(19-01-2012 10:56 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ]The channel rep was online here last night but made a conscious choice not to communicate with his customers about why there was no show. It was the wrong choice.
That is a very true statement Digital Dave, it was the wrong choice. But I think people were being too arrogant in demanding that they make the right choice. It is everyone's right to be in the wrong if that's their choice.
(19-01-2012 10:31 )William H Bonney Wrote: [ -> ]Anyway I hope it really is a temporary problem and that they return soon, in which case I look forward to seeing more of Roxy Belle. 
Your wish is granted on both counts, as The Minx has just opened the day show!
That's a confused way of putting it elgar. I think you mean that Storm have poor PR but that it's their inalienable right to have poor PR and people shouldn't be overly critical if that's their choice?
(19-01-2012 12:49 )William H Bonney Wrote: [ -> ]people shouldn't be overly critical if that's their choice?
I'm not saying that people shouldn't be overly critical, I'm saying that people shouldn't be overly rude.
(19-01-2012 12:48 )mr williams Wrote: [ -> ] (19-01-2012 10:31 )William H Bonney Wrote: [ -> ]Anyway I hope it really is a temporary problem and that they return soon, in which case I look forward to seeing more of Roxy Belle.
Your wish is granted on both counts, as The Minx has just opened the day show!
Hurrah! Thank you for being the bearer of good news mr williams. I always knew that you were a good guy.
Roxy Belle is my belle.
(19-01-2012 10:56 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ]in fact companies are obliged to communicate properly with their customers for sound commercial reasons.
Storm disagree. The standpoint of Storm appears to be a very straightforward one: they believe they have more important things to do than engage with their own customers. (What those more important things are I couldn't say).
Ah well, it's difficult to be too cross with them when they put Roxy Belle on in the daytime - wonderfully sexy!
(19-01-2012 16:50 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ]Ah well, it's difficult to be too cross with them when they put Roxy Belle on in the daytime - wonderfully sexy!
Aye it is if you don't watch the day show's, it might be something to do with the lack of titillation
(19-01-2012 16:54 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ] (19-01-2012 16:50 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ]Ah well, it's difficult to be too cross with them when they put Roxy Belle on in the daytime - wonderfully sexy!
Aye it is if you don't watch the day show's, it might be something to do with the lack of titillation
a member on here should be elected spokesperson to communicate with the pr of the channels that way they wont have to think that they have to lower themselves to talk to us mere mortals ,and at the same time questions could be raised through the spokesperson without it becoming a pitch battle on here,thats IF they agreed themselves to it !
With Hannah being on last night correct if I'm wrong to the extent of ladies currently employed on the night shows.
Hannah,Cali,Elle,Roxanna(not seen lately), Sydney JJ (not seen lately), Chantel (occasionally), Roxy (on nights occasionally).
Can this be sufficient to make the channel viable because even though I like all the Storm babes, they can be overplayed and thereby reduced phone in time.