interact with the viewers.
This is understandable when not on a call.
No matter how hot the babe unless there is some semblance of imagination about the spectacle they provide then I will not call. In the case of daytime babes this cannot be achieved by tits out, knickers off all out filth.
The daytime babes rely on outfit, flirty body language and on screen demeanour.
In these regards the daytime babes succeed more often where the night babes do not hence my opinion the dayshows are better.

If you swapped the S66 day and night roster around would you still think the dayshows are better? im watching Teejay and Stacey today they are two stunning beauties but their "performance" is no better than Paige Turnah and Victoria Roberts last night, i just don't happen to find them attractive so i wouldn't knock one out over them even if they were naked in the shower

I agree the S66 nightshows are poor but the dayshows aren't better there's just better eye candy on days, also i notice you don't seem to mind bed sets being used during the day

^ List of daytime babes I think are better daytime performers than anyone on nights as performers.
Mikaela Witt (although her naughty hours are better than virtually all S66 nightshows as well) Abbey B, Fernanda Ferrari, Becky Roberts, Paige Phillips, Mikayla Bayliss, Louisa Fox, Sophia Lares (prefer her on days to nights), Anastasia Harris, Cara Brett (prefer her dayshows to naughty hours now), Caitlin Wynters, Macy Leigh, Emma C as well as the two babes you mention.
I think thats enough to be getting on with .
They achieve more of the objectives of daytime stuff I outlined in my previous post better than the nightshow babes do in their role imo.
Would I swap the daytime and nightshow roster around.
No.
Why?
Because the daytime babes don't do nightshows for a reason.
They don't want to. Unless you have the appetite to do something like nightshows then your perfornance quality will in my view be inherently compromised.
However good looking any babe is if their performance level is poor I will switch off, day or night. End of.

To answer your other point.
If Paige or Victoria did a naked solo stint in the shower would I watch? Gawd blimey not half I would .
How about a naked 2-4-1?.
Another phone bill bashing too .

And so to your final point.
The bed set. Ah yes the bed set.
The requirement for daytime entertainment is different as I explained in my previous post.
The demand for regular change of position and pose is not so high. There is not such a need for all out sexual stimulation.
It is about the quality of outfit and outfit play, tease, titilation, fun, vivaciousness of personality and ability to engage and interact with the viewers by virtue of call, text or tweet.
On nights the bed is an instant turn off for me because it kills sexual stimulation unless the babe can make it look as though the bed is almost not there.
On days it is different. I don't recall complaining about bed sets on dayshows much if at all in my time on here. Cue everyone looks through my entire post history to try and prove me wrong .
The movement requirement is the chief reason for this.
Dayshows are more subtle and less in your face but they still need the qualities I outlined in my previous post.
Dayshow babes don't need to thrust themselves this way and that on all fours or standing up.

As I said before it is all about objectives.
Do the S66 dayshows generally achieve their performance objective? In my view yes.
Can the same be said for nightshows on S66? In my view no.

Eye candy is all very fine but it only carries a babe so far.
They can have the best eyes, smile, tits, arse, arms, legs, feet, pussy and abs in the entire universe.
If they do not perform then it is game over.

She is starting next Tuesday

now here is someone id luv on a night show but i know it aint gonna happen

(30-11-2015 20:33 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Can the same be said for nightshows on S66? In my view no.

Eye candy is all very fine but it only carries a babe so far.
They can have the best eyes, smile, tits, arse, arms, legs, feet, pussy and abs in the entire universe.
If they do not perform then it is game over.

True, but a girl can be the best performer in the entire universe but if she is average looking or worse then its game over, there is a girl on the babeshows who i used to like and she is arguably one of the best performers on the babeshows but i no longer find her attractive

The quality of babes on the S66 nightroster isn't good enough even compared to 2 years ago, they could have proper 2-4-1s every night but i won't get turned on apart from the odd pairing

People will always choose looks over performance, Kerrie Lee has probably been one of the best performers on S66 this year, she ain't gonna win the babe of the year award though

dayshows are generally static and dull imo but as i said some babes are good to look at

It's game over anyway now as there is no cold water left in the taps. Apparently its all been used up in the Ramsbottom area .

Danni King ?............Yawn. Another tits-out model, that for years has only done, and will only do, covered up work. Grown women scared of 'dirty talk'.....Laughable. Another example ofd Elite having attractive girls during the day, and rough lasses during nights. Poor.

(30-11-2015 21:14 )darren73 Wrote: [ -> ]She is starting next Tuesday

Alright daytime roster out of control they've gone on an amazing recruiting spree why cant they do the same for nights?

Also a new girl Lauren Elle is listed to start today as well. How are they going to squeeze all these new girls into their daytime schedule? Are we going to see some old faces disappear soon or is a 2nd box going to be added to the screens?

Another girl lying on that bed doing very little happy days!!!!!