The UK Babe Channels Forum

Yes, it would seem so. Still, at least Storm have Twitter and can at least post some pics.

pics on titter lol god that's depressing isn't it

(04-07-2014 07:45 )Lotuseater Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-07-2014 01:02 )BarrieBF Wrote: [ -> ]I'm looking at the Storm picture now and it doesn't look that bad. I'd say it was reasonable and not a lot worse than some of the other channels.

I think it is more a case of the other channels degrading their own picture quality to save money on bandwidth and data charges and coming down to Storm's low level, rather than Storm improving.

Storm varies dramatically depending on whether it is day or night show. The daytime picture quality is simply dire, but thats no bad thing because their day girls are so ugly.

so true

That's a bit mean. I'm sure one could look at some of their competitors and say they were of equal standard. Not that I'm going to make suggestions because that sinks to the same level, and besides I don't want my face smashed in

I like Scarlet. So clearly not all the Storm Day Babes are awful. In fact, I'd say only the morning ones are because we don't know their names and because they just lie there waving their phones..

(I know through the screencaps posted)

There's been no webstream for six months now so I think we can draw our own conclusions

I wonder did they rise the call price because of other channels complanets about competition?

Why would they care about other channels complaining?

(15-07-2014 22:54 )mr williams Wrote: [ -> ]There's been no webstream for six months now so I think we can draw our own conclusions

Like they don't get many calls from the webstream?

(01-08-2014 12:43 )zizelmy Wrote: [ -> ]Like they don't get many calls from the webstream?

Didn't Storm actually say at one point that their webstream accounted for almost zero calls? If so it wouldn't be worth the cost of running it.