The UK Babe Channels Forum

(01-10-2014 12:37 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]Workspace Group PLC own the stadium were both STD 66 and XF play, so maybe they should be thought of as Sheffield Wednesday ? http://companycheck.co.uk/company/020416...-GROUP-PLC

No, you're making a basic error with that suggestion. Sheffield Wednesday were not liable for what happened in their stadium because they OWNED the stadium, but because they were the occupier of the stadium.

The Occupiers Liability Act of 1957 makes it clear that ownership of a stadium is irrelevant and it's the OCCUPIER of the stadium who has legal responsibility for it, as the occupier is the party which is deemed to be managing the stadium.

This principle is also enshrined in the Safety of Sports Grounds Act 1975, which states that the occupier of the stadium is responsible for the safety of it, and not the owner of the stadium and not the party staging the event.

(01-10-2014 13:24 )tony confederate Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-10-2014 12:37 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]Workspace Group PLC own the stadium were both STD 66 and XF play, so maybe they should be thought of as Sheffield Wednesday ? http://companycheck.co.uk/company/020416...-GROUP-PLC

No, you're making a basic error with that suggestion. Sheffield Wednesday were not liable for what happened in their stadium because they OWNED the stadium, but because they were the occupier of the stadium.

The Occupiers Liability Act of 1957 makes it clear that ownership of a stadium is irrelevant and it's the OCCUPIER of the stadium who has legal responsibility for it, as the occupier is the party which is deemed to be managing the stadium.

This principle is also enshrined in the Safety of Sports Grounds Act 1975, which states that the occupier of the stadium is responsible for the safety of it, and not the owner of the stadium and not the party staging the event.

So are you saying that Workspace group the owner of the STD 66/ XF Stadium/studios is not responsible for the safety of it ? .

(01-10-2014 13:39 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]So are you saying that Workspace group the owner of the STD 66/ XF Stadium/studios is not responsible for the safety of it ? .

Correct. Although I believe the existing studios are in a multi-occupied building. In the case of a multi-occupied building the owner may have a responsibility in respect of any common/communal parts of the building. I say 'may' because it depends on the terms of the lease.

^ Thanks for the info mate, it's something i didn't know .
So thinking about it, the football analogy concerning the STD 66 and XF relationship (studio wise) does seem to work.

But like i posted in a previous post, ( a football club and Rugby club was the analogy being used then) imo the football stadium analogy isn't appropriate for determining the relationship between XF and STD 66 concerning overall content control, licencing etc, (broadcast control was the thing being discussed at that time) it's totally different .
For instance, Sheffield Wednesday the stadium occupier would no be found guilty by the FA for any misdemeanour's committed on the Sheffield Wednesday pitch by an opposing team/player, or for what other teams may do if the ground is used for cup games (concerning on the pitch football matters) .Sheffield Wednesday do not have overall control of what players do on the pitch from other teams, they would not be found guilty by the FA for the on field conduct of a player belonging to another team, whereas STD 66 do have overall control of what is broadcast by XF, STD 66 are the ones that Ofcom/The FA would find guilty if any offences are committed by XF girls, so that was the original point i was making .

{edit} the only way the football club analogy would fit, is if XF was a separately independently licensed babe channel broadcaster using the STD 66 studio, they are not .
A football club using the ground occupied/owned by another is a separately independent licensed club, both clubs are answerable independently to the powers that be concerning football matters on the pitch etc, this is different to the relation ship between XF and STD 66, STD 66 is answerable to the powers that be broadcasting content wise for the actions of the on screen of the XF girls .

What happened to the webshow only shows?
I thought they were supposed to start the beginning of October or was i misinformed?

No Crystal Pink tonight, so Jess West will be flying solo.

(01-10-2014 20:11 )Block Wrote: [ -> ]was i misinformed?

You weren't misinformed because that was what Krystal said, but still the launch of the webshow hasn't happened. I assume it's still going to happen eventually, and is merely delayed, so we will have to wait for news of the revised date.

think it's early next week the webshows start

(02-10-2014 00:06 )bigglesworth Wrote: [ -> ]No Crystal Pink tonight

Sophie Hart on BS currently has a girl caller called Crystal.

WEDNESDAY NIGHT 1st OCTOBER 2014.

Was out 'til late so missed start of show, switched webstream on @ about 0230, showing Studio66 logo...
...checked SKY942 & I thought WTF, Kandi Kay onscreen, but then realised she was multicasting...
....shortly after Jess West appeared onscreen, solo show it seems, as Crystal Pink unable to appear.