The UK Babe Channels Forum

would love to see more interaction tonight.2 girls 1 phone would be great at some point.

Would anyone care to remind me when this channel is due to stop being Club Paradiso and start as Storm - they've had their graphics up for months now?

It hasnt said club paradiso for ages ?

(24-07-2011 15:35 )Louise Wrote: [ -> ]It hasnt said club paradiso for ages ?

Precisely. So why are we still getting Club Paradiso?


Sarcasm is lost on some, isn't it?

(24-07-2011 17:05 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]Precisely. So why are we still getting Club Paradiso?


Sarcasm is lost on some, isn't it?

ahhh I have been up since 4am, thats my excuse and I'm sticking to it.....

I am intrigued tho, I read this forum a lot and I do wonder what exactly you guys wants from a channel? There is a lot of moaning/constructive/unconstructive criticism on here. If you don't like it or think it is all same old same old then why do you carry on watching and calling?
there must be some appeal if you do carry on being a caller / watcher / fan?

(24-07-2011 18:18 )Louise Wrote: [ -> ][snip] ... there must be some appeal if you do carry on being a caller / watcher / fan?

Not really, Louise. As I've said before, we continue to check in (and I think that 'checking in' is about as much as any casual viewer does these days - as opposed to watching, that is) in the hope that things may have improved.

I flick through from 967 downwards, about eight or nine times per night (usually during the ads on the mainstream channels). I very rarely stop on any of the channels for longer than a couple of minutes - most get nothing more that a customary glance of a couple of seconds.

Now I don't know about anyone else, but this is what amounts to me 'watching' the channels these days.

(24-07-2011 21:35 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]

(24-07-2011 18:18 )Louise Wrote: [ -> ][snip] ... there must be some appeal if you do carry on being a caller / watcher / fan?

Not really, Louise. As I've said before, we continue to check in (and I think that 'checking in' is about as much as any casual viewer does these days - as opposed to watching, that is) in the hope that things may have improved.

I flick through from 967 downwards, about eight or nine times per night (usually during the ads on the mainstream channels). I very rarely stop on any of the channels for longer than a couple of minutes - most get nothing more that a customary glance of a couple of seconds.

Now I don't know about anyone else, but this is what amounts to me 'watching' the channels these days.

I totally see where you are coming from it just seems that its more negative views than positive from some people who are watchers (in respect of your definition of watcher I mean)
personally you are more constructive than most with your views on the channels.
I think its really hard now to please everyone.....with the ofcoms rules, the channels not wanting to push the boundaries after the fall of bang. And you have to consider the girls as well. not every daytime girl wants to push the boundaries talking wise.....as much as I am sure not every night time girl want to get 100% naked.
I would like to see more positive views from people on here about the channels but I can't quite work out with people are after....hence my post in the daytime thread.
xx

I always give the channels numbered 9... a good view every night. A lot of it is intrigue and curiosity to see who's on and see if there's any favourite girls of mine on. I do tend to continue leaving the channels on the tv while I'm working on my computer, so not watching them every minute but they're usually on most nights. Every so often I'll flick to another one to give them all a good view at some point during the nights. Some channels will get more viewing depending if a favourite babe is on.

As for actually calling though, I haven't called the night shows for a long while. Have called daytime shows more than night shows.

(24-07-2011 21:45 )Louise Wrote: [ -> ]I would like to see more positive views from people on here about the channels but I can't quite work out with people are after....hence my post in the daytime thread.
xx

Well you kind of answered your own question about the amount of negative comments, and that comes mainly the channels fear of Ofcom.

It's human nature really, if you don't get as much of what you had before, then you're more likely to be more negative and watch/use a service less. The price of gas going up isn't likely to generate more positive comments on a gas forum.

I don't think that many comments are really personal to the girls or channels, as most understand the restrictions that are in place, or understand that some girls don't do what others do.

About Storm in particular, the main contention was the promise of something new from CP that hasn't really materialized yet. To their credit they've explained that they are delays to that, so fair enough.

(27-07-2011 12:48 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ]About Storm in particular, the main contention was the promise of something new from CP that hasn't really materialized yet. To their credit they've explained that they are delays to that, so fair enough.

to be fair there are delays and then their is seemingly doing nothing at all, storm have had the keys for 8 weeks now and in that time the only new things they have done are the swing set which seems to have gone and the 11am naughty hour which was a very good idea but was dropped due to the stream not working, will here is some news its been fine for the last 2-3 weeks but the show has not come back
if i had not watched 966 for 6 months and put it on last night i would not of known anything had changed,
on the plus side storm has a good roster and the day show is i think the best as the girls are aloud to do a bit more then the outer channels,
i think what they need to do is make the channel look different to all the outer channels, i would ditch the beds and have a number of more interesting sets, i think they should also have 2 girls every night