The UK Babe Channels Forum

(10-09-2014 00:09 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]I wasn't expecting it to be any different to the other babechannels and was never going to buck the trend. for me it was a new show which would mainly have pornstars on it which you can have phone sex with which for me explains the name xtreme filth

Doesn't explain it at all to me, Rammy. Are pornstars guaranteed to be any more xtreme at phone sex than non-pornstars who can get just as filthy or more?

Seeing as you chose to set such stock on a channel's name, in your jabs at Babestation Starlets, in turn can they really justify the name 'Xtreme Filth'?

(10-09-2014 17:17 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: [ -> ]Is it any wonder that ofcom treat these so-called programmes the way they do. This latest pile of dog shit being served up is a very good reason why they must feel they have a duty to protect the more gullible members of our society. The cretins who are responsible for said dog shit are only interested in one thing, and that is taking everything they can get from the callers, and in return, 'below par everything'. How quickly trash as become acceptable on these channels, but sadly it has. It is just beyond me how anyone can think XtremeFilth is anything other than how i have described it.

having watched the second nights offerings, and the apparent set "changes" I think the phrase "YOU CAN'T POLISH A TURD" springs to mind!

(10-09-2014 17:17 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: [ -> ]Is it any wonder that ofcom treat these so-called programmes the way they do. This latest pile of dog shit being served up is a very good reason why they must feel they have a duty to protect the more gullible members of our society. The cretins who are responsible for said dog shit are only interested in one thing, and that is taking everything they can get from the callers, and in return, 'below par everything'. How quickly trash as become acceptable on these channels, but sadly it has. It is just beyond me how anyone can think XtremeFilth is anything other than how i have described it.

Great post, RA! I fear we are now seeing the 'norm' as far as these channels go, and it's all down to the wankers who are happy to settle for such crap and still hand over their hard-earned by calling in.

No one, and I include the vast majority of viewers / callers, are remotely interested in calling into question Ofcom's treatment of the television adult industry, and while that's the case, nothing will improve.

There is nothing, zippo, nix, zilch... of interest on these channels, to anyone who is looking for adult material.

(10-09-2014 13:02 )lauderdale Wrote: [ -> ]If they are having Jess West on they will thrash Xpanded into oblivion, in my humble opinion, regardless of what sets Xpanded are using.

You might be right, I know Jess is popular.
But wouldn't it look even better if they made an effort with some kind of set? Here they clearly haven't, they've simply cleared out the junk corner and shoved a camera in front
I believe it makes a difference to the viewing as a whole, it gives the girls inspiration to be sexy.
Some may say this is a petty and pointless argument, but I believe some of the best shows we've seen have come by way of a cracking set - the RLC shower set for example.
So whilst the show will only ever be as great as the babe, the setting does matter. It's no different to moaning about all the shitty bed sets that have dampened many a great potential night show down to a steamy pile of static shit.

(10-09-2014 13:57 )Roger Patterson Wrote: [ -> ]Brooke is supposed to be on tonight

They are currently advertising Lissa Love and Bonnie Rose for tonight.

I don't have an opinion on this channel one way or another as I haven't watched it, but I have noticed that Rammy's posts seem to have dried up a bit since this thread was moved from the STD66 forum

(10-09-2014 10:33 )frenchchloe Wrote: [ -> ]Some guys like to see me on the webshow , some on tv , i ll be doing both

Both is good as far as I'm concerned, because I would really like to see you on both.

(10-09-2014 18:48 )Bandwagon Wrote: [ -> ]But wouldn't it look even better if they made an effort with some kind of set?

As Chloe said, the set is not important as long as the lighting is good.

In my opinion this channel has nailed the final nail into the babechannels coffin. All the channels are now offering insipid shite. I thought maybe this channel would be slightly different. I was naive and now realise that non of the channels are even slightly considered adult!

^^^ They are now only of any interest to the fanboys.