Rammy, @AyVeeWan isn't the person who posted on here as AV1, it's just another Twitter troll pretending to be someone who was pretending to be someone else
thanks smc thought it was thegazav1aston that was on here till he got outed
(10-04-2013 14:59 )rogerthedoger Wrote: [ -> ]Vodafone has an understanding you make a calls they charge you
Funny things these businesses. There to make money. Disgusting, really. Shouldn't be allowed.
(10-04-2013 15:50 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]doubt he's found £91,000 so quick after story broke
Perhaps a well wisher paid it for him?
I have no sympathy for the guy, but I know how the call girls can wheel you in. I've never called any of the lines before but from what I've heard I know that they're very good at making you feel special and that they want you. But the guy should've known that the girls are paid to say the things you want to hear
Knowing the way the press work and wanting to spice things up I wouldnt be surprised in reality that the real amount was possibly actually far less than £91,000 and that figure used to spice the article up and maybe show as a warning to maybe deter people ringing up mega excess bills like that.
However as we know certain other newspapers boost there incomes running adverts for these chat lines.
(10-04-2013 22:04 )alwayswanking Wrote: [ -> ]I have no sympathy for the guy, but I know how the call girls can wheel you in. I've never called any of the lines before but from what I've heard I know that they're very good at making you feel special and that they want you. But the guy should've known that the girls are paid to say the things you want to hear
So do double glazing salesmen, door to door electricity salesman, Mormon missionaries and loads of others. Its not as if being made to feel special is unique to chatlines.
(10-04-2013 17:54 )Sm© Wrote: [ -> ]it's just another Twitter troll pretending to be someone who was pretending to be someone else
This forum should be made into a movie, there's so many plot twists in it.
They(Vodafone) reduced it to £29,000 ish as they admitted they should have warned him about how much he was spending/cut second sim card off sooner
(10-04-2013 22:06 )HoneyRocks Wrote: [ -> ]Knowing the way the press work and wanting to spice things up I wouldnt be surprised in reality that the real amount was possibly actually far less than £91,000 and that figure used to spice the article up and maybe show as a warning to maybe deter people ringing up mega excess bills like that.
However as we know certain other newspapers boost there incomes running adverts for these chat lines.
I don't want to seem unsympathetic but by reducing the bill first time round they seem to have sent out a message that he can get away with it.