The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(22-11-2015 22:40 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ]it will be down to S66 to decide whether their latest poster girl brings in enough revenue to make them overlook her aleged way of earning quite a large amount of money and the bad publicity that wii probably go with it

It's hardly alleged if she's been bragging about it to several newspapers (or at least the one journalist who passed it around) and I really don't see why S66 would have a problem with it. If anything they'll probably be glad that she has so many fans who are willing to send that much and they say no publicity is bad publicity. She tweeted last night to basically say how hard she works at two jobs and being a Mum, so do lots of people who don't have random guys sending them thousands of pounds worth of gifts Rolleyes
^ I saw that tweet too. She sounded like she was complaining about her work schedule. She COULD always quit working for a wank channel (much like her sister did) if the poor diddums can't handle laying on a bed for 6-8 hours. Crazy to complain. The babe channels, especially the day shows, are as easy as 'work' gets. As for Elite- they won't give a flying fuck about this story. Why would they ? They've been fleecing customers for years too.
I saw the tweet too. I did not see it as moaning, but trying to justify her work in a reply to someone who said she should get a real job.

I can not really see S66 having a problem with the rinsing story it is hardly breaking news.
(23-11-2015 09:55 )DingDong Wrote: [ -> ]This article appears in The Mail

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...ngers.html

Some of Lucy's comments are just wrong and really show her in a bad light.
"My boyfriend doesn’t have a problem with it. He thinks it’s funny, if anything. Although he’s stuck on what to get for Christmas as I already have so much."

In an industry where the majority of her sycophantic fanboys probably earn less than half in a year what she gets lavished upon her, this is her attitude.
As to the whole debate on rinsing, its been happening for years and not just by babeshow girls. If some moron wants to give thousands of pounds worth of gifts to some vacuous girl who has no interest and never will be interested in them, more fool them.
These articles make her out to be almost an innocent in this, and someone who's offering a service to lonely guys. The truth is far darker. Remember that whole 'findom' thing she was revealed as being into? She's one of the main findom artists in the UK.
Option 1 : Lucy Anne "Hollywood" Brooks An indication of how Studio 66 view what has come to light. Importantbladewave
Lucy-Anne & her sisters were debated on itv show Loose Women today and as I thought they were negative towards them. as for me I personally don't really have a problem with rinsing. it isn't illegal for Lucy-Anne & her sisters to ask for their fans for gifts and people aren't being forced to buy them the gifts on their wishlists. if they do want to buy the gifts, then that's fine with me, they just need to realise that all they will probably get from the model they are buying the gift for is a mention on twitter and not to get to go on a date with the model or even sleep with them

agree with fantasy some of the things Lucy-Anne has said do portray her in a bad light.

as for s66, I also cant see them having a problem with this either at least because Lucy-Anne's shows at least in the short term will most likely get more calls. also as has been said, it isn't exactly breaking news models getting gifts from fans
So it seems the sisters should have appeared on loose women but had their booking cancelled when their "porn background" came to light (that's what it says in the headline)

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/75k-s...se-6896636
^^Rammy there's no way that you can portray 'rinsing' with a positive spin.
It may not be illegal but it's morally unacceptable.
It is a bit funny that a show called "loose women" would cancel a show because of that
Reference URL's