(24-09-2014 10:23 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ]Why anyone would think there's a connection is beyond me too 
This is what's known as a "straw man" argument. Behaviour which is characteristic of people such as yourself.
Not one single person in this forum has ever said there was no connection between XtremeFilth and Studio 66. Of course you know this perfectly well already and don't need to me to tell you. You're guilty of knowingly and deliberately misrepresenting the proposition in question.
Note: for anyone who doesn't know, a "straw man" argument creates the illusion of having argued against a proposition, by replacing it with a different proposition ("stand up a straw man") and then refuting that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.
Yes, that's correct, the show is clearly an independent production.
What's your point?
my point is it impossible for the show the be independently produced if there is a connection between XtremeFilth and 66
(24-09-2014 10:23 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ] (24-09-2014 08:37 )Money_Shot Wrote: [ -> ]You insist you're being lied to, but can't come up with a single shred of evidence that would convince anyone outside of your own conspiracy group.
You mean aside from them using the same background music, familiar faces from S66 and the frequent appearance of the S66 logo?
As well as the same background music, familiar faces, frequent appearances of the STD 66 logo, XtremeFilth broadcasts on the same channel as STD 66 days, broadcasts from the same studio, uses the same sets, uses the same broadcast to tv equipment, uses the same STD 66 Ofcom licence.
Content of XtremeFilth is under the control of STD 66.
The girls appearing on XtremeFilth are shown on the STD 66 website schedule as part of their night time line up as well.
I can't understand why some people should think XtremeFilth is just a cheap call rate STD 66 channel myself.
.
Also i notice other forums don't have a separate section for XtremeFilth, other forums have it as part of the STD 66 channel line up .
.
(24-09-2014 13:37 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]my point is it impossible for the show the be independently produced if there is a connection between XtremeFilth and 66
It may be impossible in your mind.
To quote Napoleon: "Impossible is a word you find in the vocabulary of fools."
(24-09-2014 14:08 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ] (24-09-2014 13:37 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]my point is it impossible for the show the be independently produced if there is a connection between XtremeFilth and 66
It may be impossible in your mind.
To quote Napoleon: "Impossible is a word you find in the vocabulary of fools."
just what i have come to expect from you, a personal attack as you have no way to back up your views,
i would just love for you to explain how they can be connected abd independent at the same time,
i refer you back to post 317 where i went into why this channel could not be independent, i would love for you to explain why you feel this is incorrect, hopefully with out personal insults as they are the last refuge of the intellectual coward
(24-09-2014 14:21 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]i refer you back to post 317
I refer you back to post 318, which was in reply to post 317.
(24-09-2014 08:37 )Money_Shot Wrote: [ -> ]So far you haven't even supplied a motive
Good question Money_Shot.
I believe it's because the last venture (S66 USA) was an obvious failure, otherwise it would still be around.
S66 USA disappears..... and up pops XtremeFilth
But this time without the recent 'S66 - badge of failure'
(24-09-2014 14:51 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]I refer you back to post 318, which was in reply to post 317.
your post 317 gave no answer at all you just stated your opinion with out backing it up in anyway,
it is a fact that 66 have full control of content at XF and until till XF can say they control there own content they can't claim to be independently producing the show ,
now should you know any facts that prove this statement to be untrue please post them
