The UK Babe Channels Forum

(23-04-2013 15:09 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]He is in the process of setting up a foundation to help like-minded individuals break away from the hold and life dominance of the Babe Shows.

Are you for real

The man can't even help himself, what qualifies him to try helping anyone else? He's a thief and a fraud. He fraudulently stole thousands of pounds worth of service from vodafone knowing full well he had no ability to pay it back. If this had been cold hard cash stolen from a bank or suchlike, he'd be locked up by now.

I'm seriously wondering who is the more deluded here, our Kev, or you for coming here posting this nonsense and sticking up for him like this.

Might I suggest you both meet up. Once together, stand approximately two feet apart, face to face. Then sway gently backwards, then rapidly forwards until your foreheads collide. Repeat until you have knocked some sense into each other!

Thought this thread had run it's course, but it just keeps getting funnier

"He is in the process of setting up a foundation to help like-minded individuals break away from the hold and life dominance of the Babe Shows"


Wankaholics Anonymous

i am doubtful of kev's credentials for carrying out his chosen mission, as i fear that treatment for phone sex addiction would be extremely difficult or impossible to achieve without experienced professional help.

phone sex addiction can no doubt be effectively treated with the same techniques used to treat other behavioral addictions and chemical dependency, but successful recovery requires rehabilitation of the mind from the psychological effects of the gripping disease. neural pathways in the brain are chemically rewired by any form of addiction and must inevitably be reprogrammed through appropriate therapeutic techniques.

(23-04-2013 20:05 )munch1917 Wrote: [ -> ]Are you for real

The man can't even help himself, what qualifies him to try helping anyone else? He's a thief and a fraud. He fraudulently stole thousands of pounds worth of service from vodafone knowing full well he had no ability to pay it back. If this had been cold hard cash stolen from a bank or suchlike, he'd be locked up by now.

I'm seriously wondering who is the more deluded here, our Kev, or you for coming here posting this nonsense and sticking up for him like this.

Excuse me, did I say that I think his idea was a good one? Did I say that he is qualified to operate such a foundation? I mentioned what he had said publicly, that he intends to set up such an organisation.

And "sticking up for him"? No. You claim he is a thief and a fraud, perhaps he is in many peoples eyes. My initial post is that this thread should also be deleted on those grounds, but of course that would spoil your fun with dishing out insults.

And I believe you are the one who likes to roll out the phrase "Get on with your own life". I believe Kev is doing just that. I wont suggest that you do the same.

(23-04-2013 20:35 )way out west Wrote: [ -> ]i am doubtful of kev's credentials for carrying out his chosen mission, as i fear that treatment for phone sex addiction would be extremely difficult or impossible to achieve without experienced professional help.

phone sex addiction can no doubt be effectively treated with the same techniques used to treat other behavioral addictions and chemical dependency, but successful recovery requires rehabilitation of the mind from the psychological effects of the gripping disease. neural pathways in the brain are chemically rewired by any form of addiction and must inevitably be reprogrammed through appropriate therapeutic techniques.

I'm not sure the addiction was to "phone sex", rather his perceived "connection" to the girls that he primarily called on the day shows.

He was obviously in need of recognition and attention, he needed for his voice to be heard. He chose to ignore the reality of the situation, that the girl on screen is purely a gateway to a commercial transaction.

By ignoring this harsh reality, that the person interacting with you has no desire to interact with you outside a "pay wall", he also chose to ignore the mounting phone bill that was stacking up.

Someone who chooses to ignore the consequences of repetitive action is clearly an addict. Kev became addicted.

When you choose to confront your addiction you become like a prize fighter, you stand in the opposite corner to your opponent, you constantly have to duck and weave, never let you guard down. Kev is fortunate in that he has seen the true face of his opponent, that it is ugly, far too repugnant to even step into the "ring" with. The "real world" came knocking. And he answered the door.

(23-04-2013 20:22 )KRISB Wrote: [ -> ]"He is in the process of setting up a foundation to help like-minded individuals break away from the hold and life dominance of the Babe Shows"


Wankaholics Anonymous

Not so much the "wanking", that has clear benefits to ones health.
It would be catered towards the people who dedicate their entire existence to "the girls".

(23-04-2013 23:52 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]

(23-04-2013 20:22 )KRISB Wrote: [ -> ]"He is in the process of setting up a foundation to help like-minded individuals break away from the hold and life dominance of the Babe Shows"


Wankaholics Anonymous

Not so much the "wanking", that has clear benefits to ones health.
It would be catered towards the people who dedicate their entire existence to "the girls".

Really?

I better get to work so

(23-04-2013 15:59 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]

(23-04-2013 15:13 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]So you are speaking on his behalf, then.

I wish you'd make up your mind

No, if I was speaking on his behalf, then this thread would have already vanished.

to "speak on behalf of a person or entity" is to "speak on their side or part as their explicitly or implicitly delegated representative."

To mention that he has publicly spoken about an individuals comments on this thread being devastating towards him is not "acting as a delegated representative".

Yes, very clever. If he's genuinely upset by this thread I don't know why you're even arguing, or did you not read my post properly?

(22-04-2013 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]Since the discussion relates to a news story widely published in a number of newspapers and websites (the comments pages of which, make this place look like a Sunday school meeting) I don't see what the problem is, unless 'Kev' himself complains

(23-04-2013 23:47 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]he also chose to ignore the mounting phone bill that was stacking up

He wasn't ignoring it, he was bragging about it.

(08-04-2013 13:01 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]He was well aware of the costs, on his twitter account he was sending tweets to Mr Studio 66TV when he reached the £51,000 mark reminding Jamie he was his best ever customer.

(23-04-2013 23:27 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]And "sticking up for him"? No. You claim he is a thief and a fraud, perhaps he is in many peoples eyes. My initial post is that this thread should also be deleted on those grounds, but of course that would spoil your fun with dishing out insults.

The above paragraph was edited by a Moderator in such a way that it portrays me as saying that this thread should be deleted because of Kev's "fraud and theft."

To clarify: After I wrote "And "sticking up for him"? No. You claim he is a thief and a fraud, perhaps he is in many peoples eyes." there was another paragraph, unrelated to "theft and fraud", it then followed with: "My initial post is that this thread should also be deleted on those grounds, but of course that would spoil your fun with dishing out insults."

I did not suggest that this thread should be deleted because of Kev's actions. The edit to my post does not reflect my opinion.

(24-04-2013 00:09 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, very clever. If he's genuinely upset by this thread I don't know why you're even arguing, or did you not read my post properly?

I am not his delegated representative. Simple as that.

(22-04-2013 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]Since the discussion relates to a news story widely published in a number of newspapers and websites (the comments pages of which, make this place look like a Sunday school meeting) I don't see what the problem is, unless 'Kev' himself complains

I answered you previously, if you use the "find" tab at the bottom of this post it will point you in the right direction.

(22-04-2013 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]He wasn't ignoring it, he was bragging about it.

An addict can be aware of a problem and be able to ignore the consequences. Hence "addiction". He wasn't bragging about the root cause of his addiction, he was bragging that he was STD 66's best ever customer.

(24-04-2013 00:50 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]I am not his delegated representative. Simple as that.

Then why are you acting like you are? Why doesn't Kev contact Admin himself if he's unhappy with what's being said here?

(24-04-2013 00:50 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]I answered you previously, if you use the "find" tab at the bottom of this post it will point you in the right direction

You mean this one?

(22-04-2013 14:18 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]

(22-04-2013 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]And when he's done that perhaps he could go through the whole forum and delete any threads belonging to babes who aren't members.

The whole "discussion of babes that aren't members has already been clarified.

(22-04-2013 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]Since the discussion relates to a news story widely published in a number of newspapers and websites (the comments pages of which, make this place look like a Sunday school meeting) I don't see what the problem is, unless 'Kev' himself complains.

The fact that it has been discussed in Newspapers doesn't mean anything. Other news stories concerning Babeshow fans that made the national press have been deleted/forbidden from being discussed on this site.

If members here see this thread they will get the impression that active, relevant, topical, yet civilized discussion is encouraged by this website and yet you ask the question: "I don't see what the problem is".

I haven't a clue what you're talking about. I asked you elaborate on your first point and you ignored the question.

(24-04-2013 07:06 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]Then why are you acting like you are? Why doesn't Kev contact Admin himself if he's unhappy with what's being said here?

Kev's internet access is somewhat limited at the moment, he has been forced into using a PAYG service on his phone. There have been several attempts to upload a video to youtube before running out of data allowance. Addressing every issue is sadly impossible due to his predicament.

(24-04-2013 07:06 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]You mean this one?

That's the one.

(22-04-2013 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]I haven't a clue what you're talking about. I asked you elaborate on your first point and you ignored the question.

Yes you did. Yes I did.

(23-04-2013 15:05 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]He is in the process of setting up a foundation to help like-minded individuals break away from the hold and life dominance of the Babe Shows.

How many like-minded individuals does he estimate there are in need of this assistance?