(20-01-2018 22:55 )Chrisst Wrote: [ -> ][snip]
Well, I guess they think the stupid box is the main problem with the S66 shows, it's a waste of time.
And sorry, I think that galleys66 isn't Jamie
, Jamie used to accept tips and acknowledge the help of the people. gallery66 just ignores the advice of people in the chat and constantly he makes false promises.
The concept of privately watching a daytime host perform to the levels of a night time host is good, but the execution by S66 (and BS) has been awful in every single aspect.
I'd happily pay up to £10 to watch a half an hour one-on-one topless or nude show with most of S66's daytime hosts.
As long as the production values (e.g. sound, picture and lighting) are top quality and I have the option of downloading it after too, for a fiver.
S66 could earn up to £420 over 28 days from me if they did that but it'll remain at £0 until they improve their content.
I hope the owners of all the channels read the "Spending Online" thread for more ideas that are probably better than the one I just wrote.
(20-01-2018 23:52 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]I hope the owners of all the channels read the "Spending Online" thread for more ideas that are probably better than the one I just wrote.
With due respect to guys that have posted there, I very much doubt there's anything in that thread that people that do this for a living wouldn't have thought of already. 'Doing' most likely includes a hundred and one concerns, practicalities and difficulties we are little aware of. The thread is a useful resceptical for guys views but I wouldnt say more than that.
(20-01-2018 23:31 )quiquems Wrote: [ -> ]...
And sorry, I think that galleys66 isn't Jamie , Jamie used to accept tips and acknowledge the help of the people. gallery66 just ignores the advice of people in the chat and constantly he makes false promises.
Surely 'gallerys66' is anyone that is in that day that wants to respond. It could be Jamie just as much as it could be anyone else. You can't judge by what that account has said in the past because it's highly likely that, on the times you refer to, it was someone else responding.
(21-01-2018 00:54 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ] (20-01-2018 23:52 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]I hope the owners of all the channels read the "Spending Online" thread for more ideas that are probably better than the one I just wrote.
With due respect to guys that have posted there, I very much doubt there's anything in that thread that people that do this for a living wouldn't have thought of already. 'Doing' most likely includes a hundred and one concerns, practicalities and difficulties we are little aware of. The thread is a useful resceptical for guys views but I wouldnt say more than that.
Cheers ShandyHand, your views and opinions are one the best things about this forum.
^
... But I still can't spell "receptacle".
(Always read back your posts folks!
)
Got to add: You're much too lavish with your praise anyhow.
All I Can say is anything S66 try to do to "improve things" only makes it 10 times worse than they started!
I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt for now, but I am getting concerned about the direction things are going in.
Box right across Macy's tits....FFS
can someone go on chat and tell them to move it to bottom right corner? or remove it altogether
ffs they are not BS lol
(21-01-2018 10:04 )Rake Wrote: [ -> ]Box right across Macy's tits....FFS
you tit wanking her mate? lol