^ If you are giving up topless stuff might i suggest not doing tease hours as your not really suited to them based on your own statement of performance level.
(05-12-2015 11:44 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]due to questionable conduct probably would have been sacked due to bad publicity anyway.
Your claims about 'bad publicity' are way off the mark.
The channels (understandably) welcome and rejoice in any publicity.
(05-12-2015 13:17 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]^ If you are giving up topless stuff might i suggest not doing tease hours as your not really suited to them based on your own statement of performance level.
Just cause Lucy-Anne doesn't go topless on her tease hours doesn't mean she isn't suitable. First of all because babes DO NOT! have to go topless on tease hours. Also lucy is clearly good at the phone sex (which is what the tease hours are mainly about) so brings in the calls for her & s66 hence why she keeps doing them & therefore is suited to doing them.
Why do you watch lucy-anne on her tease hours and have a go at her over and over again when you know what sort of show she does. If you don't like her then don't watch her. Also s66 won't sack Lucy-Anne over her getting gifts from people, mainly because it is not illegal what she and her sisters are doing, also because she is doing it completely independent from s66. As for bad publicity for s66, don't think there has been. Think s66 will have had plenty of good publicity from this and probably got lots of new regular callers who will call Lucy-Anne & other s66 babes from now on.
Also the quite a lot of babeshow babes would be out of a job if the channel bosses used your logic of not using models who get gifts from people
Really annoys me when people want babes off the nightshows etc just because they don't like them
Thanks for the post Lucy-Anne. Completely understand why you've taken the decision to retire from topless modelling & webcam shows. Good luck with everything you & your sisters will be doing from now on. Hope it goes well for you & your sisters
(05-12-2015 14:34 )dominar rygel xvi Wrote: [ -> ]Your claims about 'bad publicity' are way off the mark.
The channels (understandably) welcome and rejoice in any publicity.
Quite. Any press is good press.
There's nothing like a little controversy to spark interest in your business.
If she wants to set an example then there is more honesty in posing topless than rinsing gullible fools.
(05-12-2015 14:47 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ] (05-12-2015 13:17 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]^ If you are giving up topless stuff might i suggest not doing tease hours as your not really suited to them based on your own statement of performance level.
Just cause Lucy-Anne doesn't go topless on her tease hours doesn't mean she isn't suitable. First of all because babes DO NOT! have to go topless on tease hours. Also lucy is clearly good at the phone sex (which is what the tease hours are mainly about) so brings in the calls for her & s66 hence why she keeps doing them & therefore is suited to doing them.
Why do you watch lucy-anne on her tease hours and have a go at her over and over again when you know what sort of show she does. If you don't like her then don't watch her.
Really annoys me when people want babes off the nightshows etc just because they don't like them
As ive said before im happy with her dayshow,i just dont want to see it on nights,particularly when she has gone topless elsewhere,on the subject of tease or in Lucy's case the lack of it i can only refer to the Sky epg description,nowhere is the word tease mentioned,it says S66 Nights so that is what we should get both visually and verbally,lets face it the only true all rounder is Sophia Lares but apart from that putting daybabes who have no visual intent on nights feels dishonest to me and not comparable with their rivals,in summary any babe should be prepared to work to the expected level of the show they are on and unless advertised differently S66 NIGHTS should reflect its age rating and place in the Adult section,not just verbally but Visually too,which is why i think Lucy should not take any more nightshow hours which thanks to their decision to push back the nightshow start,first till 9.30 now 10.00 is exactly what she has been doing,take last night she wore the same outfit all day and barely adjusted it for nights,now that should not be regarded as a suitable level of show in the same way she is thanks to her statement the right type of performer for the show listed and described on my EPG.
^ Well, and at the risk of repeating myself, for me the most relevant criteria would be how many calls she brings in. Lucy Anne appeared to be busy last night when i was watching the show.
Get that useless Lucy off night shows. She is a day rinser not night.
(05-12-2015 16:49 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-12-2015 14:47 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ] (05-12-2015 13:17 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]^ If you are giving up topless stuff might i suggest not doing tease hours as your not really suited to them based on your own statement of performance level.
Just cause Lucy-Anne doesn't go topless on her tease hours doesn't mean she isn't suitable. First of all because babes DO NOT! have to go topless on tease hours. Also lucy is clearly good at the phone sex (which is what the tease hours are mainly about) so brings in the calls for her & s66 hence why she keeps doing them & therefore is suited to doing them.
Why do you watch lucy-anne on her tease hours and have a go at her over and over again when you know what sort of show she does. If you don't like her then don't watch her.
Really annoys me when people want babes off the nightshows etc just because they don't like them
As ive said before im happy with her dayshow,i just dont want to see it on nights,particularly when she has gone topless elsewhere,on the subject of tease or in Lucy's case the lack of it i can only refer to the Sky epg description,nowhere is the word tease mentioned,it says S66 Nights so that is what we should get both visually and verbally,lets face it the only true all rounder is Sophia Lares but apart from that putting daybabes who have no visual intent on nights feels dishonest to me and not comparable with their rivals,in summary any babe should be prepared to work to the expected level of the show they are on and unless advertised differently S66 NIGHTS should reflect its age rating and place in the Adult section,not just verbally but Visually too,which is why i think Lucy should not take any more nightshow hours which thanks to their decision to push back the nightshow start,first till 9.30 now 10.00 is exactly what she has been doing,take last night she wore the same outfit all day and barely adjusted it for nights,now that should not be regarded as a suitable level of show in the same way she is thanks to her statement the right type of performer for the show listed and described on my EPG.
Tell me what is the set expected level or suitable show, Because as far as I'm concerned there isn't one. Lucie-Anne has rules she has to follow in regards to what she can & can't do for each show she does (daytime or tease) other than that she is free to do whatever sort of show she wants that fits these rules & will bring in the most calls, which is the most important thing for Lucie-Anne, otherwise she wouldn't be on the shows. Not everyone has the same expectations for a show as you
Lucie-Anne seems to be busy in each tease show she does so isn't useless and as long as that is the case, s66 will keep having her on past 10pm, the fact you don't like her won't matter one jot to her & s66
(05-12-2015 17:38 )Jack Bishop Wrote: [ -> ]^ Well, and at the risk of repeating myself, for me the most relevant criteria would be how many calls she brings in. Lucy Anne appeared to be busy last night when i was watching the show.
The fact remains that a now self confessed daybabe appeared under false visual pretenses on a nightshow,you may be happy with that but i certainly am not,i must admit i have not called the shows for a while but when i have the babe has never failed me visually,which is perhaps the most interesting part of the debate regarding her suitability for nights,for example if a new caller called and asked her to go topless when permitted and she refused would Studio 66 refund them for not really recieving verbal and visual value for money,somehow i doubt it,in summary daybabes at night should only be on nights if want to do it properly,what Lucy has been doing is mediocre at best.