I'll never understand where the confusion comes from. The ladyboys stick out like sore fucking thumbs.
Just a pointer for those of you who still struggle - the ladyboys are the ones who look like men dressed up as women.
(26-09-2012 22:35 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]I'll never understand where the confusion comes from. The ladyboys stick out like sore fucking thumbs.
Just a pointer for those of you who still struggle - the ladyboys are the ones who look like men dressed up as women.
Back with the tedious exaggerations, huh? Your cause is on shaky ground to start with (narrow-minded, segregational), but this whole, clunking Desperate Dan-in-a-bikini line of attack undermines it further. Any confusion arises because to all intents and purposes they look like women dressed up as women! A generalised bulge is a generalised bulge, as long as underwear remains in place. Shemale legs are as shapely in exactly the same way that Priya and Preeti's legs are, or as any notably shapely pair or babeshow legs are - contour, proportion and surface skin quality define this (serge's guide above makes useful reading). Anybody who won't at least be honest about the basic visual evidence is harbouring issues, as they say.
I'm not harbouring any issues, Addison. Sorry to disappoint.
No, I genuinely and sincerely find their appearance very off-putting. They may well have 'shapely' legs, but what the hell does that mean anyway? It's a bit like saying Sylvester Stallone's mum has an 'interesting' face. A poster recently said they have shapely legs in the way Steffi Graf has shapely legs. Well it just so happens, and this is not a word of a lie, I've always considered Steffi's legs quite masculine.
You can stress your views and opinions all you like, but as far as I'm concerned the ladyboys are not remotely feminine in any way shape or form. They have broad shoulders, 'shapely' legs, rock hard silicone implants, masculine facial features, no hips, flat and boney arses... funnily enough they have all the features of, oh let me think.... yeah, that's it; a man *
* Silicone implants aside, of course.
(27-09-2012 00:23 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]I genuinely and sincerely find their appearance very off-putting. They may well have 'shapely' legs, but what the hell does that mean anyway? It's a bit like saying Sylvester Stallone's mum has an 'interesting' face. A poster recently said they have shapely legs in the way Steffi Graf has shapely legs. Well it just so happens, and this is not a word of a lie, I've always considered Steffi's legs quite masculine [...]
Shapely? Sexy or hot or something akin (it's a bit old-school, but then I'm a bit of an old-school fart!) I'm not sure how I'd describe Sylvester Stallone's mum’s face, but presumably you'd insist that it still has more feminine allure than Balloon's, Mrs Stallone being a natural-born woman? I'd say the opposite, (the younger Jackie Stallone would still come off second). And if a natural-born female tennis player can have masculine legs, then it stands to reason that a non-natural born female can have feminine legs. The point is that visual sex appeal isn't something that you determine can or can't exist beforehand, by consulting the gender section of a birth certificate or listing a set of requirements on a sheet. You might not like the shemales on the show, but I think it's the idea of them you don't like. Your masculine pride or sense of tradition or whatever can't reconcile what your eyes see with what your brain knows. You're being 'tricked' and you can't loosen up and go with the flow, hence the wildly exaggerated descriptions and put-downs.
Addison, I'm about as sensitive and gentle as blokes come, so masculine pride has bugger all to do with it.
Anyway, we've been over this countless times and we're only going to come to the same conclusion yet again; you see one thing in the shemales, I see another.
Ice & Kipsi opened the TV show this morning, Om took over from the 2 shemales on the Hardcore nightshow,
...... but Hardcore webstream now offline......
Inevitably it wasn't too long before Ice & Om swapped places, don't think Kipsi's keen on the rude stuff though,
......so she'll probably stay on the TV show.
An all female show this morning......
And another all shemale show tonight
(01-10-2012 00:40 )disconnected Wrote: [ -> ]And another all shemale show tonight
disconnected, I can virtually feel your pain and angst surging through the interweb. Lets hope this cry doesn't go unnoticed with those that hopefully read these forums and are in a position to do something about it. I'll even say pretty please if that'll help...
btw I'm not taking the piss, I am 100% with you.
Don't know what is up with the Sky feed this afternoon, just turned to 914, almost 3 pm and they are showing Ice and Cherry who was on the morning, just heard Ice saying "only 1 hr left"... while the OSGs shows Angie's and Kipsi's pins??? Gremlins in the works again... Used to see this a lot before, skipping back and to current and previous (recorded?) feeds.
All web feeds appear to be correct, that is with Kipsi and Angie.
flicking over from time to time as am watching the cricket.. 3.10pm & 3.30pm & 4pm, and sky still with Ice / Cherry, guess it's not just a slight hiccup..
perhaps they don't like what Kipsi & Angie are wearing lol
4.15pm and it's showing Angie, Gremlins must have been found and exterminated ..
(02-10-2012 14:59 )KalEl Wrote: [ -> ]Used to see this a lot before, skipping back and to current and previous (recorded?) feeds.
Notice this at some period almost everyday. I've seen it caught in something like a 4-minute loop for a good forty minutes or so before now.