The UK Babe Channels Forum

(23-01-2018 19:32 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]If S66's (and BS') new tactic is for us to pay £5 a minute to watch a host via a shitty webcam and awful lighting on top of paying £2 per minute plus a connection fee to call them with loads of background noise, they can shove it.

Where exactly would you like to shove it exactly?

(22-01-2018 21:19 )Chrisst Wrote: [ -> ]

(22-01-2018 08:28 )babelover48 Wrote: [ -> ]

(21-01-2018 17:02 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ]

(21-01-2018 13:48 )southlondonphil Wrote: [ -> ]I'm sure you weren't having an exchange with James McCann. The gallerys66 persona is nothing like Jamie.

By all accounts, Jamie isn't even around the studio very much these days. It would be hard to believe he was operating the chatbox.

So if Jamie isn't around at the studio much where is he? have to say
I haven't seen much on his twitter lately

I think it is him. We've all heard Fernanda wail ''JAMESsss'' when her phone dies or something. When signing off on Saturday 13th she apologised for us not hearing her Merry Christmas sign off. Fernanda had been told about the failing by fans and said that she'd just told 'James' off about it.
I'm prepared to bet that his family probably think that he lives at the bloody place. I'll bet that he came in last Saturday for a few hours because nobody else would. He had to go and so set the controls for the heart of the sun and left things in the hands of a technician until the night staff started at 10.00.

Hi mate, he is James and no Jamie, one of the useless S66 dayshow producers.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid2123353


He must be working today because the management of the f*****g box with the girls cannot be worse



Well,, another exciting day in S66 (irony on)

(22-01-2018 23:00 )babelover48 Wrote: [ -> ]What's BGF?

(23-01-2018 20:05 )quiquems Wrote: [ -> ]Well,, another exciting day in S66 (irony on)

Ok everybody to avoid complications in the future we'll call all useless producers Osif Dut.
BTW:

(23-01-2018 19:52 )babelover48 Wrote: [ -> ]

(23-01-2018 19:32 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]If S66's (and BS') new tactic is for us to pay £5 a minute to watch a host via a shitty webcam and awful lighting on top of paying £2 per minute plus a connection fee to call them with loads of background noise, they can shove it.

Where exactly would you like to shove it exactly?

I'm only willing to discuss that privately with Fernanda Ferrari LOL

(22-01-2018 23:25 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]I have some comments/questions on your list:
1. Are you just surmising these times and changes based on when the Gallery guy was communicative mate? Or is there something else behind what you've outlined here? Are we even sure that Gallery is a prod? Might it not be 'logo man' who's (more often?) 'Gallery'? (It's been implied on the forum in the past that these are different roles I believe.)

2. Good to get the basic info on this, but as often with simple answers they just beg more questions (not doubting Gallery's word in any way, shape, or form on it either btw): For instance: Did TVX ask for more and 66 not want to pay it? Did 66 simply drop it to concentrate on the web? Both could be looked at as giving 903 up. Why wasn't it worth continuing with? is the other obvious quandary. (Although if we grant that 66 are making their other TV channels cost effective it seems that likely docutech may well have been correct and its rent was judged too expensive.) I appreciate these sorts of specifics are not going to be as easily revealed, I just thought I'd lay out the obvious options.

3. For me, anything except "All buy Sky?" (I wouldn't advise that, overated and overly expensive ) and the last option. Fern gives good mic for sure but jeez, cutting your nose off to spite your face that one. No reason the mic can't work on that angle too. It's not the angle's fault either is it!

4. The babes do put up with not being heard on mic... a LOT. I suppose they've tried to do something about it?

1. Yes definitely.
2. That's what they said about going to the moon. Least worst option
3. It only really matters to me in the event of a babe making a very important announcement. It'll be covered on all the primary sources but I surmise announced live first.
4. You made a very interesting remark somewhere about the quality of day versus night show production. Presumably money talks.

(22-01-2018 19:47 )quiquems Wrote: [ -> ]As I said in my previous post the problem isnt the box, the biggest problem is the shit that they are producing, statics girls in the same set with the same outfits and playing with their mobile phones for 8 hours is what they are offering. It seems that they don't want people to call, they are interested in the perve scam

You can do the same cap at 11:00 or 22:00 when they ends their shifts

And this crap day after day, but well it doesnt surprise me when on a channel the bosses are the girls.

Anyway i guess they will continue ripping off fanboys with the perve scams without sound, awful quality, continuously freezing and where you cannot see the face of the girl to 3 £/min

Well said

(21-01-2018 14:28 )Chrisst Wrote: [ -> ]1. There was at least 2 producers yesterday:
Producer 1 until approx 14.00 who didn't communicate on Firestorm
and muddled up option numbers.
Producer 2 from 14.00 who wrote on Firestorm and even
remembered to put on the logo screen once when Fernanda had a
slip.
Producer 1 again or 3 from about 19.00 who switched to alternate
view, as requested by many, allowed an empty shot for 20 minutes
whilst she took a break, didn't communicate and didn't respect
Fernanda's wish to bid farewell to her fans.

Just a few comments on the above.

Your timing looks right for the change from the morning producer to the daytime producer. I think 14:00 is when that happens.

I doubt if the daytime producer put the logo up as you stated, as that is more likely down to the studio manager.

The morning producer wouldn't have returned at 19:00 and neither would there be a new producer at that time. I suggest that the daytime producer most likely took a break about then and the runner took the reigns.

The night producer doesn't take over until 22:00 or thereabouts.

^ IIRC last year's article from the former xpanded producer said that the night producer's start time was 8pm there. Whether that includes control over broadcast output from that time or was for the night's preparatory meetings (something we have been told BS do every evening) and so forth, was not something she went into.

Would this be industry standard perhaps?

Are you going with generally accepted three producers a day admiral? Morning, afternoon and nighttime? Again, would you say that was standard across the operators?

Also, are you saying that you think studio manager is the official term for logo man? Or more accurately the studio manager job includes all logo duties?

A few more positives to go along with the negatives might be helpful.

(23-01-2018 20:17 )Chrisst Wrote: [ -> ]...
BTW:
...

No-one's doubting McCann as one of the top dogs at 66 Chrisst - he has been since they started. What posters are suggesting is that someone of his standing might not be needed as producer very often. Another James is very much on the cards.

Studio 66 production positives (other than the presenters and not in comparison to any other station)
1. It's sensual and sometimes sexy.
2. They publish a schedule a week ahead.
3. It's on Freeview.
4. The set is sort of TV shaped
5. The camera is positioned close to the presenter.
6. They keep on trying new things.
7. They have a chat room under the screen and the gallery take part.
8. On the web there's no OSG.
9. They have a magazine and social media.
!0. To make things easy all the producers are called James.