18-11-2010, 20:39
And (based on a 5 minute scan earlier today) it looks like 967 has slightly higher picture quality than 954, and 954 is still a good bit better than 955 (which was getting to be unwatchable).
It was easy to compare the two when 954 and 955 were running the same camera feed, even though 955 was usually about 10 seconds behind 954.
Asian Babes (and LA Babes before it) always had stupidly low picture quality: bad enough to make me wonder if any kind of capacity contract was involved at all.
There was a channel hosting Asian Babes at the top of the 800's (forget the exact number) for a few days up until today or yesterday, but it's gone today. And 967 is now the highest adult channel number before the Sky users guide. It's not as easy to type on the remote control as 966 is, at least not with one hand (hey, that's a serious usability issue!)
How long does it usually take to get channel names and EPG timeslots edited? I know that it can't be done at the drop of a hat (otherwise PVR's and online listings can get confused) but some of the babe channels haven't had their names changed in years.
It was easy to compare the two when 954 and 955 were running the same camera feed, even though 955 was usually about 10 seconds behind 954.
Asian Babes (and LA Babes before it) always had stupidly low picture quality: bad enough to make me wonder if any kind of capacity contract was involved at all.
There was a channel hosting Asian Babes at the top of the 800's (forget the exact number) for a few days up until today or yesterday, but it's gone today. And 967 is now the highest adult channel number before the Sky users guide. It's not as easy to type on the remote control as 966 is, at least not with one hand (hey, that's a serious usability issue!)
How long does it usually take to get channel names and EPG timeslots edited? I know that it can't be done at the drop of a hat (otherwise PVR's and online listings can get confused) but some of the babe channels haven't had their names changed in years.
