(03-05-2014 13:04 )modelflat Wrote: [ -> ]Funny how the shoulder straps can't stay on their shoulders... they must be very silky or something.
These two have just taken over on the couch in some sexy outfits
i cee the girls have a laptop does anyone know there email adress and apple is so hottttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
does anyone know the girls email address
nice to see nadia with a thong on last night
(04-05-2014 06:06 )snookerloopy Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2014 13:04 )modelflat Wrote: [ -> ]Funny how the shoulder straps can't stay on their shoulders... they must be very silky or something.
These two have just taken over on the couch in some sexy outfits
i cee the girls have a laptop does anyone know there email adress and apple is so hottttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
does anyone know the girls email address
im a straight guy but apple is beautiful ladyboy or no ladyboy I would love to with apple
(09-05-2014 08:30 )snookerloopy Wrote: [ -> ]im a straight guy but apple is beautiful ladyboy or no ladyboy I would love to with apple
I have to pull you up on this. First off, I do not know which one is Apple, so can't say either way whether or not she's a ladyboy.
Secondly, each to their own, live and let live, etc etc, but if you're going to start using labels, you have to live by those labels.
To say you fancy Apple or any of the other ladyboys (if indeed Apple is a ladyboy) is perfectly fine, but please do not label yourself as 'straight' before declaring this, as it is simply a contradiction in terms.
A better analogy might be to say it's like saying you're a strict vegetarian, but that you always have a bacon butty every Sunday morning.
(10-05-2014 01:05 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ]I have to pull you up on this. First off, I do not know which one is Apple, so can't say either way whether or not she's a ladyboy.
Secondly, each to their own, live and let live, etc etc, but if you're going to start using labels, you have to live by those labels.
To say you fancy Apple or any of the other ladyboys (if indeed Apple is a ladyboy) is perfectly fine, but please do not label yourself as 'straight' before declaring this, as it is simply a contradiction in terms.
A better analogy might be to say it's like saying you're a strict vegetarian, but that you always have a bacon butty every Sunday morning.
Apple is definitely NOT a ladyboy!!
Once you see her for yourself, it'll be clear ....unless you're shortsighted with a blurry TV screen
(10-05-2014 10:44 )gruntmeister Wrote: [ -> ]Apple is definitely NOT a ladyboy!!
Once you see her for yourself, it'll be clear ....unless you're shortsighted with a blurry TV screen
Yes, if I knew which one she was I'd certainly know for sure.
(10-05-2014 01:05 )JuanKerr Wrote: [ -> ]I have to pull you up on this. First off, I do not know which one is Apple, so can't say either way whether or not she's a ladyboy.
Secondly, each to their own, live and let live, etc etc, but if you're going to start using labels, you have to live by those labels.
To say you fancy Apple or any of the other ladyboys (if indeed Apple is a ladyboy) is perfectly fine, but please do not label yourself as 'straight' before declaring this, as it is simply a contradiction in terms.
A better analogy might be to say it's like saying you're a strict vegetarian, but that you always have a bacon butty every Sunday morning.
I have to pull you up on this, who are you to tell someone what their sexuality is, if someone sees themselves as being straight, they are well within their own right to do so, since ladyboys are the essence of femininity it makes you look like some sort of ignorant idiot to say he is gay. If he was he would fancy men. All this shows is your lack of acceptance of someone different from yourself.
(11-05-2014 11:36 )kooky3076 Wrote: [ -> ]I have to pull you up on this, who are you to tell someone what their sexuality is, if someone sees themselves as being straight, they are well within their own right to do so, since ladyboys are the essence of femininity it makes you look like some sort of ignorant idiot to say he is gay. If he was he would fancy men. All this shows is your lack of acceptance of someone different from yourself.
No it doesn't. He was the one who decided to use labels. Look up 'straight' in the dictionary (you'll have to dig fairly deeply before you find the definition that is relevant here). I think you'll see that finding transgenders/ladyboys sexually attractive doesn't come under this.
I have no issue with his sexual preference - I was merely pointing out his contradiction.
(11-05-2014 11:36 )kooky3076 Wrote: [ -> ]I have to pull you up on this, who are you to tell someone what their sexuality is, if someone sees themselves as being straight, they are well within their own right to do so, since ladyboys are the essence of femininity it makes you look like some sort of ignorant idiot to say he is gay. If he was he would fancy men. All this shows is your lack of acceptance of someone different from yourself.
Ladyboys are the essence of femininity? Sure they are, with that cock attached to their body. If someone fancies a ladyboy then he's gay or bi,
not straight. Nothing wrong in that, so what's the point of denying one's own sexuality?
(12-05-2014 01:31 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ]Nothing wrong in that, so what's the point of denying one's own sexuality?
That just about sums it up, really. If we'd never had labels to begin with, we wouldn't have half the sexism, racism and prejudices we do now.