(21-08-2011 06:46 )eagle_si Wrote: [ -> ]I was so looking forward to the Hannah video that was scheduled for today, especially after seeing the August promo. So it's a huge disappointment to see that it's only 45 seconds long, not including the logo at the start and finish. 
What was the point of that? Surely it could have been made longer.
Most of the videos are very short, like 3 minutes tops. Some are longer, but none of them are over ten minutes, and even the long ones don't get started until halfway into them. Most are very tame as well with little to no full frontal. Kind of pointless to have a website that is even tamer than the night shows! So far, Dionne has been the only one who has impressed me on the website. All of the other women have shown much more on other sites in the past.
(21-08-2011 13:08 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Most of the videos are very short, like 3 minutes tops. Some are longer, but none of them are over ten minutes, and even the long ones don't get started until halfway into them. Most are very tame as well with little to no full frontal. Kind of pointless to have a website that is even tamer than the night shows! So far, Dionne has been the only one who has impressed me on the website. All of the other women have shown much more on other sites in the past.
Unlike you, I'm not bothered about full-frontal etc, there are plenty of other sites out there which cater for that. Videos like the Cara/Hannah Prentice one yesterday (which was a shade over 5 minutes) are great, as you certainly can't see Cara just in her undies on TV. So no, it's definitely NOT "pointless" in my view. But having one which is only 45 seconds long is undoubtedly taking the piss.
(21-08-2011 13:35 )eagle_si Wrote: [ -> ]Unlike you, I'm not bothered about full-frontal etc, there are plenty of other sites out there which cater for that. Videos like the Cara/Hannah Prentice one yesterday (which was a shade over 5 minutes) are great, as you certainly can't see Cara just in her undies on TV. So no, it's definitely NOT "pointless" in my view. But having one which is only 45 seconds long is undoubtedly taking the piss.
Well it's pointless to me because we can see Caty, Rachel, Becky, Mica, and Charlie nude and in explicit shots on other sites, yet we can't on the biggest site of them all which is the Elite site. Kind of pointless to tame things this late in the game.
(21-08-2011 13:57 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Well it's pointless to me because we can see Caty, Rachel, Becky, Mica, and Charlie nude and in explicit shots on other sites, yet we can't on the biggest site of them all which is the Elite site. Kind of pointless to tame things this late in the game.
Can you show me these explicit shots of Becky? In fact I'm sure Becky herself would be curious to know where they are, because she hasn't done any.
Apart from that, can I advise you to stop moaning and just cancel your subscription to Elite if it's too tame for you? I'll happily carry on subscribing
(21-08-2011 14:05 )eagle_si Wrote: [ -> ]Can you show me these explicit shots of Becky? In fact I'm sure Becky herself would be curious to know where they are, because she hasn't done any.
Apart from that, can I advise you to stop moaning and just cancel your subscription to Elite if it's too tame for you? I'll happily carry on subscribing
Maybe not super explicit, but Becky has shown full frontal on other sites before, and on GSL as well. Breathtakers is one site I think where she's gone full frontal. Caty on Sexstation and her past night shows, Mica on Brook Lee Playmates, Rachel on Breathtakers, playboy and another site I think, Charlie on Simonscans. Just seems like a ploy to trick people into re-subscribing to the Elite site in hopes of seeing full frontal nudity, when they likely aren't going to. It's not like these women are uptight in this respect, so there must be other reasons. I have stopped my membership, because it was tame, other than Dionne.
Trick people? Did I miss the part of the site that says 'come see the girls going hardcore explicit'
I don't have a problem with the level of content on Elite's website. Some models do and have got explicit content on there. Danielle Maye, Sophia Knight, Anna Lovato, Tori Black, Alexis Texas, to name just a few. I personally think for £10 per month, you get dam good value for money. It's not like there charging £20 per month like some of the other sites. And you don't get anymore explicit content on those either.
It's totally upto the models themselves, how much they are willing show. And of course, how much the particular site is willing to pay them for doing more explicit video & photoshoots.
This is a bussiness for the models as well, not just Elite.
In most cases, mentioned, those full frontal shoots were done very early in the girls careers. Not at all uncommon for girls starting in the business to get into those kind of shoots as they try to establish themselves, only to stop later. Also not uncommon for girls to do slightly more explicit stuff for certain sites but not for others, i.e. many girls will go naked for Playboy but not elsewhere.
To suggest that a girl has gone nude once so she is OK with it and should continue, and if she doesn't, there is some conspiracy involved is simply crazy. Should your ex-girlfriend continue shagging you on demand since she used to do it, and was OK with it then?
The girls who did nude work were happy to do it at that time, for that site/company, doesn't mean they want to continue doing it now. Their career may be at a different place, their family and personal circumstances may be different etc.
And as stated, the website doesn't actually advertise explicit hardcore content, and there is also a thread here offering regular previews of photos and videos available, so I don't see any trickery.
munch
(21-08-2011 14:13 )gazfc Wrote: [ -> ]Trick people? Did I miss the part of the site that says 'come see the girls going hardcore explicit'
No
It doesn't say that. However, the promos make it seem as if the women are going to show more, yet when you watch the videos, they are barely longer than the promos and no full frontal is shown. I can understand the women only showing more on other sites, but that would be down to money right, if they are getting paid more there than on the Elite site, or else why not do it for Elite? It's the best looking site out there, but the tame content brings it down quite a bit. Mica has done full frontal for Brooke Lee Playmates, only in a few sets, yet there's barely any of that on Elite, where she has many more sets and videos, which seems odd to me. Why do it one place, but not the other, especially not on a better site? They make things complicated for the fans IMO because of a lack of consistency. Georgie has been like this recently, when a full frontal pic of her was posted by someone. Georgie had it deleted and replaced with the same pic but with no crotch detail shown, and said the first pic had been photoshopped and that she doesn't do open leg, yet she allowed more explicit shots of her to remain on her thread, and has made an attempt to show more on the night shows. I must be on crazy pills.
(21-08-2011 06:46 )eagle_si Wrote: [ -> ]I was so looking forward to the Hannah video that was scheduled for today, especially after seeing the August promo. So it's a huge disappointment to see that it's only 45 seconds long, not including the logo at the start and finish. What was the point of that? Surely it could have been made longer.
With regards to this query. I have passed it on to Alan. Alan said he was surprised as well, at this one being as short as it is. He has raised the issue with the video guys, so hopefully all future videos will be longer. But he also said, that a short video is still better than no video at all.
All the best
Ace.