The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
games could work seen BSU do similar and it has been a good fun watch, on reason a non adult game could not work, give the girls a simple challenge where the winner gets something like a special outfit,so fun for us to watch and the girl dose some thin at the end so it has a point, could get twitter to come up with the challenge
(24-11-2015 13:22 )Studio66 TV News Wrote: [ -> ]We are thinking about introducing a daily 15 minute segment in which girls will take to the screen to talk directly to fans via questions or challenges on twitter and messages etc….

If we were to do that - What kind of things would you like to see?

Simple question and answer?
Perhaps some sort of game..?
Any other ideas?

Is it something you would want to get involved in?

(Non-Adult only)
Sounds like a good idea.

Whilst someone from S66 is on, got to ask some questions. Whats up with the night shows? Why is it that whenever their on Jennifer Jade and Lucy Zara get their own channel all night? Cant you rotate throughout the night to give others that solo spot for an hour at least? Also Daytime Xtra, i struggle to believe that at a S66 production meeting you all sat around and agreed that we need more hours of daytime. Its terrible and takes away 2 hours of night show at what is surely your busiest part of the night. Could you please clarify the actual rules about 2-4-1 interaction? It seems that sometimes its allowed and the show gets a bit playful and other times 'cut to the logo' man intervenes far too frequently. Tease hours, in general i think there very good, Mikki B, Mikaeala, Lucy Anne all put on good entertaining hours. But can you make sure that all tease hours are done on a set that requires the performer to be vertical so they dont just lay there doing there best statue impersonation. I will end by saying that Mikaela Witt is the best thing to happen to S66 in a very long time and needs to be on way more often, perferably nights.

I know this is the daytime thread and ive rambled on about nights, so i will close by saying that i think S66 daygirls are generally very good looking and seem engaging with their callers, even if they are rinsing them with extortionate webcam prices and the infernal wishlists. One final thought is to get more of daygirls into the night shows, even if the cost is high that is what all your day viewers want and they will call.
(24-11-2015 13:22 )Studio66 TV News Wrote: [ -> ]We are thinking about introducing a daily 15 minute segment in which girls will take to the screen to talk directly to fans via questions or challenges on twitter and messages etc….

If we were to do that - What kind of things would you like to see?

Simple question and answer?
Perhaps some sort of game..?
Any other ideas?

Is it something you would want to get involved in?

(Non-Adult only)


How about a "rinsing game" were you could see which girl can accumulate the highest value of free stuff.
Apparently many would be happy to get involved. Wink
(24-11-2015 13:22 )Studio66 TV News Wrote: [ -> ]We are thinking about introducing a daily 15 minute segment in which girls will take to the screen to talk directly to fans via questions or challenges on twitter and messages etc….

If we were to do that - What kind of things would you like to see?

Simple question and answer?
Perhaps some sort of game..?
Any other ideas?

Is it something you would want to get involved in?

(Non-Adult only)

Great idea, allows people to find out more about their fav s66 babes by sending questions via Twitter etc. Do this on the nightshows too
Much as I slam the S66 nightshow product my opinion of the dayshow stuff is pretty much the polar opposite.
The daytime roster and product is superb imo. I love it.
Strange old world Huh.
The dayshows on S66 aren't better than the nightshows the day babes are just hotter, Louisa Fox and Cara Brett are laying on a bed doing nothing today but i'd rather watch them than most of the S66 night roster, with it now being the indoor season i watch the dayshows more often but they aren't exactly exciting to watch when they spend most of the day playing on laptops

if Elite had this roster of nightgirls back in 2009/2010 how many people would have enjoyed watching Elite, the product can be fantastic but its the quality of babe thats most important
The daytime shows are better imo because the daytime babes are more effective at doing their job and not necessarily just because they are hotter. I do agree the daytime babes are hotter but for me this is not the be all and end all.
The quality of outfits is better for a start imo.
Also there seems to be more personality and vibrancy amongst the daytime babes. The temptation to call is therefore greater as a result. If it is about generating my call then the daytime babes win. The daytime stuff is meant to be flirty, vicacious and fun with a hint of dare. Although S66 do not always succeed they unquestionably succeed more than on the nightshows imo.
The daytime babes on laptops are most likely responding to texts and tweets in order to interact with the viewers.
This is understandable when not on a call.
No matter how hot the babe unless there is some semblance of imagination about the spectacle they provide then I will not call. In the case of daytime babes this cannot be achieved by tits out, knickers off all out filth.
The daytime babes rely on outfit, flirty body language and on screen demeanour.
In these regards the daytime babes succeed more often where the night babes do not hence my opinion the dayshows are better.
(29-11-2015 18:19 )Joey 27 Wrote: [ -> ]The dayshows on S66 aren't better than the nightshows the day babes are just hotter, Louisa Fox and Cara Brett are laying on a bed doing nothing today but i'd rather watch them than most of the S66 night roster, with it now being the indoor season i watch the dayshows more often but they aren't exactly exciting to watch when they spend most of the day playing on laptops

if Elite had this roster of nightgirls back in 2009/2010 how many people would have enjoyed watching Elite, the product can be fantastic but its the quality of babe thats most important

^ They are not meant to be "exciting" on the same terms though. The day product does what it sets out to do in spades. The night product fails miserably. (And yes, lazy and complacent personnel both in front and behind the camera must take the greatest blame for this surely. Yes, they have been dealt a rough hand in terms of legislation but, as all problems, it's how you deal with them you'll be judged by.)

Also, the "quality" of the babe is not just her attractiveness. It's also her demeanour and what she gets up to (on nights that is). Or rather what she is allowed, encouraged or facilitated in getting up to. The same set of girls in a 2009/2010 environment would be unrecognisable from as they are today I think.

Most would have done okay back then, IMO, given what would have been expected of them. A few would have been found out and ditched very quickly. Since then, the channels have reaped what they have sown; the girls merely adapting to what's expected of them (i.e. very little atm).
Cara Cara day [Image: animated-jumping-smiley-image-0034.gif]
Okay, this has probably been asked many, many times previously, but I'm going to ask anyway because I frankly can't be arsed to go all the way back through pages and pages of this thread.
What, exactly, is it with this whole mis-spelling of names phenomenon? We presently have the beautiful 'Looiser Fox' on screen.
Really? bladewave
Is this a joke? But no, is it a joke? Do S66 encourage 'cute' pranking by the staff responsible for inputting names on the OSG, or do they actually hire illiterates? It might be a joke (like that whole on-screen 'nickname' thing the other week with Teejay 'Dog' Walker - really her nickname? Dog? hmmmmm) or it's just that the staff are a bunch of childish jokers incapable of professionalism, I really am at a loss.Huh
Please, someone tell me what the hell; I'm not a grammar n@zi by a long chalk (anyone reading any of my posts would know that straight off) but this is ridiculous.
Reference URL's