^It might cause some of us to give up, but i'm not gonna allow a bunch of inbred, posh, Etonian twats to tell me what I can and can't do.
Fuck you Cameron, you walking testicle.
(29-07-2015 09:42 )gunnar Wrote: [ -> ]^It might cause some of us to give up, but i'm not gonna allow a bunch of inbred, posh, Etonian twats to tell me what I can and can't do.
Fuck you Cameron, you walking testicle.
I think you will find he is a chauffeur driven testicle
(28-07-2015 23:09 )Tractor boy Wrote: [ -> ]Cameron hates porn, which is ironic as he is great Britain's biggest wanker, so he wants to make the porn viewing process so complicated and intrusive that we will just give and take up gardening instead.
I think you're being very naive there, trying to put this down to one person. I mean if Cameron resigned as prime minister today, do you believe it would make any difference? Is yes it would make a difference what you actually believe?
Labour have said that the proposed law doesn't go far enough. Labour culture spokesman Chris Bryant is quoted as saying "After 5 years of inaction by the Tories, this proposal is too little too late. Labour would have acted by now".
(29-07-2015 10:32 )space watson Wrote: [ -> ] (28-07-2015 23:09 )Tractor boy Wrote: [ -> ]Cameron hates porn, which is ironic as he is great Britain's biggest wanker, so he wants to make the porn viewing process so complicated and intrusive that we will just give and take up gardening instead.
I think you're being very naive there, trying to put this down to one person. I mean if Cameron resigned as prime minister today, do you believe it would make any difference? Is yes it would make a difference what you actually believe?
Labour have said that the proposed law doesn't go far enough. Labour culture spokesman Chris Bryant is quoted as saying "After 5 years of inaction by the Tories, this proposal is too little too late. Labour would have acted by now".
No I don't think things would change, but as he is the PM he is the one pushing the law through.
(29-07-2015 10:32 )space watson Wrote: [ -> ]Labour have said that the proposed law doesn't go far enough. Labour culture spokesman Chris Bryant is quoted as saying "After 5 years of inaction by the Tories, this proposal is too little too late. Labour would have acted by now".
They did say that but they didn't write anything in their manifesto about it though.
Lib Dems oppose it though
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2015...ction-2015
This is a good solution
http://www.xbiz.com/news/197404
Quote:Emm suggested it would be better if ISPs, rather than credit card companies, were to verify the age of users every time they went online.
He said that U.K. ISPs already have your bank details, so there’s no increased risk, and they could act as a gatekeeper to online porn content.
“On first access to the Internet, I’m required to enter a password that I set up when I first established an account,” Emms told Expert Reviews.
He said children would have separate accounts, which would automatically bar access to adult content, using existing filtering systems.
The ISPs could simply just hijack HTTP requests and redirect to age verification in a similar way they do WIFI login for public WIFI.
^^ I don't understand how that would work in practice. I have broadband, so my connection stays up as long as the line is stable, I last connected over two weeks ago. I don't make a new connection every time I sit down to use the internet, this isn't the old days of modems and pay-per-minute phone line connections.