The looks are significant of course but without quality of performance everything falls down from my perspective.
The babe can be the hottest thing on two legs but without some hint of visual sexual stimulus in performance I lose interest in both viewing and calling.
The set counts for something as does the body language, range of position and pose and movement.
Imagination is so important.
Alas we get very little imagination or creativity at present.
Depressing.
It's very rare for a babe to have it all, the likes of Camilla Jayne, Danni Harwood and Yasmine James are a rare breed, there have been plenty of average looking girls who are good performers on the babeshows and there have been plenty of good looking babes who are average/poor performers, i'd pick the latter every single time
As for the current state of the nightshows i agree they are poor but im used to it now, there were plenty of average/dull solo shows even back in the good old days but people enjoyed them back then because the babeshows were fairly new to most people back in 2008, 2009
the babeshows really are just about phone sex/chat and watching women you find attractive now, expecting them to get naked in the shower with another babe is a thing of the distant past, i'd love to see a return of 2-4-1s more than anything but that isn't going to happen so im over it
Problem is that there is less motivation to ring up for the sex chat in the first place.
Never have I heard so many babes complaining at lack of calls and seen so many waving their phones for so long.
The channels and babes look to me like they have already waved their white flags of concession and apathy.
Everybody happy just to do the bare minimum.
But my feeling is that more and more viewers are becoming savvy to it and the rejection is growing in terms of the willingness to call.
I don't expect naked 2-4-1s in the shower every time. That would be boring if it was happening all the time.
Variety, imagination, creativity, eroticism and visual sexual stimulus is what I am after.
Just seeing babe after babe lying on a bed or sitting on a desk looking bored and gormless is simply not sexually stimulating no matter how good looking they are and no matter how few clothes they have on.
It is just plain dull and not worthy of the cost of the calls.
Of course the babes would try and suggest that is the mentality of the freeloader.
I take a different view.
It is not my job to improve their performance level.
It is their job to put on a show worthy of the cost of the call.
Why should I fork out ridiculous amounts of hard earned cash on lazy, can't be arsed performances?
These babes probably get paid more for a few nights work than I do in a month. The least we should be getting is some effort and attempt at visual sexual stimulation.
Whether it be down to the channels, babes or both the current shows are simply not acceptable in 99% of cases.
It should come as no surprise that a former regular caller like myself has seen his calls reduced by around 95% per month and phone bills drastically reduced at a similar rate.
The nightshows simply do not merit my calls.
(06-09-2015 00:00 )SteveHG Wrote: [ -> ] (05-09-2015 17:25 )Joey 27 Wrote: [ -> ]
Take it from me, you're never too old to stop fancying much younger women. 
Unless you're a Zarwood fan (on separate channels that is) tonight's looking pretty bad, what with Lori occupying one BS channel permanently and Kandi shoehorned into the Office of Death with Victoria.
As far as ages (and types generally) of girls go, I've always thought the channels have been best when they've had a reasonable range in terms of age, shape, style, hair etc. After all, not everyone likes the same type of girl. For me BS seem to have had too many of one type recently - bottle blonde, siliconed and (shall we say) not in the first flush of youth.
Maddie Rose, Candy Sexton, Kiera Knight, Pretti, Cali Garcia, Alice Goodwin, Lori, Beth, Caty Cole and Mica aren't blonde
i agree though BS probably do need one or two younger natural girls on BS to cater for other tastes, give me a 35 year old Leigh Darby or a bottled blonde Lucy Summers over a girl next door type though
Fair points Snookered but what do daybabes do that nightbabes don't do? you seem to be enjoying the dayshows a lot atm, i couldn't take my eyes off Lacey Lorenzo on the dayshows the other day as she looked incredible but she was just sitting on a couch and she hardly moved, i'd much rather see her on nightshows because her show won't be any worse than it is on days plus she won't be wearing many clothes, its not all about charm, spark, personality or what they are like on the phone, sometimes its purely just about seeing tits and arse
The expectation of daytime babes for me is different certainly in terms of movement.
The stimulation is more subtle through things such as the sexy outfits, the body language and the flirty nature.
A bit of tease, titilation and flirt maybe even a bit of panty flash (accidentally on purpose
)
The cheeky winks and pouts are infinitely more effective on daytime I feel. All these things are tempting me to call every now and again. What money I do spend on calls is now more on days than nights.
The personality comes through a bit more on daytime.
I can't explain how or why. It is a strange phenomenon.
(06-09-2015 03:46 )Joey 27 Wrote: [ -> ]Maddie Rose, Candy Sexton, Kiera Knight, Pretti, Cali Garcia, Alice Goodwin, Lori, Beth, Caty Cole and Mica aren't blonde i agree though BS probably do need one or two younger natural girls on BS to cater for other tastes, give me a 35 year old Leigh Darby or a bottled blonde Lucy Summers over a girl next door type though
No of course I wasn't saying all BS girls are blonde, sliconed types, just they do seem to have quite a lot - in fact there's three of 'em on right now.
yeah but if your talking about Sophie, Ashley emma good examples of that type must admit as a man who likes brunette natural them and beth have started to make me question my type
After succumbing to the 2015
bag of shite climatisation and successfully lowering my expectation standards into the gutter..... last night was still shite
On the day show vs night show debate; I think one of the reasons people have time for days is because they still deliver for what they are. They come with less disappointment unlike the night shows which are just plain disappointing IMO.
There's plenty of potential around but it amounts to precisely fuck all.
If I had to choose then I'm with Joey and the tits out would always win. But I get the current attraction to day shows delivering what's on the tin.
(10-09-2015 10:08 )Bandwagon Wrote: [ -> ]After succumbing to the 2015 bag of shite climatisation and successfully lowering my expectation standards into the gutter..... last night was still shite
SNIP
Yeah, last night wasn't great - tonight already looks like it's going to be even worse!