If the girls were allowed to show hardcore some channels would go down that route part of full time, but not all. Look at the top shelf of your local newsagent. It probably contains mags with full on penetration etc, and some with just open leg shots. One US mag contain come shots but no "a", another contains "a" but no come shots. Another specialises in fetish. To my amazement I recently saw that Mayfair was still being published, a mag I can only explain as being aimed at men who want to see nudes but not "disrespect" them. And when I used to hang aroung strip pubs with Barry even the pubs that pushed the boundaries featured artistes whose acts varied in strength and varied according to their mood.
Warning signs: Time and again Ofcom justifies its actions by saying adults might accidentally see adult content and be offended by it, and teenagers could tune in because their parents dont even know these channels exist.
Soooo Ofcom might like to explain why it allows Sky to ship receivers with the 900s opted in.
(26-06-2011 00:12 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]If the girls were allowed to show hardcore some channels would go down that route part of full time, but not all. Look at the top shelf of your local newsagent. It probably contains mags with full on penetration etc, and some with just open leg shots. One US mag contain come shots but no "a", another contains "a" but no come shots. Another specialises in fetish. To my amazement I recently saw that Mayfair was still being published, a mag I can only explain as being aimed at men who want to see nudes but not "disrespect" them. And when I used to hang aroung strip pubs with Barry even the pubs that pushed the boundaries featured artistes whose acts varied in strength and varied according to their mood.
Warning signs: Time and again Ofcom justifies its actions by saying adults might accidentally see adult content and be offended by it, and teenagers could tune in because their parents dont even know these channels exist.
Soooo Ofcom might like to explain why it allows Sky to ship receivers with the 900s opted in.
very true but if ofcom keep dilly dallying around what is and isnt allowed how are the channels to know when they are breaking the rules? surely they should be in black and white so no one f***s up,its a wonder the girls dont go insane ,one minute they are allowed to show pubic hair the next its a no no ,two for ones now the girls jsut peck each other and have the occasional feel of one anothers boobs before nipple sucking used to be the norm i havent seen it done for ages ,completely insane all of it
(26-06-2011 00:21 )shankey! Wrote: [ -> ][snip] ...one minute they are allowed to show pubic hair the next its a no no ... [snip]
Further proof, if any were needed, that Ofcom don't have a fucking clue what they're supposed to be doing. They're not fit to wipe my arse.
(27-06-2011 16:36 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ] (26-06-2011 00:21 )shankey! Wrote: [ -> ][snip] ...one minute they are allowed to show pubic hair the next its a no no ... [snip]
Further proof, if any were needed, that Ofcom don't have a fucking clue what they're supposed to be doing. They're not fit to wipe my arse.
Don't think there is a ban on pubic hair at the moment , the Cellcast girls that have hair are always showing theirs from 9pm onwards and in close up , and especially when after 11pm the Cellcast girls do the naked sections
its bloody daylight robbery what these channels are charging per minute for what i can only describe as shite, benny hills angels were more watchable!
(28-06-2011 21:43 )shankey! Wrote: [ -> ][snip] ... benny hills angels were more watchable!
That'd be funny, but for it being perfectly true.
Well I've been working the nightshift for the past few nights, in many ways I'm glad, I've given myself a break from the torturous shows these days, at least until the end of week
No doubt when I'm able again to watch them this weekend I'll back on this thread as unfortunately things just don't seem to be picking up much lately, what with the softy tame shows on RLC which has a lot to do with the choice of models doing the night shows and with the collapse of Sport the absence is now well noted. No more hot Bailey shows, what a shit time at present it is for the babe channels. My only hope is that these channels remain on the air long enough to ride the current storm out. Give it a few years and we might yet see a nightshow worthy of erotic entertainment.
A large qty of girls weren't even topless at midnight before I ventured off to the land of nod. Has the ghost of Mary Shytehaus come back to haunt us?
There is something wrong with Ofcom rulings when my 8 year old daughter is subjected to more erotic images on MTV music videos at 5pm than I am allowed to watch as an adult at 1am.
Even some images in the ad breaks during the peak family viewing period can take some explaining to a child.
Ofcom should be doing more to protect my child than worry about what my delicate little eyes.
(29-06-2011 11:29 )dirtbag Wrote: [ -> ]Ofcom should be doing more to protect my child than worry about what my delicate little eyes.
Unfortunatley that's exactly where our (adults) problem lies when it comes to Ofcom and the babeshows. The rules are as strict as they are precisley because they claim they have to be in oder to protect children.