(22-04-2013 10:54 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]I think the Admin should delete this thread as "Kev" isn't a member here.
And when he's done that perhaps he could go through the whole forum and delete any threads belonging to babes who aren't members.
Since the discussion relates to a news story widely published in a number of newspapers and websites (the comments pages of which, make this place look like a Sunday school meeting) I don't see what the problem is, unless 'Kev' himself complains.
(22-04-2013 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]And when he's done that perhaps he could go through the whole forum and delete any threads belonging to babes who aren't members.
The whole "discussion of babes that aren't members has already been clarified.
(22-04-2013 13:43 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]Since the discussion relates to a news story widely published in a number of newspapers and websites (the comments pages of which, make this place look like a Sunday school meeting) I don't see what the problem is, unless 'Kev' himself complains.
The fact that it has been discussed in Newspapers doesn't mean anything. Other news stories concerning Babeshow fans that made the national press have been deleted/forbidden from being discussed on this site.
If members here see this thread they will get the impression that active, relevant, topical, yet civilized discussion is encouraged by this website and yet you ask the question: "I don't see what the problem is".
(12-04-2013 12:18 )old compton Wrote: [ -> ]He had paid for all his bets, but sued William Hill to try and get the money back from them, on the grounds that they owed him a care of duty as a problem gambler and they shouldn't have let him bet so much in the first place.
Yes he'd asked William Hill to close his account with them, to stop him gambling, but although they agreed to do so they didn't get round to doing it and so his betting continued.
(22-04-2013 14:18 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]The whole "discussion of babes that aren't members has already been clarified.
I don't get around the forum that much, you'll have to enlighten me.
(22-04-2013 14:18 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]If members here see this thread they will get the impression that active, relevant, topical, yet civilized discussion is encouraged by this website and yet you ask the question: "I don't see what the problem is".
(22-04-2013 15:23 )seth Wrote: [ -> ]How do you know Kev isn't a member here?
A very good question seth!
(22-04-2013 15:23 )seth Wrote: [ -> ]How do you know Kev isn't a member here?
I spoke to him on the other forum.
(22-04-2013 14:59 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ]Yes he'd asked William Hill to close his account with them, to stop him gambling, but although they agreed to do so they didn't get round to doing it and so his betting continued.
That guy was in a whole different league to Kev, despite the obvious similarities. I just looked it up and the amount he lost in bets with William Hill was £2,052,972.
(22-04-2013 20:25 )MONEY BANG Wrote: [ -> ]I spoke to him on the other forum.
Did you try to Instruct him in the long lost art of Personal Responsibility by any chance?
Failing that, you could just tell him he's an Oxygen Thief.
Kev has been quiet on his Twitter recently, but he does offer this advice: "take it from me do not make my mistakes, learn from my bad experience and hold on to your money and self respect".