The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Fernanda is the next online only daytime show, taking place tomorrow.
(22-03-2019 17:58 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ]Fernanda is the next online only daytime show, taking place tomorrow.

[Image: image-0755_5C95BC69.jpg]
Pity that the S66 stream is a piece of shit.
This is a job for International Rescue!!!!

(Well ShandyHand anyway!)

So we've had a big development and I'd like to ask a few questions/make a few remarks. Sorry, I didn't see Evelyn's show.

1. Terminology.
Although it was billed, even by the broadcaster as 'Webcam' or 'Backstage' in fact it turned out (from my perspective) just the same as normal. I watched on S66's website as usual, I didn't have to log on, use a password, sign up, join up, pay a subscription, confirm my age (yet) or anything and the picture was just the same. The only difference was that (I presume) Fernanda was not seen by Sky viewers meaning that that her performance need not be regulated by Ofcom and she could be freer. She was obviously pleased by that and remarked on the mic: ''No Ofcom. Fuck them''.
I did wonder whether anyone might have not tuned in because they might have thought that the show would have required a subscription or something and would suggest that the broadcaster will need to invent a branding to differentiate between a web show that can alternatively be watched on Sky from a show that can't. They use the terminology 'Studio Cam' in their guide and then there's 'Cam' meaning 'PerveCam' too.
All told it's a mess. Fortunately our Admin made the sensible decision to not create a separate category for our discussions. They should put him in charge!

2. Reception.
In the Firestorm chatroom several viewers moaned about reception,although one was chancing his arm with a mobile. I had previously ensured mine by using wifi rather than regular internet, using Google Chrome and ensuring all updates are done so my picture remained perfect despite being in the countryside. However I did find it logged on slowly, A pulsing bar proclaimed 'Connected' without a picture.
When Fernanda went on a break a notice advised instead that she was backstage and if they closed down her stream they took ages getting it going again.
Fernsboy reported that the TV/phone delay was as long as three minutes whereas I'd encountered ten seconds or so when speaking to Fernanda before. In the chatroom he reported that Fernanda had told him this had to do with Ofcom so perhaps they still have some role.
There was no music, It seemed that the sound channel was left on Fernanda's microphone so that might avoid occasions where we've missed her announcements.
I noticed that she was billed to start at 11.00. After half an hour GalleryS66 posted that Fernanda would appear in a few minutes but she didn't until 11.45 shortly after Fernsboy asked about her stream in the chatroom. Accordingly we presumably missed what would have been an especially interesting introduction.
I'd be interested to learn what Sky viewers did see, presumably not an advert to see Fernanda on the website.

3. Censorship.
All told Fernanda's show remained very tame, It wasn't even topless. Compare this to everything else on the internet or that Naked Attraction thing or the horrors on any news program. Fernanda said on the mic that she wanted it like that and I certainly agree, it could be any girls pussy. I wondered whether there remains any censorship that the broadcaster has to observe with a non TV show? Presumably there remains the need to differentiate from the material shown behind a paywall such as Studio Cam, Pervecam or on Fernanda's website.

4. Future shows.
Studio 66's producers like it:

[Image: image-61BB_5C9671FD.jpg]

Why haven't they done this before?
Whose idea was it?
Has Fernanda been paid more?
Would I be right in thinking that Studio 66 earn money by selling their feed to Sky (And possibly other TV broadcasters)?
Would I be right in thinking that not selling Sky Fernanda today cost them money?
Might they have further lost by having to pay another presenter to ensure that three channels were made available?
Did they have to negotiate with Sky?'Sorry guys we're not giving you our star turn'.
Would they have lost because of the engineering required? Fernanda mentioned the name Jermaine. Would he have had to operate more equipment to ensure that the other streams went to Sky but that Fernanda's didn't?
Was that conducive to the especially late start?
How will Fernanda feel on Wednesday? Suppose they tell her that they want/have to sell her stream to Sky and that she'll have to behave herself; censorship and all?
Who'll do a non TV show next...Sophia Lares is on later this week?
Could all of Studio 66's daytime shows be like this? As of Monday morning? Would we want that? Have they let the genie out of the bottle?
How will this effect the night time shows. Already not S66's strong suit, Will they need to be stronger? Will that require them to recruit presenters who are more happy to get 'em out?
How will BS react?
What will Ofcom be thinking?

All very interesting, what do you guys think?
(23-03-2019 19:01 )Chrisst Wrote: [ -> ]Q: Why haven't they done this before?
A: I don't know, but I'm glad they have finally done a FTA web-only show.

Q: Whose idea was it?
A: I don't know, maybe it was Fernanda's idea but whoever it was deserves a pay rise

Q: Has Fernanda been paid more?
A: I don't know how the payment structures work at the channels, it's possibly based on number of calls received

Q: Would I be right in thinking that Studio 66 earn money by selling their feed to Sky (And possibly other TV broadcasters)?
A: I don't know, I think the channels have to pay to be on Sky and Freeview. And then they generate profits from calls and pervcam

Q: Would I be right in thinking that not selling Sky Fernanda today cost them money?
A: I don't think the channels "sell" a particular presenter to Sky or Freeview

Q: Might they have further lost by having to pay another presenter to ensure that three channels were made available?
A: I don't think so, and it possibly allows them to earn more because they can have more presenters on web shows than they have available channels on Sky and Freeview

Q: Did they have to negotiate with Sky? 'Sorry guys we're not giving you our star turn'.
A: I doubt they have to have any discussions with Sky about doing web-only shows or which presenters are on TV

Q: Would they have lost because of the engineering required? Fernanda mentioned the name Jermaine.
A: I doubt it, because even if she wasn't doing a web only show Jermaine would still have to engineer her TV show

Q: Would he have had to operate more equipment to ensure that the other streams went to Sky but that Fernanda's didn't?
A: I doubt it, because it could probably done with just a press of a button

Q: Was that conducive to the especially late start?
A: I doubt it, because the set up for doing a web-only show shouldn't be that hard and they've probably been planning this for a while. Fernanda was probably just running late due to traffic

Q: How will Fernanda feel on Wednesday?
A: I don't know, but she's always smiling during her shows, so expect her to be just as bubbly on Wednesday

Q: Suppose they tell her that they want/have to sell her stream to Sky and that she'll have to behave herself; censorship and all?
A: I doubt it'd be an issue, she's used to working to OFCOM rules on TV

Q: Who'll do a non TV show next...Sophia Lares is on later this week?
A: I would love to see Sophia do a web-only show later this week. Rebecca Kelly, Macy Leigh and Heather Kay would be ideal to do a FTA web-only daytime show too, based on their tease shows

Q: Could all of Studio 66's daytime shows be like this?
A: Hopefully this will become the norm, but I doubt it

Q: As of Monday morning?
A: I doubt it, many presenters don't even like going topless behind a paywall. And I'm sure they'd be promoting it on the forum too, before Monday to drum up some publicity

Q: Would we want that?
A: I would love it, if all the channels would do 24 hours worth of FTA web-only shows everyday

Q: Have they let the genie out of the bottle?
A: Hopefully, and I wish the genie will never go back into it's bottle

Q: How will this effect the night time shows. Already not S66's strong suit, Will they need to be stronger?
A: I can't see it affecting S66's night shows, they've always been subpar in comparison to BS' roster, POV, oil & shower shows

Q: Will that require them to recruit presenters who are more happy to get 'em out?
A: I really hope so, but I doubt it

Q: How will BS react?
A: Hopefully they'll follow suit

Q: What will Ofcom be thinking?
A: Fuck OFCOM
I wonder if they are setting up the channel for the post-porn id landscape. If they have website-only shows, and to get access to the website takes an over-18 id, then they don't need to censor them. Trialing them now shows what the interest in them is.
Well Evelyn on web only show again, didn't show fuck all and did pretty much what she always does last time so they put her on again ??? Have the brains at Babestation taken over at s66 cos that's the sort of dumb thing they'd do !
So the Evelyn fan boys are out in full force in chat this is just a day show with perve cam being the main focus all i would like is her to show her ass and different positions to main screen and not cater to that piece of shorts perve cam that's more restrictive that anything
still getting the buffering issues gut instinct tells me that the way they set up for a web only day show like they have done with Fernanada Saturday & Evelyn plays havoc with the other streams
(25-03-2019 12:54 )ceasman Wrote: [ -> ]Well Evelyn on web only show again, didn't show fuck all and did pretty much what she always does last time so they put her on again ??? Have the brains at Babestation taken over at s66 cos that's the sort of dumb thing they'd do !

Very stupid comment.

Why don't you try and find out the whole reason behind the web only show and the people who actually came up with the idea - you mentioned one of their names at the start of the post
Reference URL's